[06:02] *** pjs_ has joined #arpnetworks [06:06] *** carvite_ has joined #arpnetworks [06:09] *** JC_Denton_ has joined #arpnetworks [06:10] *** anis has joined #arpnetworks [06:11] *** JC_Denton has quit IRC (*.net *.split) [06:11] *** pjs has quit IRC (*.net *.split) [06:11] *** carvite has quit IRC (*.net *.split) [06:11] *** anisfarhana has quit IRC (*.net *.split) [06:11] *** BryceBot has quit IRC (*.net *.split) [06:15] *** ziyourenxiang_ has joined #arpnetworks [06:16] *** BryceBot has joined #arpnetworks [06:16] *** BryceBot is now known as Guest5935 [06:20] *** carvite_ has quit IRC (Changing host) [06:20] *** carvite_ has joined #arpnetworks [06:20] *** carvite_ is now known as carvite [07:15] *** Guest5935 is now known as BryceBot [07:16] *** BryceBot is now known as Guest34050 [08:17] *** Guest34050 is now known as BryceBot [08:18] *** BryceBot is now known as Guest36816 [09:19] *** Guest36816 is now known as BryceBot [09:19] *** BryceBot has quit IRC (Changing host) [09:19] *** BryceBot has joined #arpnetworks [10:00] *** pjs_ is now known as jps [10:00] *** jps is now known as pjs [11:13] *** erratic has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) [12:04] *** erratic has joined #arpnetworks [13:48] *** zedomega_ has joined #arpnetworks [13:53] *** zedomega has quit IRC (*.net *.split) [13:55] *** anis has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [13:59] *** anis has joined #arpnetworks [15:43] *** mercutio has joined #arpnetworks [15:43] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o mercutio [15:44] We're implementing a new ipv6 router, would anybody be interested in beta testing it? [15:44] mercutio: I'm intrigued. What's involved? [15:44] *** JC_Denton_ is now known as JC_Denton [15:45] (just my /48 gets moved/announced from the new router, and I update my end?) [15:45] brycec: We'd just port your vlan over. [15:45] *** JC_Denton is now known as Guest47441 [15:45] You wouldn't change your end. [15:45] *** Guest47441 is now known as JC_Denton [15:46] Cool. Should I expect much interruption/stability? (I mean, yeah it's a beta test, but *how* beta is it? :p) [15:51] Either way, I have a /64 (viable for beta-beta) and /48 (ideally late-beta) I'm happy to test with. [15:51] brycec: a little potentially [15:51] that's why looking for beta testers first. :) [15:52] it shouldn't be greatly unstable. it's like running a beta OS :) [15:52] I'm pretty confident it's solid [15:53] Sounds good. My /64 does very, very little traffic while my /48 disruptions would be noticed but wouldn't be show-stopping. [15:53] it's not like running on beta hardware, it's more that there is a chance for issues because less proven stable rather than predictably unstable. [15:53] That's all the endorsement I need :) [15:53] What's next, need me to email? PM? [15:53] We'll be terminating Cogent there as soon as they get their heads out of their asses and actually set up our new session [15:54] ("terminating" is really terrible language choice when crossing from telecom back to the real world "Oh you're killing the contract?") [15:54] there's also killing a session etc, yeah, it can be odd ;) [15:55] brycec: nothing, mercutio will move your VLAN [15:55] then there's "server daemons" [15:55] That's what she said!! [15:55] Haha yeah [15:55] *** ziyourenxiang_ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) [15:55] your /64 and /48 are on the same vlan? [16:03] BryceBot: no [16:03] Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'then there's "server daemons"' [16:03] mercutio: no, completely different accounts in fact. [16:03] 2607:f2f8:abf0::/64 and 2607:f2f8:a650::/48 [16:10] brycec: ah, so you want to move just your /64 now, or the /48 as well? [16:11] mercutio: Yeah both accounts, more traffic is better right? [16:11] sure :) [16:11] (both now, I wasn't clear) [16:12] ping me if any issues [16:12] (Assuming I can connect to Freenode :P *rimshot*) [16:12] heh [16:12] you can always connect over ipv4 if ipv6 issues :) [16:20] ok moving your /64 shortly [16:21] brycec: do you have a test IP that you'd like me to check works? [16:22] vps3.cobryce.com [16:22] (That's on the /48) [16:22] ah on the /64 [16:23] (Had to look that one up) 2607:f2f8:abf0::253 should work [16:25] cool, i'll move your vlan now brycec [16:25] and check that that works :) [16:26] * brycec starts an mtr running :) [16:28] * brycec is observing packet loss to 2607:f2f8:abf0::253 [16:29] it's moved but i can't reach from international [16:29] hangon :) [16:29] 100% packet loss? [16:29] Yeah, unreachable it seems. Coming from HE. [16:29] yeh it's from he.net i'm seeing it not work too [16:31] can you ping the gateway from there? [16:31] because the gateway can ping you [16:32] * brycec has to look up that host's v4 addy... [16:34] mercutio: Yes, that :253 host is able to ping 2607:f2f8:abf0::1. My home connection is NOT able to ping 2607:f2f8:abf0::1 [16:34] it's odd, i can see the traffic going to you just no return [16:35] like it's lost it's default router [16:35] but still can see the gateway [16:35] can you see the default gw still looks sane? [16:36] weird i just saw some dns request come through [16:37] Its default route is definitely set and working, and it was able to ping an IPv6 address of Google. [16:38] oh [16:38] But when I try to reach that host from my home HE tunnel, nada. [16:39] yeh hangon [16:40] from ARP FRA doesn't work either, in case that helps you [16:47] ok better now brycec ? [16:48] mercutio: Seems to work [16:48] sorry about that [16:48] Beta(TM) [16:48] ironically it was the old router being the issue [16:49] it didn't load the route into fib from rib [16:49] that is the kernel routing table didn't match the userlevel routing table [16:49] still doesn't work from FRA [16:50] oh fIorz ? [16:50] [...] [16:50] 11 r2.lax.arpnetworks.com (2607:f2f8:0:7::165) 179.839 ms 185.234 ms 175.512 ms [16:50] 12 * * * [16:52] brycec: are you allowing icmp? [16:53] or maybe I am pinging the wrong address? [16:54] 2607:f2f8:abf0::253 is the one that I don't get any responses from, ::1 and :a650::3 do respond [16:56] only abf0 has moved, and ::1 is gateway, that is why i was asking bryce :) [16:56] i can see traffic going through to it, but not coming back [19:24] I'm sorry, I stepped away earlier once everything was working. Yes actually, the device blocks all traffic by default including ICMP packets. [19:24] cool [19:25] brycec: how is your latency? :) [19:25] I haven't noticed any changes. [19:25] heh [19:25] mercutio: Did you port the /48 I gave you too? I didn't notice any disruptions (I expected Freenode would've disconnected) [19:26] brycec: not yet :) [19:27] it'll be moved tonight most likely [19:27] Cool [19:28] That one I use much, much more so I'll notice any changes in latency there. [19:28] cool. [19:29] (The /64 you moved earlier is used basically-never, rarely anything "interactive" it's just there to be dualstack to a few sites that are 99.99% IPv4-only) [19:29] Does your normal route go via any2ix? [19:30] I have no idea, and `mtr` can't seem to resolve any of the hops to DNS names so I still don't know. (looking at the un-moved network/host) [19:32] (Even traceroute6 fails to resolve them, blah) [19:32] that is so common with ipv6 [19:33] I'm blaming Debian this time. The versions of mtr and traceroute on my home desktop have no issues with PTR for most of the hops [19:33] 2001:504:13::211:15 [19:33] 2001:504:13::211: would be the any2ix [19:33] 15 is facebook :) [19:34] Ah yes I see that /36 (32?) in my mtr [19:34] 2. AS??? 2001:504:13::1a [19:34] cool [19:34] oh oops i maent 13 [19:34] (mtr couldn't even determine its AS number) [19:34] i stripped off the last ip heh [19:34] 2001:504:13::/48 [19:35] so yeah any2ix should be migrated onto it soon too [19:36] Just checked and both the moved and unmoved networks, going to google.com, are going over ANY2IX. [19:36] yeh google will, ISP traffic and other further away traffic is less likely [19:36] people like google, facebook etc peer a lot :) [19:37] well ISP traffic in US I should say is less likely to [19:38] In that case, testing from my home HE.net tunnel to both the "moved" and "not yet moved" networks goes via HE.net -> ge-100-0-0-13.r00.lsanca07.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [19:38] (And off the top of my head, I only have HE.net tunnels to test from) [19:38] he.net goes via any2ix [19:39] it'll be reverse path going over ntt [19:39] ntt is terminated on a different router than any2ix [19:40] And whadya know, running mtr the opposite way (towards my home connection) does show ANY2IX on both old and new v6 routers [22:30] How's it looking now?