BryceBot: no
Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'Lefty: contract'
Yeah I suppose my point was that ROR (and Rails in general) just doesn't come up on today's buzzword bingo cards very often.
These days it's less of a buzzword and more of a stable piece of software. The progression of tech.
There was quite a bit about the future of Ruby at RubyConf this year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-A9eRzCBL0&index=1&list=PLE7tQUdRKcyayGHjjxZOmVEGsxX-rczZt - opening keynote from the creator of Ruby.
YouTube video: "RubyConf 2017: Opening Keynote - Good Change, Bad Change by Yukihiro Matsumoto" by Confreaks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2WgVr1rv3c&index=3&list=PLE7tQUdRKcyayGHjjxZOmVEGsxX-rczZt
YouTube video: "RubyConf 2017: Keynote - The Impermanence of Software by Andy Croll" by Confreaks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiT2XEWae1c&index=20&list=PLE7tQUdRKcyayGHjjxZOmVEGsxX-rczZt
YouTube video: "RubyConf 2017: Saving Ruby from the Apocalypse by Jason Charnes" by Confreaks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH_y45he4-o&index=33&list=PLE7tQUdRKcyayGHjjxZOmVEGsxX-rczZt
YouTube video: "RubyConf 2017: Keynote: Growing Old by Chad Fowler" by Confreaks
Those are the culture-based ones. There were also quite a few technical talks about the actual technical future of Ruby. It's going to be fast!
Those look/sound like worthwhile watches, thanks. And good point on the transition from "buzz" to stable/reliable/core infrastructure. (Not that these are mutually exclusive, plenty of companies are building themselves on top of tech that is still in the buzzword bingo card.) Just like COBOL and C aren't on the bingo card anymore...
Okay, troubleshooting time! I'm trying to reach a VPS of qbit's at 174.136.100.91. From the outside world, no problem - ping, connect, etc. From ARP subnets (1 Thunder, 1 VPS, 1 Metal, across 2 accounts/VLANs), no response. I'm pretty sure ARP doesn't block traffic between its VLAns (because I can connect across my accounts). qbit claims "i ain't got no blockins
\o/
" and I've confirmed his netmask is set right. Anyone got thoughts? Can anyone else ping that IP from ARP?
i ain't!
(Stupid embedded enter)
(I don't believe you!)
(:P)
( http://ix.io/DiP )
mah pf.conf
(heh I see you've given up on your matrix_whitelist thing)
yeah, no needed since they fixed the dumb "rejoin rooms" thing
pfctl -t abusive_ssh -T test 174.136.103.130 ; pfctl -t abusive_www -T test 174.136.103.130 ; pfctl -t fail2ban -T test 174.136.103.130
pretty please, qbit?
0/1 addresses match.
0/1 addresses match.
0/1 addresses match.
Then I'm at a loss :(
qbit: Do you at least see (tcpdump) my pings?
tcpdump -i vio0 -c 10 icmp
what is the tcpdump command?
<3
yes
15:27:16.105402 vps3.cobryce.com > spark.akb.io: icmp: echo request (DF)
Are you able to ping back?
no, shows host is down
route -n get 174.136.103.130
(That's OpenSBD syntax, obvs)
It *should* say gateway: <your gateway>
huh
spark# rout
   route to
destination
       mask
  interface
 if address
   priority
      flags
     use
    1824
ohgod
That's what she said!!
i have no idea how i did a horizontal select
that's neat
and completely useless :P
http://ix.io/DiS
so it's trying to go out my alias?
It's trying to go direct
without routing
gimme yo ip!
^ That's what it's supposed to look like
:O
        inet 174.136.100.82 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 174.136.255.255
dat netmask
whoa dude
no wonder
http://man.openbsd.org/hostname.if
how do i tell :D
qbit it guessed at the netmask since you didn't give it one
try now
It should be "alias 174.136.100.82 255.255.255.255"
ping still not wresponding
i have that - but with the proper subnet
oh, literally 255.255.255.255?
Aliases usually are given a /32
(notice the examples ;))
qbit: you're gonna want to `ifconfig vio0 -alias 174.136.100.82 ; ifconfig vio0 alias 174.136.100.82 255.255.255.255`
That'll delete and readd the alias manually.
Or just delete then netstart
(But netstart on its own won't delete the previous alias, you def need to do that manually)
woo
brycec: work now? :D
qbit: Negative, no ping responses, no TCP connect
        inet 174.136.100.82 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 174.136.255.255
ehhem
bro did you even udpate your hostname.vio0?
*update
yes
Well not very well :P
http://ix.io/DiX
qbit: Shouldn't that second line be "inet alias" not just "alias"?
(And how that's even working at all, I'll never know :P)
i don't know
but it doesn't work even if i run you command
i mean.. it works
but the alias mask stays incorrect
The next step is clear: /tableflip
@tableflip
No! Fuck you, brycec!! Don't you dare un-flip this table, mcchunkie. DON'T YOU DARE!
o_o
heh
#nocontext
#nobot
@tableflip
(╯‵Д′)╯彡┻━┻
fwiw my commands forgot the "inet" parts too
**`ifconfig vio0 inet -alias 174.136.100.82 ; ifconfig vio0 inet alias 174.136.100.82 255.255.255.255`
Because I'm not perfect.
**`ifconfig vio0 inet -alias 174.136.100.82 ; ifconfig vio0 inet alias 174.136.100.82 netmask 255.255.255.255` even
that did it
workin?
yuppers!
bitchin
Thank you very much for taking the time to work through this and crash your box :)
np