| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| *** | km_ has left | [02:10] |
| ...................................................................................................................... (idle for 9h49mn) | ||
| mercutio has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
mercutio has joined #arpnetworks ChanServ sets mode: +o mercutio | [11:59] | |
| ............. (idle for 1h3mn) | ||
| RandalSchwartz | you can now "ping 1.0" and "ping 1.1" | [13:05] |
| brycec | Huh, I knew CF had 1.0.0.1 but sounds like they're listening on 1.0.0.0 too? | [13:14] |
| RandalSchwartz | maybe | [13:24] |
| ................................. (idle for 2h43mn) | ||
| mercutio | you ping 1.2 too it seems
this 1.1.1.1 thing made me learn about 9.9.9.9 | [16:07] |
| ........ (idle for 35mn) | ||
| mike-burns | ping: no address associated with name | [16:42] |
| ............. (idle for 1h1mn) | ||
| *** | kevr is now known as `0000000000
`0000000000 is now known as `100101011100101 `100101011100101 is now known as kevr | [17:43] |
| .... (idle for 19mn) | ||
| brycec | ping 1.2 \ PING 1.2 (1.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data. \ 64 bytes from 1.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=10.6 ms
mike-burns: what were you trying to ping? | [18:02] |
| mike-burns | 1.0
OpenBSD. ~% ping 1.0 ping: no address associated with name | [18:03] |
| brycec | ping 1.0 \ PING 1.0 (1.0.0.0): 56 data bytes \ 64 bytes from 1.0.0.0: icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=8.804 ms
^ OpenBSD ping for me (OpenBSD 5.8 but whatever, I know it's old) | [18:03] |
| mike-burns | 6.2 GENERIC.MP#312
Fascinating. Oh huh. I wonder whether they re-wrote ... something. | [18:03] |
| brycec | Works on 6.0
brycec has a 6.1 host around here somewhere..... 6.1 fails | [18:05] |
| mike-burns | Maybe that happened when they merged ping6(8) into ping(8). | [18:06] |
| brycec | 6.1 still has ping6 separated (at least as commands go)
(oh they're hardlinked to the same binary) | [18:07] |
| mike-burns | Right yeah.
That might be it. | [18:07] |
| brycec | "ping(8) and ping6(8) are now the same binary and share the engine." https://www.openbsd.org/61.html | [18:07] |
| mike-burns | http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/ping/ping.c.diff?r1=1.212&r2=1.213 - found it. | [18:08] |
| brycec | <3 you for finding that mike-burns | [18:08] |
| mike-burns | http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/ping/ping.c?rev=1.213&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup - better link.
Eh neither link is perfect. | [18:08] |
| brycec | "Only allow standard dot notation for IPv4 addresses." :/
Is "1.0" not standard dot notation? | [18:09] |
| mike-burns | Are you about to make me read an RFC? | [18:09] |
| brycec | lol no
I have a hard time believing that "standard dot notation" is an RFC term. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-decimal_notation seems to be buried in that | [18:09] |
| BryceBot | Dot-decimal notation :: Dot-decimal notation is a presentation format for numerical data. It consists of a string of decimal numbers, each pair separated by a full stop (dot). A common use of dot-decimal notation is in information technology where it is a method of writing numbers in octet-grouped base-10 (decimal) numbers separated by dots (full stops). In computer networking, Internet Protocol Version 4 addresses are commonly written using... | [18:11] |
| brycec | So basically it's an "intermediate representation" that inet_aton was nice enough to decode
"it also supported intermediate syntax forms of octet.24bits (e.g. 10.1234567; for Class A addresses) and octet.octet.16bits (e.g. 172.16.12345; for Class B addresses)" | [18:13] |
| mike-burns | Ah yeah, right in the manpage -- you can pass a, a.b, a.b.c, or a.b.c.d to inet_aton(3). | [18:15] |
| brycec | I'm still boggled to read materials from a time when the Internet (address allocations etc) could be documented in a short RFC https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc790
(Yeah, I'm "young", not yet 32 :P ) | [18:15] |
| mike-burns | I love short RFCs.
I was hoping to find a post on tech@ but alas, nothing. I wonder where those OKs came from ... | [18:16] |
| ......... (idle for 41mn) | ||
| brycec | ICB I assume | [18:58] |
| mike-burns | Must be.
How secretive. | [18:58] |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |