| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| *** | Guest_84747 has joined #arpnetworks | [03:05] |
| ...... (idle for 27mn) | ||
| Guest_84747 has quit IRC (Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client) | [03:32] | |
| ..... (idle for 20mn) | ||
| _iwc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | [03:52] | |
| _iwc has joined #arpnetworks | [04:00] | |
| ....................................................................................................... (idle for 8h31mn) | ||
| mnathani | Now I know why OpenVPN is so cool. After spending multiple hours trying to get a Road Warrier IPSec Setup with the client behind a NAT, I return to OpenVPN bliss. Only need to open / port forward a single UDP port and it works like a charm even from behind an LTE Networks Carrier Grade Nat. I mean why would anyone use anything else? | [12:31] |
| ........ (idle for 39mn) | ||
| mercutio | yeh ipsec is terrible for that kind of situation | [13:10] |
| nathani | Would you recommend anything other than openvpn for my situation? | [13:12] |
| mercutio | idk your situation
but if openvpn works no rason to shift from it oh forwarding udp port seems sensible enough | [13:12] |
| *** | DaCa has joined #arpnetworks | [13:18] |
| .......... (idle for 48mn) | ||
| nclee has joined #arpnetworks | [14:06] | |
| .... (idle for 18mn) | ||
| JC_Denton | only major advantage i ever see with IPSec is if your client is an office router, like a small Cisco, or you need broadcast traffic which not all the ovpn clients handle well | [14:24] |
| .................................................. (idle for 4h5mn) | ||
| *** | mnathani has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | [18:29] |
| ........................................... (idle for 3h30mn) | ||
| mnathani has joined #arpnetworks | [21:59] | |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |