yea, that's annoying
mercutio: yup, I am dealing with cPanel
yew
i can see its use, but eek
finally fixed my file server.. dodgy RAM was crashing it, just managed to pull 4GB of ancient PC6400 for £10
and surprisingly, it handled a 6 hour memtest bashing
mnathani_: my condolences
interesting.. i wouldn't have suspected a double in capacity would actually improve this things performance
it rarely used the 2GB before
now it's using 2.6GB
although honestly speaking, last i used one was about 4 years ago
threshold used to be slackware was borderlining hate (yet i loved it), debian (swear by as i have no time for BS), gentoo (simply because its LFS w/ the base already fixed and you can do wtf ever), but ultimately my homey is FreeBSD
if i can't do it in FreeBSD, it isn't worth doing (impo)
well cpanel is like steamos on top of debian
except with source.
err at least with things like easyapache
i used centos 7 somewhat recently, it was alright
i'm not a huge linux guy though so i only use it when i have to (in this case, i was just refamiliarizing myself w/it since the last centos i'd used was 5.x)
wasn't a huge fan of how unreliable EPEL repos are
epel?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
adds things that should be in the main repos but aren't
like nginx
ahh
i see
nginx has official pacakges
i use those on ubuntu
i really want something in betwen arch linux and ubuntu
epel would regularly error out when running yum updates though
like a stablised form of arch
it was super annoying
i get minor problems with arch sometimes.
but overall i prefer it
i was ok with it on a personal server
used it for around a year
yeah i had some problem with nginx and upgrades and having to update some locally built stuff
i'm using a aur package for nginx
for fancyindex of all things
haha
i want a better index actually
i wonder if anyone knows of any good ones
i'd like something that could be gui like
and show snapshots of content etc.
i haven't looked for anything like that in probably 10yrs
the thing i deployed back then was a mess of php stuff
yeh that's what i fear :)
CVE-2015-5366
"A remote attacker can cause a denial of service against applications that use epoll by injecting a single packet with an invalid checksum."
does that sound more than slightly disconcerting to anyone else?
haha
mercutio: Do you know why https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5366 isn't yet updated?
i'm not usually too concerned about dos attacks
but when it's a single packet
someone could just send one packet to each ip in the world and ddos everyone!
kellytk: it only came out today
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5366 has more information
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3246
there's usually a hold while distributions organise releases.
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3245
those two are fun too
that has less information kelly
what's libuser?
i don't have it on my system
mercutio: It has more information for what I'm being shown
https://fedorahosted.org/libuser/
kelly: mine says "reserved" this candidate has been reserved...
blah blah
Which is less than the redhat information
kelly: no my redhat one says that
i used the lwn one
Ok, well I see more information on the redhat page, so I don't know what we're talking about
https://lwn.net/Articles/652164/
which is the same as e-mail one basically
maybe it's caching old versions?
i dunno
** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided.
that's what the redhat one tells me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239029
oh there's more here
is that what you were thinking of?
https://ma.ttias.be/chrome-44-sending-https-header-by-mistake-breaking-web-applications-everywhere/
whoops
can a FreeBSD host be used for kvm, xen or other kinds of virtualization?
behyve
or whatever it is
I've done bhyve and qemu
Oh and VirtualBox
k
freebsd was going to support xen dom0
dunno what happened.
netbsd supports dom0
and freebsd supports domu
yea, runs well in domu too
(netbsd, i mean)
it's very light on memory usage.
this chrome bug is driving me batshit.
haha
which one?
new 44.x build released to stable, also in beta still (they haven't incremented beta up yet)
https://ma.ttias.be/chrome-44-sending-https-header-by-mistake-breaking-web-applications-everywhere/
it's causing tabs to die spontaneously
click a link, "it's dead jim"
it's super annoying
i wonder why i haven't hit it
are you on that build?
oh i have chrome 46
canary?
or dev?
yellow
i have an older one too but the yellow one is more stable
yeah, i rolled up to beta and it's the same build as stable right now
thought maybe i'd get lucky but nope
ahh the other one is beta
and 44.0.2403.89
beta-m 64 bit
yeah, that's the stable build
just missing the beta tag
does canary fix it?
it is canary
it works along side on windows, so you can have both :)
on linux i have chromium and chrome
i might grab one of the windows chromium builds
seems he's at 46.0.2464.0 atm
http://chromium.woolyss.com/download/en/
chromium is better than chrome in some ways.
i kind of wish someone would do a nice chromium fork that follows updtes.
with auto update etc.
but without the google tie in stuff
that reminds me i should disable flash
to be fair, i would reckon a nontrivial amount of people that like privacy enough to not use chrome and instead use chromium
would not want autoupdates