[00:00] *** sjackso has joined #arpnetworks [00:01] *** sjackso is now known as Guest81817 [03:35] I broke down and finally made a Facebook page for us [03:36] https://www.facebook.com/arpnetworks [05:07] *** abthorpet is now known as tabthorpe [05:29] *** Lucifer333 has joined #arpnetworks [06:41] *** Lucifer333 has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) [07:41] *** Guest81817 is now known as sjackso [09:40] yeah, and I liked it already :) [13:29] *** Lucifer333 has joined #arpnetworks [13:47] :) [14:08] mnathani2: thanks for the review on FB :) [14:27] *** mnathani2 is now known as mnathani [14:27] no [14:27] np [14:27] up_the_irons: snapchat next, or maybe instagram? [14:27] tinder [14:27] Tinder [14:27] s/no/no problem [14:27] no problem [14:27] damn... beat me to it [14:28] high five, RandalSchwartz ;) [14:28] RandalSchwartz: any interesting floss weekly shows you would recommend lately? [14:42] we just did an update on node.js, and in the chatroom, they were calling it one of the best episodes ever. [14:46] cool - will check that out [14:46] is the chat IRC based? [14:55] yeah [14:55] *** avj has joined #arpnetworks [14:55] irc.twit.tv channel #twitlive [14:56] if you're into Perl, the two episodes with Will 'The Chill' about the future of Perl Performance and RPerl were pretty cool. [14:57] heh, no snapchat or instagram [14:58] He's not ruling out Tinder! [14:58] no not tinder either! ;) [14:58] * mike-burns swipes left on that. [14:59] lol [15:33] Perhaps it would be wise to register arpnetworks accounts on Snapchat and Instagram for future expansion [15:33] And avoid squatters [15:34] that's not a bad idea [15:41] And Tinder ofcourse :-) [15:48] maybe someone's servers want to date our servers [15:48] I was able to get randalschwartz .com .org .net .info and .me - most of those in the last few days [15:48] that sounds expensive [15:48] nice having a fairly unique name spelling [15:48] $55 for com org net me [15:49] per year [15:49] hover.com is my go-to registrar [15:49] they are nice [15:53] for a while, they were a sponsor of FLOSS, and offered a 20% discount [16:08] is hover dnssec friendly? [16:13] I believe so [16:13] theres something I can set in the manage domain page [16:14] "dnssec not supported for pl domains" [16:14] ok, lemme see another [16:14] Yeah, my .com is good [16:15] key - algorithm - digest algorithm - digest [16:16] *** avj has quit IRC (Quit: ircII EPIC4-2.10.5 -- Are we there yet?) [16:16] *** avj has joined #arpnetworks [16:59] *** up_the_irons changes topic to: VPS Services: https://arpnetworks.com/vps | FAQ: http://support.arpnetworks.com/faqs | Twitter: http://twitter.com/arpnetworks | @up_the_irons is staff, other ops are long-time customers | Channel Log: http://is.gd/eWA5u [19:13] *** KILLALLHUMANS01 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [19:13] *** KILLALLHUMANS01 has joined #arpnetworks [19:14] *** toddf_ has joined #arpnetworks [19:14] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o toddf_ [19:18] *** toddf has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [20:46] wiki is gone? [20:50] it wasn't maintained anyway [20:50] support is where all the good stuff is [21:15] yes, it was useless [21:16] portal.* is givin an X for ssl [21:16] site uses weak security config [21:16] SHA-1, so your connection may not be private [21:16] in Chrome [21:17] not on my Win 10 machine, but a freshly installed Windows 7 VM [21:21] https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=portal.arpnetworks.com [21:21] rated as F [21:29] nathani: it's not showing that on linux either [21:31] my VM might be behind on updates [21:31] maybe a new root Cert Auth was supposed to be installed [21:31] wtf we had an A [21:31] and didn't change anything [21:31] we had an a for www [21:31] oh i c [21:34] xenial has the first "stable" release for http2, but it's the same as the beta release. [21:34] i think that's what it was at least [21:34] *** qbit has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 1.5) [21:35] how many people are using http2 for web hosting so far? [21:36] is http2 backwards compatible with http? [21:37] it's an upgrade of http [21:37] it's like you do http, the server says i can do http2, the client says ok, let's do http2. [21:38] does the OS have to support it, or just the browser? for client side? [21:38] just the browser [21:38] A client that makes a request for an "http" URI without prior knowledge about support for HTTP/2 on the next hop uses the HTTP Upgrade mechanism (Section 6.7 of [RFC7230]). The client does so by making an HTTP/1.1 request that includes an Upgrade header field with the "h2c" token. [21:39] is a lot of http2 only supported over https? [21:39] now that is a browser thing [21:39] http2 doesn't care if you ssl or non ssl [21:40] but lots of browsers aren't doing http2 over non-encrypted connections [21:40] the same way that gmail is starting to mark emails that aren't sent over encrypted connections as insecure. [21:40] there was a huge push from google about this. microsoft were saying that cellphones don't want the overhead of encryption to be necessary. [21:47] *** qbit has joined #arpnetworks