| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| *** | pjs_ has joined #arpnetworks
carvite_ has joined #arpnetworks JC_Denton_ has joined #arpnetworks anis has joined #arpnetworks JC_Denton has quit IRC (*.net *.split) pjs has quit IRC (*.net *.split) carvite has quit IRC (*.net *.split) anisfarhana has quit IRC (*.net *.split) BryceBot has quit IRC (*.net *.split) ziyourenxiang_ has joined #arpnetworks BryceBot has joined #arpnetworks BryceBot is now known as Guest5935 carvite_ has quit IRC (Changing host) carvite_ has joined #arpnetworks carvite_ is now known as carvite | [06:02] |
| ............ (idle for 55mn) | ||
| Guest5935 is now known as BryceBot
BryceBot is now known as Guest34050 | [07:15] | |
| ............. (idle for 1h1mn) | ||
| Guest34050 is now known as BryceBot
BryceBot is now known as Guest36816 | [08:17] | |
| ............. (idle for 1h1mn) | ||
| Guest36816 is now known as BryceBot
BryceBot has quit IRC (Changing host) BryceBot has joined #arpnetworks | [09:19] | |
| ......... (idle for 41mn) | ||
| pjs_ is now known as jps
jps is now known as pjs | [10:00] | |
| ............... (idle for 1h13mn) | ||
| erratic has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) | [11:13] | |
| ........... (idle for 51mn) | ||
| erratic has joined #arpnetworks | [12:04] | |
| ..................... (idle for 1h44mn) | ||
| zedomega_ has joined #arpnetworks | [13:48] | |
| zedomega has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
anis has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) anis has joined #arpnetworks | [13:53] | |
| ..................... (idle for 1h44mn) | ||
| mercutio has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o mercutio | [15:43] | |
| mercutio | We're implementing a new ipv6 router, would anybody be interested in beta testing it? | [15:44] |
| brycec | mercutio: I'm intrigued. What's involved? | [15:44] |
| *** | JC_Denton_ is now known as JC_Denton | [15:44] |
| brycec | (just my /48 gets moved/announced from the new router, and I update my end?) | [15:45] |
| mercutio | brycec: We'd just port your vlan over. | [15:45] |
| *** | JC_Denton is now known as Guest47441 | [15:45] |
| mercutio | You wouldn't change your end. | [15:45] |
| *** | Guest47441 is now known as JC_Denton | [15:45] |
| brycec | Cool. Should I expect much interruption/stability? (I mean, yeah it's a beta test, but *how* beta is it? :p) | [15:46] |
| Either way, I have a /64 (viable for beta-beta) and /48 (ideally late-beta) I'm happy to test with. | [15:51] | |
| mercutio | brycec: a little potentially
that's why looking for beta testers first. :) it shouldn't be greatly unstable. it's like running a beta OS :) | [15:51] |
| up_the_irons | I'm pretty confident it's solid | [15:52] |
| brycec | Sounds good. My /64 does very, very little traffic while my /48 disruptions would be noticed but wouldn't be show-stopping. | [15:53] |
| mercutio | it's not like running on beta hardware, it's more that there is a chance for issues because less proven stable rather than predictably unstable. | [15:53] |
| brycec | That's all the endorsement I need :)
What's next, need me to email? PM? | [15:53] |
| up_the_irons | We'll be terminating Cogent there as soon as they get their heads out of their asses and actually set up our new session | [15:53] |
| brycec | ("terminating" is really terrible language choice when crossing from telecom back to the real world "Oh you're killing the contract?") | [15:54] |
| mercutio | there's also killing a session etc, yeah, it can be odd ;) | [15:54] |
| up_the_irons | brycec: nothing, mercutio will move your VLAN | [15:55] |
| mercutio | then there's "server daemons" | [15:55] |
| BryceBot | That's what she said!! | [15:55] |
| up_the_irons | Haha yeah | [15:55] |
| *** | ziyourenxiang_ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) | [15:55] |
| mercutio | your /64 and /48 are on the same vlan? | [15:55] |
| brycec | BryceBot: no | [16:03] |
| BryceBot | Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'then there's "server daemons"' | [16:03] |
| brycec | mercutio: no, completely different accounts in fact.
2607:f2f8:abf0::/64 and 2607:f2f8:a650::/48 | [16:03] |
| mercutio | brycec: ah, so you want to move just your /64 now, or the /48 as well? | [16:10] |
| brycec | mercutio: Yeah both accounts, more traffic is better right? | [16:11] |
| mercutio | sure :) | [16:11] |
| brycec | (both now, I wasn't clear) | [16:11] |
| mercutio | ping me if any issues | [16:12] |
| brycec | (Assuming I can connect to Freenode :P *rimshot*) | [16:12] |
| mercutio | heh
you can always connect over ipv4 if ipv6 issues :) | [16:12] |
| ok moving your /64 shortly
brycec: do you have a test IP that you'd like me to check works? | [16:20] | |
| brycec | vps3.cobryce.com
(That's on the /48) | [16:22] |
| mercutio | ah on the /64 | [16:22] |
| brycec | (Had to look that one up) 2607:f2f8:abf0::253 should work | [16:23] |
| mercutio | cool, i'll move your vlan now brycec
and check that that works :) | [16:25] |
| brycec | brycec starts an mtr running :)
brycec is observing packet loss to 2607:f2f8:abf0::253 | [16:26] |
| mercutio | it's moved but i can't reach from international
hangon :) 100% packet loss? | [16:29] |
| brycec | Yeah, unreachable it seems. Coming from HE. | [16:29] |
| mercutio | yeh it's from he.net i'm seeing it not work too
can you ping the gateway from there? because the gateway can ping you | [16:29] |
| brycec | brycec has to look up that host's v4 addy...
mercutio: Yes, that :253 host is able to ping 2607:f2f8:abf0::1. My home connection is NOT able to ping 2607:f2f8:abf0::1 | [16:32] |
| mercutio | it's odd, i can see the traffic going to you just no return
like it's lost it's default router but still can see the gateway can you see the default gw still looks sane? weird i just saw some dns request come through | [16:34] |
| brycec | Its default route is definitely set and working, and it was able to ping an IPv6 address of Google. | [16:37] |
| mercutio | oh | [16:38] |
| brycec | But when I try to reach that host from my home HE tunnel, nada. | [16:38] |
| mercutio | yeh hangon | [16:39] |
| fIorz | from ARP FRA doesn't work either, in case that helps you | [16:40] |
| mercutio | ok better now brycec ? | [16:47] |
| brycec | mercutio: Seems to work | [16:48] |
| mercutio | sorry about that | [16:48] |
| brycec | Beta(TM) | [16:48] |
| mercutio | ironically it was the old router being the issue
it didn't load the route into fib from rib that is the kernel routing table didn't match the userlevel routing table | [16:48] |
| fIorz | still doesn't work from FRA | [16:49] |
| mercutio | oh fIorz ? | [16:50] |
| fIorz | [...]
11 r2.lax.arpnetworks.com (2607:f2f8:0:7::165) 179.839 ms 185.234 ms 175.512 ms 12 * * * | [16:50] |
| mercutio | brycec: are you allowing icmp? | [16:52] |
| fIorz | or maybe I am pinging the wrong address?
2607:f2f8:abf0::253 is the one that I don't get any responses from, ::1 and :a650::3 do respond | [16:53] |
| mercutio | only abf0 has moved, and ::1 is gateway, that is why i was asking bryce :)
i can see traffic going through to it, but not coming back | [16:56] |
| .............................. (idle for 2h28mn) | ||
| brycec | I'm sorry, I stepped away earlier once everything was working. Yes actually, the device blocks all traffic by default including ICMP packets. | [19:24] |
| mercutio | cool
brycec: how is your latency? :) | [19:24] |
| brycec | I haven't noticed any changes. | [19:25] |
| mercutio | heh | [19:25] |
| brycec | mercutio: Did you port the /48 I gave you too? I didn't notice any disruptions (I expected Freenode would've disconnected) | [19:25] |
| mercutio | brycec: not yet :)
it'll be moved tonight most likely | [19:26] |
| brycec | Cool
That one I use much, much more so I'll notice any changes in latency there. | [19:27] |
| mercutio | cool. | [19:28] |
| brycec | (The /64 you moved earlier is used basically-never, rarely anything "interactive" it's just there to be dualstack to a few sites that are 99.99% IPv4-only) | [19:29] |
| mercutio | Does your normal route go via any2ix? | [19:29] |
| brycec | I have no idea, and `mtr` can't seem to resolve any of the hops to DNS names so I still don't know. (looking at the un-moved network/host)
(Even traceroute6 fails to resolve them, blah) | [19:30] |
| mercutio | that is so common with ipv6 | [19:32] |
| brycec | I'm blaming Debian this time. The versions of mtr and traceroute on my home desktop have no issues with PTR for most of the hops | [19:33] |
| mercutio | 2001:504:13::211:15
2001:504:13::211: would be the any2ix 15 is facebook :) | [19:33] |
| brycec | Ah yes I see that /36 (32?) in my mtr
2. AS??? 2001:504:13::1a | [19:34] |
| mercutio | cool
oh oops i maent 13 | [19:34] |
| brycec | (mtr couldn't even determine its AS number) | [19:34] |
| mercutio | i stripped off the last ip heh
2001:504:13::/48 so yeah any2ix should be migrated onto it soon too | [19:34] |
| brycec | Just checked and both the moved and unmoved networks, going to google.com, are going over ANY2IX. | [19:36] |
| mercutio | yeh google will, ISP traffic and other further away traffic is less likely
people like google, facebook etc peer a lot :) well ISP traffic in US I should say is less likely to | [19:36] |
| brycec | In that case, testing from my home HE.net tunnel to both the "moved" and "not yet moved" networks goes via HE.net -> ge-100-0-0-13.r00.lsanca07.us.ce.gin.ntt.net
(And off the top of my head, I only have HE.net tunnels to test from) | [19:38] |
| mercutio | he.net goes via any2ix
it'll be reverse path going over ntt ntt is terminated on a different router than any2ix | [19:38] |
| brycec | And whadya know, running mtr the opposite way (towards my home connection) does show ANY2IX on both old and new v6 routers | [19:40] |
| ................................... (idle for 2h50mn) | ||
| up_the_irons | How's it looking now? | [22:30] |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |