| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| *** | pyvpx has joined #arpnetworks
zhangxiaobao has joined #arpnetworks | [01:26] |
| zhangxiaobao | do we have a looking glass now? | [01:29] |
| mercutio | ``yeah | [01:33] |
| zhangxiaobao | so where is it? | [01:39] |
| *** | zhangxiaobao has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [01:39] |
| .............. (idle for 1h5mn) | ||
| LT has joined #arpnetworks | [02:44] | |
| ............ (idle for 57mn) | ||
| toddf has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
toddf has joined #arpnetworks ChanServ sets mode: +o toddf | [03:41] | |
| ..... (idle for 23mn) | ||
| zhangxiaobao has joined #arpnetworks | [04:04] | |
| zhangxiaobao | I'm sorry I had to leave to attend a meeting
is it public? the looking glass | [04:05] |
| ant | zhangxiaobao: http://lg.arpnetworks.com/ | [04:07] |
| zhangxiaobao | thank you | [04:08] |
| ..................... (idle for 1h41mn) | ||
| *** | zhangxiaobao has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [05:49] |
| ...................................... (idle for 3h7mn) | ||
| LT has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) | [08:56] | |
| .......................... (idle for 2h6mn) | ||
| mkb has joined #arpnetworks | [11:02] | |
| ......................................................................... (idle for 6h1mn) | ||
| mnathani | this whole 95th percentile method for bandwidth billing really has me confused
apparently not all ISPs calculate it the same way? ie: max-of-total(in,out) vs in+out vs max-of-each-in/out-reading | [17:03] |
| mhoran | Doesn't surprise me. | [17:06] |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| brycec | brycec wonders who Spirit Communications si/are that ARP is directly peering with them | [17:21] |
| ..... (idle for 21mn) | ||
| *** | reardencode has joined #arpnetworks | [17:42] |
| up_the_irons | just another network that requested peering... about 2000 prefixes, so not too shaby | [17:47] |
| mnathani | up_the_irons: was there ever a mention of appearing at AMS-IX via coresite and ARP Networks peering even further | [17:48] |
| did the /30 come from ARP space or did they provide it? | [17:55] | |
| up_the_irons | what /30? | [17:57] |
| mnathani | things are different when a route server involved
? | [17:58] |
| up_the_irons | i only vaguely remember something about coresite at AMS-IX
mnathani: we're actually on a shared /23 1 IP for each member | [17:58] |
| mnathani | at any2 | [17:58] |
| up_the_irons | ya know, cuz it's many-to-many, not one-to-one (single link /30) | [17:59] |
| mnathani | could you get paid transit through that setup or is it strictly peering | [17:59] |
| up_the_irons | strictly peering
CoreSite has a new-ish service where it is similar to Any2, but *is* designed for paid transit | [18:02] |
| mnathani | does insufficient bandwidth ever become an issue when you use their fabric to peer with multiple networks, assuming single gigE connection | [18:04] |
| up_the_irons | no, never
we don't have enough traffic overall for it to matter | [18:09] |
| brycec | brycec sets about to change that :D | [18:09] |
| mnathani | I am currently reading: The 2014 Internet Peering Playbook: Connecting to the Core of the Internet
Not sure if an actual core exists any more though | [18:10] |
| up_the_irons | brycec: lol
stop plugging the tubes | [18:12] |
| brycec | (Not really though. I did that once before locally, clogging up mirrors.arpnetworks.com with about 1.1TB of bandwidth)
(but I wouldn't intentionally degrade service for other customers) | [18:12] |
| up_the_irons | oh yeah i remember that ;) | [18:13] |
| mnathani | here is the ams-ix / coresite article: https://ams-ix.net/newsitems/2 | [18:14] |
| brycec | up_the_irons: Fun times :D http://i.imgur.com/A6YyTWy.png | [18:15] |
| up_the_irons | mnathani: oh that's pretty cool
brycec: m/ | [18:16] |
| mnathani | up_the_irons: here is a more recent one with a Chicago DC http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2014/10/07/ams-ix-adds-internet-exchange-at-cmes-chicago-data-center/ | [18:18] |
| up_the_irons | i'll write my sales rep about that, see what is involved in getting hooked up to ams-ix | [18:20] |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| mnathani | cool | [18:35] |
| ......... (idle for 41mn) | ||
| mercutio | oh, nice.
about ams-ix that is. | [19:16] |
| BryceBot | That's what she said!! | [19:17] |
| mercutio | up_the_irons: did coresite ever get back about that outage? | [19:17] |
| brycec | BryceBot: no | [19:18] |
| BryceBot | Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'about ams-ix that is.' | [19:18] |
| ........... (idle for 51mn) | ||
| mercutio | mnathani: peering is a hugely complex issue
some locations tend to be better than others so liek in the US, smewhere like say tampa tends to not have good peering nearby and the edge locations tend to be overloaded more than more inner land ones. like miami connects to south america, san jose to asia etc. and in betwen places liek texas seem so have the best peering in general also california seems to get a lot of cable cuts. | [20:09] |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
