I broke down and finally made a Facebook page for us
https://www.facebook.com/arpnetworks
yeah, and I liked it already :)
:)
mnathani2: thanks for the review on FB :)
no
np
up_the_irons: snapchat next, or maybe instagram?
tinder
Tinder
s/no/no problem
<mnathani> no problem
damn... beat me to it
high five, RandalSchwartz ;)
RandalSchwartz: any interesting floss weekly shows you would recommend lately?
we just did an update on node.js, and in the chatroom, they were calling it one of the best episodes ever.
cool - will check that out
is the chat IRC based?
yeah
irc.twit.tv channel #twitlive
if you're into Perl, the two episodes with Will 'The Chill' about the future of Perl Performance and RPerl were pretty cool.
heh, no snapchat or instagram
He's not ruling out Tinder!
no not tinder either! ;)
lol
Perhaps it would be wise to register arpnetworks accounts on Snapchat and Instagram for future expansion
And avoid squatters
that's not a bad idea
And Tinder ofcourse :-)
maybe someone's servers want to date our servers
I was able to get randalschwartz .com .org .net .info and .me - most of those in the last few days
that sounds expensive
nice having a fairly unique name spelling
$55 for com org net me
per year
hover.com is my go-to registrar
they are nice
for a while, they were a sponsor of FLOSS, and offered a 20% discount
is hover dnssec friendly?
I believe so
theres something I can set in the manage domain page
"dnssec not supported for pl domains"
ok, lemme see another
Yeah, my .com is good
key - algorithm - digest algorithm - digest
wiki is gone?
 it wasn't maintained anyway
support is where all the good stuff is
yes, it was useless
portal.* is givin an X for ssl
site uses weak security config
SHA-1, so your connection may not be private
in Chrome
not on my Win 10 machine, but a freshly installed Windows 7 VM
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=portal.arpnetworks.com
rated as F
nathani: it's not showing that on linux either
my VM might be behind on updates
maybe a new root Cert Auth was supposed to be installed
wtf we had an A
and didn't change anything
we had an a for www
oh i c
xenial has the first "stable" release for http2, but it's the same as the beta release.
i think that's what it was at least
how many people are using http2 for web hosting so far?
is http2 backwards compatible with http?
it's an upgrade of http
it's like you do http, the server says i can do http2, the client says ok, let's do http2.
does the OS have to support it, or just the browser? for client side?
just the browser
A client that makes a request for an "http" URI without prior knowledge about support for HTTP/2 on the next hop uses the HTTP Upgrade mechanism (Section 6.7 of [RFC7230]). The client does so by making an HTTP/1.1 request that includes an Upgrade header field with the "h2c" token.
is a lot of http2 only supported over https?
now that is a browser thing
http2 doesn't care if you ssl or non ssl
but lots of browsers aren't doing http2 over non-encrypted connections
the same way that gmail is starting to mark emails that aren't sent over encrypted connections as insecure.
there was a huge push from google about this.  microsoft were saying that cellphones don't want the overhead of encryption to be necessary.