<!-- Some styling for better description lists --><style type='text/css'>dt { font-weight: bold;float: left;display:inline;margin-right: 1em} dd { display:block; margin-left: 2em}</style>

   up_the_irons: <u>qbit</u>: got it :)
   qbit: woo
   <br> hopefully it works out (vmm that is)
   ***: ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
   fIorz: <u>up_the_irons</u>: got my last email?!
   mercutio: <u>qbit</u>: i'm curious how that'd work!
   <br> i haven't actualyl played with openbsd vmm yet.  have you tried it anywhere else already?
   qbit: <u>mercutio</u>: i will let you know
   <br> yeah, use it reguarly on my laptop
   <br> works great
   mercutio: sweet
   <br> i wish openbsd would get a decent filesystem
   <br> that seems to be the biggest issue now..
   BryceBot: That's what she said!!
   mercutio: they seem to be making great progress everywehre else.
   qbit: i'd argue ffs is perfectly decent ;D
   <br> missing some fancy features for sure
   <br> but i feel ya
   <br> if i could snapshot - i would be pretty happy
   mercutio: i dunno, i love zfs...
   <br> i think something like zfs is really good for virtual machines.
   <br> being able to snapshot, clone, etc is nifty.
   qbit: ya
   brycec: <u>BryceBot</u>: no
   BryceBot: Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'that seems to be the biggest issue now..'
   brycec: I've seen FFS get fubar, or at least dump a whole boatload of inodes in lost+found, much more frequently than any other modern filesystem.
   <br> About on-par with ext2 I suppose.
   <br> (Hint, ffs really does not handle "being unplugged" nicely)