[02:32] *** dne has joined #arpnetworks
[04:19] *** BryceBot has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
[04:20] *** BryceBot has joined #arpnetworks
[05:22] *** Lucifer333 has joined #arpnetworks
[05:47] *** Seji has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
[05:47] *** eryc has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
[05:48] *** Seji has joined #arpnetworks
[05:49] *** eryc has joined #arpnetworks
[05:49] *** eryc has quit IRC (Changing host)
[05:49] *** eryc has joined #arpnetworks
[06:54] *** qbit has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 1.5)
[06:58] *** qbit has joined #arpnetworks
[08:26] <mkb> is there any tld I can use for a private network that icann has promised not to sell?
[08:31] <mike-burns> RFC 2606 says .test, .example, .invalid, .localhost.
[08:31] <sjackso> .icannhaz, .icannsux, .icannworstever...
[08:33] <sjackso> more seriously, I suppose you could look at what opennic has defined: http://wiki.opennicproject.org/OpenNICNamespaces , though I don't see a reason why icann couldn't sell colliding tlds someday
[08:34] <mkb> there's a rfc that says example, test, invalid, and localhost are reserved
[08:34] <mkb> I guess test is the best one
[08:35] <mkb> oh yeah mike-burns mentioned the rfc
[09:56] *** mhoran has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
[09:57] *** sjackso has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
[09:57] *** KDE_Perry has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
[09:57] *** up_the_irons has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
[09:57] *** mhoran has joined #arpnetworks
[09:57] *** KDE_Perry has joined #arpnetworks
[09:57] *** sjackso has joined #arpnetworks
[09:57] *** up_the_irons has joined #arpnetworks
[09:57] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o up_the_irons
[10:38] *** abthorpet is now known as tabthorpe
[11:35] *** dne has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
[11:35] *** mkb has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
[11:35] *** CaZe has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
[11:35] *** mkb has joined #arpnetworks
[11:36] *** dne has joined #arpnetworks
[11:36] *** CaZe has joined #arpnetworks
[15:39] <ziyourenxiang> no localdomain? i think i saw some (mail-related?) application using localhost.localdomain when not configured. looks nice.
[15:41] <mike-burns> There's no guarantee that localdomain won't become a TLD in the future.
[16:00] *** ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
[16:01] <mercutio> what
[16:02] <mercutio> could someone make a TLD called localdomain?
[16:02] <mercutio> next you're going to say we should use the rest of 127.0.0.0/8 except 127.0.0.1/32 as we're running out of ip addresses
[16:37] <mhoran> IPv6 seems super laggy right now?
[17:13] <mhoran> Yeah, IPv6 is totally busted.
[17:32] <mercutio> what's it doing mhoran ?
[17:35] <mhoran> Seems better now, but it was unusable from home via ssh (just super laggy typing in weechat) and also weechat was showing 12 second lag to freenode.
[17:35] <mercutio> ahh.  did it last long?
[17:36] <mhoran> maybe 30min.
[17:43] *** caseyandgina has joined #arpnetworks
[17:44] <caseyandgina> When building a custom kernel for a linux VM, is it ideal to use the No-Op I/O scheduler, which in theory should just leave everything up to the host I/O scheduler and not double-complicate things?
[17:44] <mercutio> deadline gives pretty similar performance tbh
[17:45] <mercutio> but no-op vs deadline vs cfq is minor
[17:45] <mercutio> cfq has some advantages if you want to make use of it's advanced features
[17:45] <mercutio> usually people who test these things just do a single user doing read/write etc... when disk performance more matters under higher load
[17:45] <mercutio> which is much harder to test..
[18:00] <up_the_irons> hmm
[18:09] <caseyandgina> Looks like EFI could be useful, for building a simpler kernel that uses ACPI "Reduced Hardware" mode.  https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/ACPI/AcpiReducedHw
[18:10] <caseyandgina> I will give it a try regardless ;)
[18:44] <up_the_irons> let us know how it goes :)
[18:49] <nathani> how does 95th percentile billing work for bandwidth? Stats has never been one of my strong suites
[18:52] <mercutio> wikipedia describes it
[18:53] <up_the_irons> samples are taken periodically (say, every 5 minutes), and the top 5% are thrown away, what is left is what you're billed for (that is, the 95th percentile)
[18:53] <up_the_irons> this makes it so one can burst, and not be penalized, for the most part
[18:53] <mercutio> you can burst quite a lot
[18:54] <up_the_irons> in a month, that's 36 available hours that are not "tracked", so-to-speak
[18:54] <mercutio> but if you leave bittorrent seeding at 100 megabit for 2 days then you get charged for 100 megabit
[19:06] <up_the_irons> right :)
[19:21] *** caseyandgina has quit IRC (Quit: Lost terminal)
[20:28] *** Lucifer333 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
[20:41] <nathani> whats the relation between monthly transfer and percentile, or does it only matter how much of the time you burst and not your actual monthly transfer?
[20:42] * nathani heads over to wikipedia for more info
[20:54] *** Lucifer333 has joined #arpnetworks
[21:08] <nathani> brycec: your backlit keyboard looks really cool
[22:56] <mercutio> it's only how much you burst
[22:56] <mercutio> but you can only burst as fast as you can transfer
[22:57] <mercutio> so you might be able to do say 500 megabit for 4% of the time and 5 megabit the rest of the time
[22:57] <mercutio> and it's still accounted for as 500 megabi
[23:02] <up_the_irons> nathani: no relation, they measure different things.  one is speed, the other is quantity.