nathani: you around? trying to figure out how to put this Bell HH3000 ONT into passthrough mode yup Im here did you get your b1 number and password? nathani: yeah I have it right here Do I set the WAN mode to 'WAN Ethernet'? what device do you want the public IP to land on? dont need to change WAN mode nathani: my Mikrotik router hook up a port from one of the LAN connections over to WAN Port or Ether 1 on Mikrotik yeah its connected that way now open the gui / Mikrotik admin get to interfaces click the + add a new pppoe client interface Dial Out tab > put in the b1# and password back to General Tab > select the interface hooked up to the Bell Modem / Router you will need to configure NAT for the pppoe-out1 interface and your LAN / Bridge nathani: just to be clear, am I supposed to have the ethernet cable in the red port marked as WAN or the yellow ports marked as LAN? on the Bell device, LAN and you dial out from behind that port even though it is giving you a private IP if you DHCP and have Internet connectivity oh I see what you mean you will be using 2 public IPs essentially yeah one for the BELL / NAT and Wifi will be using that one as well other for your Miktrotik what model mikrotik? mine maxed out at about 240mbits/sec so I can't use it in my network CRS125-24G-1S-1RM nice dslreports.com had somone terminate the fiber directly onto CRS - if you are feeling adventurous and specifically since you have only Internet and no Phone or TV nathani: problem is I can't get the fiber from the room where its at to the CRS i would have to move the CRS I don't get on with the CRS devices. I've tried to use them as switches and the vlan config is incomprehensible I've got dozens of CCR boxes, they're great. And many dozens of virtual mikrotiks. It's just the switches I don't get https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgXHc0xCccw YouTube video: "99 Problems but a switch aint one - cisco parody" by Kenny hicks plett: yeah, RouterOS VLAN configuration is terrible to grok staticsafe: It's fine on the CCRs. I make heavy uses of vlans and bridges on them plett: im on of those people who buy a managed switch and use it like a dumb one so I just need to switch and NAT atm flat L2, no VLANs I almost always need vlans when I'm using a switch The most common use-case is a trunk port from a router to a switch containing 4 or 5 vlans, and the switch breaks them out onto different ports And there's frequently special devices which need to be on multiple vlans And some of the examples in http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS_examples#VLAN are just WTF staticsafe: ##mikrotik suggests you will get max 250 Mbps with your Mikrotik device " mducharme | you might be able to offset that drop by using something like fasttrack" Mikrotik's routers are a friendly UI on top of linux networking functionality. So if you understand things like iptables and brctl then they're awesome. The problem is that they've done the same with the switches - but you need to understand the underlying switch chip instruction set to make any sense of them nathani: http://www.speedtest.net/result/5925053353 with fasttrack enabled and you are on gigabit profile? nathani: yeah the installer verified that before we left you are getting your upload so theres that he* I didnt test mine with Fasttrack but wouldnt go over 250 how much more if you bypass the mikrotik? nathani: http://www.speedtest.net/result/5924949073 my full speed, depending on the speedtest server I dont think these speed test sites do justice to gigabit links http://www.speedtest.net/result/5925070329 they don't yeah probably should do a iperf test with a localish server download a large linux ISO torrent it will likely use most of your pipe 630 Mbps down, holy shit, nice too bad it doesnt come with a static IP i'd buy bandwidth from you if it did lol did I mention its unmetered? it's probably banned for commercial use yea they say no servers etc lots of speedtest servers have 10 gig links now any public iperf ones? i dunno about iperf i mean speedtest.net ones iperf.he.net lol last i knew speedtest doesn't support > gbe clients though