[00:00] I didnt see any mentiono of latency on the microwave uplink. Did you? [00:00] s/mentiono/mention [00:00] I didnt see any mention of latency on the microwave uplink. Did you? [00:04] it won't be high enough to be a problem [00:06] is 900mhz and 3.65ghz FFA in the US? [00:08] 3.65 is 802.11y righ? [00:08] 900 certainly is [00:08] 3.65 is wifi-max it seems [00:08] and it looks like there's some easy licensing thing or such [00:09] I think he already had the drone. Or needed an excuse to buy a drone. Either way, it's pretty solid - easy to try different heights quickly, as well as moving around trying each try. Solid to me. [00:09] yeah it is nifty :) [00:09] but could do it without it too :) [00:09] Well yeah, and you could send mail without the Internet too :P [00:09] heh [00:10] damn now i'm trying to remember the last time i sent a postal letter [00:10] Point being they're all just tools [00:15] *** hive-mind has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) [00:34] *** hive-mind has joined #arpnetworks [00:34] *** d^_^b has quit IRC (Quit: Lost terminal) [00:34] *** hycer has quit IRC (Quit: Ok, I'm Out.) [00:37] *** pjs has quit IRC (Quit: EPIC5-1.1.2[1638] - amnesiac : stop it dad! You're crushing my smokes!) [02:13] *** anis has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) [02:51] *** hycer has joined #arpnetworks [03:11] *** toddf has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [03:11] *** toddf has joined #arpnetworks [03:11] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o toddf [03:32] *** anis has joined #arpnetworks [05:48] brycec: were you once saying that the photos on our website should be noted as not being stock photos? [05:48] well I agree and so it is now noted [08:24] TT my screen has coredumped a couple times since maintentance [08:24] o.O [09:04] up_the_irons: yep that was something I believed :) (and still do) [10:15] *** pjs has joined #arpnetworks [10:21] *** dj_goku has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [10:53] *** tooth_ is now known as tooth [14:48] milki: that seeems bizzare [15:45] brycec: :) [15:46] yeah that always bugged me; i'm glad I had enough CSS chops to get it in there nicely [15:55] Looks good [18:20] tnx [18:24] Isnt greylisting really annoying when you are waiting for a specific email and it gets delayed? [18:25] it can be [18:41] mnathani_: yes [18:41] i hate greylisting with a passion :) [18:42] i also don't see much benefit from it these days. lots of spam comes from yahoo, gmail etc. [18:42] there's a lot less people sending from random cable ip's, and much more from hacked accounts. [18:42] at least when using rbl's [18:48] anyone follow the Google / Cogent IPv6 peering dispute? [18:57] *** kellytk has joined #arpnetworks [18:58] I see in the customer portal that reverse DNS may be specified with three different record types. I typically only see one option, to provide the hostname of the IP to reverse to. Is that a Ptr record? [18:59] CNAME and NS are the other two [18:59] NS I think is if you want to store the PTR records on your own nameserver, so ARP will delegate those records over to you [19:00] as per portal.* You may use CNAME and/or NS records to set up delegation to other name servers (without the need for RFC 2317) [19:11] Cogent and a dispute! [19:12] i haven't followed but i saw it there. [19:13] mercutio: Is CNAME the correct reverse DNS record type if I'd like to provide a FQDN for the IP to reverse to? [19:13] no [19:13] cname is if you want a reference [19:13] like when you do a cname lookup on www.google.com and it goes to google.com [19:14] www.google.com. 132 IN A 172.217.1.100 [19:14] cnames aren't very popular anymore [19:14] I get an A record for Google [19:14] :-) [19:14] yeah google used to have a cname somewhere [19:14] but don't seem to anymore [19:15] mercutio: Which type of reverse DNS record should I use in the customer portal if not CNAME? [19:15] www.gmail.com. 21599 IN CNAME mail.google.com. [19:15] mnathani found one :) [19:15] just use a PTR [19:15] kellytk: I think you are looking for PTR [19:16] for example: 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa. 11304 IN PTR google-public-dns-a.google.com. [19:17] mnathani_: oh interesting, you have one of those 172.217 addresses too [19:17] mnathani_: i just saw those addresses the other day, and at first i'm like ... what? [19:18] google recently started using 172.217.0.0/16 [19:18] but i don't normally see 172 addresses, but it's no different from 192 which I do see :) [19:18] less than 15 days it seems: First seen: 2016-02-10 [19:18] i'm on 216.58 atm [19:21] *** dj_goku has joined #arpnetworks [19:41] *** kellytk has left [20:24] 4.2.2.2: www.google.com. 293 IN A 172.217.0.36 [20:24] 4.2.2.3: www.google.com. 285 IN A 216.58.217.132 [20:24] opendns: www.google.com. 37 IN A 172.217.0.164 [20:45] *** d^_^b has joined #arpnetworks [20:45] *** d^_^b has quit IRC (Changing host) [20:45] *** d^_^b has joined #arpnetworks