| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| mercutio | Is anybody here keen to test a new boot menu for vps? | [02:05] |
| ............................................................................................................................ (idle for 10h17mn) | ||
| *** | Squillis has joined #arpnetworks | [12:22] |
| Squillis | hello
should i be able to relay mail through my vps? | [12:22] |
| ant | Squillis: yes | [12:23] |
| Squillis | ok. i'll keep digging | [12:23] |
| ant | Squillis: i.e. there are no packet filters for typical smtp ports | [12:24] |
| Squillis | that's what i was asking
thanks | [12:24] |
| ..... (idle for 22mn) | ||
| oh, cox
Note: SMTP is only permitted outbound to Cox-provided SMTP servers. i should have guessed | [12:46] | |
| mike-burns | Rough. | [12:47] |
| Squillis | quality service from a quality company | [12:48] |
| ant | Squillis: do they allow port 587 (submission)? | [12:50] |
| Squillis | it's not explicitly blocked
i was going to use another port if postfix allows that i figure it does | [12:50] |
| ant | it does. but submission is actually meant to be used by smtp clients connecting to a relay
instead of 25 | [12:52] |
| Squillis | ah. i didn't know that | [12:52] |
| mercutio | yeah it's pretty lonng standing
and postfix will automatically support it these days you can adjust stuff in master.cf if you want some alternate port or such | [12:52] |
| ant | i actually support providers that block port 25 outgoing, because every legit user should use 587 | [12:55] |
| brycec | I support residential ISPs blocking 25 because of spam botnets | [13:09] |
| ant | that's what i wanted to express ;) | [13:09] |
| brycec | (It's usually paired with requiring authenticated SMTP to the ISP's own relays)
heh | [13:09] |
| ..... (idle for 20mn) | ||
| mercutio | Now people spam through Gmail. | [13:29] |
| mnathani | mercutio: still need someone to test the new boot menu? | [13:43] |
| mercutio | yeh sure
mnathani: shutdown and boot your VM and you should get it | [13:43] |
| dne | what's new in the new boot menu? | [13:48] |
| .... (idle for 16mn) | ||
| mercutio | dns: it always shows boot options
so you don't need to press f12 | [14:04] |
| *** | nathani has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 1.3) | [14:06] |
| mnathani | shutting down now | [14:06] |
| mercutio | cool | [14:06] |
| dne | aha, I don't shut down very often :) | [14:06] |
| mercutio | neither do i
but i think this is a good improvement none the less | [14:07] |
| mnathani | 12 second timout
could probably use like 15 | [14:07] |
| mercutio | mnathani: you can press enter or select boot option to go quicker
ahh | [14:07] |
| dne | had to shut down the other day though - for some reason the freebsd bootloader didn't find the disk when I rebooted for an upgrade (never happened before) | [14:08] |
| mercutio | dne: 10.3?
there seems to be an issue with 10.3 | [14:10] |
| dne | yup, second reboot during freebsd-update (after userland is upgraded) | [14:11] |
| mercutio | hmm
that's not good i had issues with iso booting | [14:11] |
| dne | first reboot (only kernel upgraded) was fine | [14:12] |
| mercutio | so kernel didn't boot?
hmm there was an issue with 10.1 | [14:12] |
| dne | i think it got stuck at the 1st stage bootloader | [14:12] |
| mercutio | that could be the same issue that 10.3 boot iso is having
how did you work around it? | [14:13] |
| dne | after shutdown it booted fine again | [14:13] |
| mercutio | oh | [14:13] |
| dne | from the panel | [14:13] |
| mercutio | that could be the "warm boot" kvm bug | [14:13] |
| dne | aha | [14:14] |
| mercutio | https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1329956
i found when trying to figure out why 10.3 iso isn't booting | [14:14] |
| dne | weird
this never happened before though, that I can remember | [14:16] |
| mercutio | the 10.1 bug was different
after install it didn't umount the file system cleanly and so you'd need to do a fsck which is just wrong, but doesn't actually stop things working | [14:16] |
| dne | ah yes, but that was a freebsd bug
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-15:05.ufs.asc ? | [14:17] |
| that shouldn't occur on a fresh install from the iso though | [14:23] | |
| ....... (idle for 33mn) | ||
| up_the_irons | I wonder what's a good web-based IRC gateway... | [14:56] |
| *** | [sean] has left | [15:05] |
| brycec | glowing-bear.org :) (technically a web-weechat relay gateway) | [15:16] |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| up_the_irons | lol
I was thinking more for people who don't use IRC at all. So they could still join this channel from our website or something. Not long term, but maybe to ask a question or something. | [15:31] |
| brycec | I usually point people at Freenode's own web irc gateway | [15:33] |
| up_the_irons | ah OK | [15:35] |
| .................................... (idle for 2h59mn) | ||
| *** | nathani has joined #arpnetworks | [18:34] |
| ..... (idle for 21mn) | ||
| erratic has quit IRC (Quit: All good things must come to an end) | [18:55] | |
| ...... (idle for 27mn) | ||
| erratic has joined #arpnetworks | [19:22] | |
| ......... (idle for 40mn) | ||
| erratic has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) | [20:02] | |
| ............. (idle for 1h0mn) | ||
| mnathani has quit IRC () | [21:02] | |
| ................................... (idle for 2h53mn) | ||
| erratic has joined #arpnetworks | [23:55] | |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |