I didnt see any mentiono of latency on the microwave uplink. Did you? s/mentiono/mention I didnt see any mention of latency on the microwave uplink. Did you? it won't be high enough to be a problem is 900mhz and 3.65ghz FFA in the US? 3.65 is 802.11y righ? 900 certainly is 3.65 is wifi-max it seems and it looks like there's some easy licensing thing or such I think he already had the drone. Or needed an excuse to buy a drone. Either way, it's pretty solid - easy to try different heights quickly, as well as moving around trying each try. Solid to me. yeah it is nifty :) but could do it without it too :) Well yeah, and you could send mail without the Internet too :P heh damn now i'm trying to remember the last time i sent a postal letter Point being they're all just tools brycec: were you once saying that the photos on our website should be noted as not being stock photos? well I agree and so it is now noted TT my screen has coredumped a couple times since maintentance o.O up_the_irons: yep that was something I believed :) (and still do) milki: that seeems bizzare brycec: :) yeah that always bugged me; i'm glad I had enough CSS chops to get it in there nicely Looks good tnx Isnt greylisting really annoying when you are waiting for a specific email and it gets delayed? it can be mnathani_: yes i hate greylisting with a passion :) i also don't see much benefit from it these days. lots of spam comes from yahoo, gmail etc. there's a lot less people sending from random cable ip's, and much more from hacked accounts. at least when using rbl's anyone follow the Google / Cogent IPv6 peering dispute? I see in the customer portal that reverse DNS may be specified with three different record types. I typically only see one option, to provide the hostname of the IP to reverse to. Is that a Ptr record? CNAME and NS are the other two NS I think is if you want to store the PTR records on your own nameserver, so ARP will delegate those records over to you as per portal.* You may use CNAME and/or NS records to set up delegation to other name servers (without the need for RFC 2317) Cogent and a dispute! i haven't followed but i saw it there. mercutio: Is CNAME the correct reverse DNS record type if I'd like to provide a FQDN for the IP to reverse to? no cname is if you want a reference like when you do a cname lookup on www.google.com and it goes to google.com www.google.com. 132 IN A 172.217.1.100 cnames aren't very popular anymore I get an A record for Google :-) yeah google used to have a cname somewhere but don't seem to anymore mercutio: Which type of reverse DNS record should I use in the customer portal if not CNAME? www.gmail.com. 21599 IN CNAME mail.google.com. mnathani found one :) just use a PTR kellytk: I think you are looking for PTR for example: 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa. 11304 IN PTR google-public-dns-a.google.com. mnathani_: oh interesting, you have one of those 172.217 addresses too mnathani_: i just saw those addresses the other day, and at first i'm like ... what? google recently started using 172.217.0.0/16 but i don't normally see 172 addresses, but it's no different from 192 which I do see :) less than 15 days it seems: First seen: 2016-02-10 i'm on 216.58 atm 4.2.2.2: www.google.com. 293 IN A 172.217.0.36 4.2.2.3: www.google.com. 285 IN A 216.58.217.132 opendns: www.google.com. 37 IN A 172.217.0.164