#arpnetworks 2018-05-08,Tue

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
***up_the_irons has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
up_the_irons has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o up_the_irons
[00:48]
.......................... (idle for 2h5mn)
ziyourenxiang_ has joined #arpnetworks
ziyourenxiang_ has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
[02:53]
................. (idle for 1h22mn)
ziyourenxiang has joined #arpnetworks [04:16]
........................................... (idle for 3h31mn)
hive-mind has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
hive-mind has joined #arpnetworks
[07:47]
.............. (idle for 1h8mn)
johnny-o has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [08:56]
........ (idle for 36mn)
johnny-o has joined #arpnetworks
johnny-o has quit IRC (Changing host)
johnny-o has joined #arpnetworks
johnny-o has quit IRC (Client Quit)
[09:32]
johnny-o has joined #arpnetworks
johnny-o has quit IRC (Changing host)
johnny-o has joined #arpnetworks
[09:40]
..... (idle for 23mn)
brycecup_the_irons: My SSH didn't disconnect, nor my IRC, so... I didn't even notice :)
And save for a new hop in my traceroute (s32.lax.arp...) I don't think I'd ever know. I'll check graphs for bandwidth/latency effects later to accumulate more data.
[10:03]
......... (idle for 40mn)
***johnny-o has quit IRC (Quit: reboot) [10:44]
..... (idle for 23mn)
johnny-o has joined #arpnetworks
johnny-o has quit IRC (Changing host)
johnny-o has joined #arpnetworks
[11:07]
................... (idle for 1h30mn)
mercutiobrycec: your /48 hasn't been moved yet btw, just your /64, but any2ix has moved.. [12:37]
brycecmercutio: Oh sorry, I guess I misunderstood when it was said it would be moved that night.
"it'll be moved tonight most likely" not likely enough I guess :P
[12:37]
mercutioi was going to but i want to figure what is happening about that route first. [12:38]
brycecI have no idea about the /64 yet (busy with other stuff. nobody's complained, but then again it sees *very little* traffic and even if v6 were flubbed, hosts should fallback to v4 for those hosts. So it's something I have to specifically look at) [12:41]
mercutioyeah active but less important is more useful in a way
like box that ssh into to irc from :)
[12:43]
brycecYeah I get it. I just meant to give it some context - I haven't touched anything over that connection yet today (and wouldn't have unless someone said something) [12:48]
.......... (idle for 47mn)
mercutioyeah [13:35]
........................ (idle for 1h55mn)
brycecDoing the ol' "download various ISOs" test and for some reason the following URL just seems to timeout on ARP (both on the new v6 router and the old) https://iweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clonezilla/clonezilla_live_stable/2.5.5-38/clonezilla-live-2.5.5-38-i686-pae.iso
(That URL *does* work from my home HE.net tunnel)
2607:f748:10:12::5f:2 is what it resolves to
Oh mtr is telling me it's going out (@ ARP) via NTT,while my home connection goes HE->as6453.net so I guess it's upstream and not an ARP-specific issue.
[15:30]
mercutioi've always found sourceforge mirrors to be terrible
i thikn they're a lot better than tehy used to be though
Location: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/clonezilla/clonezilla_live_stable/2.5.5-38/clonpae.iso?download&failedmirror=iweb.dl.sourceforge.net

hmm
[15:33]
brycecheh, well I brought it up since it initially seemed like a simple routing glitch (and not a "SF mirrors are terrible" matter) [15:35]
mercutioand downloads.sourceforge.net doesn't have ipv6
yeh
checking it out
[15:36]
brycecIs the v6 connection still bottlenecked to 100mbps? (I seem to recall the old router only had a 100mbps port)
My last couple of v6 downloads topped at almost exactly 100mbps so I figured I'd ask and check.
[15:37]
mercutiooh weird
wget -6 on it fails intermittently
that's been resolved for a while brycec
but the old router was cpu bottlenecking a bit too
[15:37]
brycecHm, could be Leaseweb throttling then.
(http://mirror.sfo12.us.leaseweb.net/opnsense/releases/18.1/OPNsense-18.1.6-OpenSSL-dvd-amd64.iso.bz2 was one URL that capped at 100)
[15:38]
mercutioopenbsd tcp/ip stack sucks btw
so you need a close site to get > 100 megabit
i see what you mean
but it goes too close to 100 megabit
for ipv6 overhead etc
looks like a traffic cap
[15:39]
brycec(fwiw I'm downloading from a Linux box) Cool cool, thanks for checking [15:40]
mercutiothat said it's going faster over ipv4 hmm
i wonder why it is going slower though
it's not like it's far away
[15:40]
brycec(Side note: I just downloaded an ISO at 500mbps, that blew me away. v4 only though, so irrelevant to this) [15:45]
mercutiothe kct don't have the 100 megabit limit either [15:45]
brycec(This Linux host is stl actually, bare metal)
*stl21
[15:46]
mercutioah they aren't limited either [15:46]
brycecYeah I know, it was just a speed I don't often see, period. [15:47]
mercutiodid you happen to see that ipv6 iso getting up to 11.9MB/sec btw?
heh i'm getting gigabit fibre at home in a couple of days
well only 500 megabit upload
[15:47]
brycecmercutio: yeah the v6 download from leaseweb topped at 12.0 [15:48]
mercutioi dunno how much i'll see those speeds though :) [15:48]
brycec*12.0MB/s [15:48]
mercutioah, so yeh oddly just over 100% utilisation of 100 megabit :) [15:48]
brycec(And I just downloaded from Italy over v6 at a bit more than 100mbps (bursting to 14MB/s) [15:49]
mercutioi wonder if they have a traceroute site
they do :)
- traceroute ipv6 2607:f2f8:add0::2
Illegal IPv6 address.
- traceroute ipv6 2607:F2F8:ADD0:0002:0:0:0:0
Illegal IPv6 address.
i'm not sure how to make it work
it didn't like name either
[15:49]
brycecWhat site? [15:52]
mercutiohttp://leasewebnoc.com/en/lookingglass
CoreSite - Any2 Los Angeles
Los Angeles, USA
IP
TBD
it seems they might be joining any2ix
[15:52]
brycechm yup no idea. All of their tools fail. [15:54]
mercutioheh [15:54]
brycecYet "ERROR: IPv6 address for IPv4 query" so something understands *that* much :P [15:54]
mercutiohmm i had a plugin for chrome to do web benchmark before but i think it stopped working
but is there any nice way to test real world performance difference between vdsl and fibre?
when i was testing ipv6 i downloaded linux kernel and it's pretty small now days
i mean it's huge, it's nearly 100mb compressed
but in the grand scheme of things it's not like you're waiting 15 minutes for it to download or anything :)
[15:55]
...................... (idle for 1h45mn)
***ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [17:43]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)