[05:40] up_the_irons: ima do openbsd on the thunder (re-your email - also replied from there - but i can't ever remember if it's above or below the line to reply :D) [05:41] qbit: got it :) [05:41] woo [05:42] hopefully it works out (vmm that is) [06:18] *** ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) [10:22] up_the_irons: got my last email?! [12:00] qbit: i'm curious how that'd work! [12:00] i haven't actualyl played with openbsd vmm yet. have you tried it anywhere else already? [12:00] mercutio: i will let you know [12:00] yeah, use it reguarly on my laptop [12:00] works great [12:00] sweet [12:00] i wish openbsd would get a decent filesystem [12:01] that seems to be the biggest issue now.. [12:01] That's what she said!! [12:01] they seem to be making great progress everywehre else. [12:02] i'd argue ffs is perfectly decent ;D [12:02] missing some fancy features for sure [12:03] but i feel ya [12:03] if i could snapshot - i would be pretty happy [12:03] i dunno, i love zfs... [12:04] i think something like zfs is really good for virtual machines. [12:04] being able to snapshot, clone, etc is nifty. [12:48] ya [20:49] BryceBot: no [20:49] Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'that seems to be the biggest issue now..' [20:51] I've seen FFS get fubar, or at least dump a whole boatload of inodes in lost+found, much more frequently than any other modern filesystem. [20:52] About on-par with ext2 I suppose. [20:52] (Hint, ffs really does not handle "being unplugged" nicely)