did it remember a failure?
Seems like it
(brb)
you can route delete -host
usually
route -n get 192.168.1.1
can be revealing
(If you're curious, pay attention to the MAC addresses http://sprunge.us/QijW )
but yes, 'No route to host' generally can also mean pf is blocking
(unless one has tried with pfctl -d ;))
Jeez toddf isn't it about 2am there? You're up late.
brycec: joys of a family and 'getting stuff done' generally means waiting till everybody else is asleep
you're up past midnight too, bryce :)
mercutio: by 13 minutes :P
heh
(my fiancee just got home from work)
i'm trying to go to bed at 9:30 pm now
means i get up really early
which seems even better than being up late for me
good sleep habits .. pipe dream for now .. I get up early with the older two, am up late helping mamma feed the younger one .. ;-(
toddf: micro nap?
why the hell is FreeBSD sending the ICMP response to a different MAC than it was received from?? The ARP table is correct, routing looks fine. Hmm
mercutio: that would cut into my supposed work time during the day .. otherwise I'm 100% on the go wrangling kids or other bits of life ;-( .. family needs a lifehack badly, just need to find the fuel and direction ..
toddf: catch 22
brycec: io clash?
ip
arping works on linux
i don't know if it's available on bsd
arping program, rather than task.
Problem solved, was a pf rule on the FreeBSD side
woot
so tcpdump operates before pf
that seems kind of lame
actually for incoming traffic that'd be better
Yeah I love that fact about it
"If I see it in tcpdump then I know the packet at least made it this far, and to start digging into pf" etc etc
In this case, FreeBSD side had a "(reply-to $ARP's_GW)" in the rule allowing that private traffic
Well, sorry for the noise.
noise is good
things have been quiet recently
...too quiet...
mercutio: wow, 9:30pm *is* early
up_the_irons: ikr :)
it helps avoid the second wind though
yeah, i can understand that for sure.  I get my second wind around 10/11
yeah, so it means more balanced energy, and it means waking up really early where it's quiet like the evening
so it's kind of a win/win
sweet
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10533/samsung-expands-its-pm1633a-lineup-as-1536-tb-ssd-hits-retail-for-10k
that seems rather high density
mercutio: I wouldnt trust my data on an SSD with such high capacity, unless it was backed by a RAID 10 or something similar
mnathani: i wouldn't want to spend $10,000 USD on a SSD myself...
but raid 10... that's $40k.. for 2x2...
personally i have 4 ssd in raid 10 at home
and when i get around to it i'm shifting to raidz with 3 larger ssd
there's really no iops performance benefit, and write endurance isn't really a big deal
At that capacity and price, SSDs like that are usually destined for Big Data and Big Compute where you need more storage than you can feasibly have as RAM, that data is initially stored somewhere more traditionally reliable, spooled to SSD, then crunched.
i.e. Amazon ECS, Hadoop clusters, etc
In fact I can think of several Amazon/cloud services that would benefit from such a beast.