[01:25] *** relrod_ has joined #arpnetworks [01:25] *** relrod_ has quit IRC (Changing host) [01:25] *** relrod_ has joined #arpnetworks [01:27] *** relrod_ is now known as relrod [08:16] why i like routers w/ USB [08:16] chuck in an 8GB class 6 or better flash card and boom.. you're laughin [08:37] i called them up on that typo & they offered me the 10GB package half price for three month (7.50) [08:38] apparently it just went live as i was looking at it [08:38] only needed 5GB for two months.. but whatever [08:39] and extra 15GB for £1.50 [09:08] Can anyone recommend an image sharing CMS similar to imgur.com? [09:08] I want to host my own [09:08] but really only for my use [09:32] the only thing i can think of is gallery2, but is probably overkill for your needs [09:33] has an XML API to upload images to it directly from phones/websites, imaging apps etc. [09:33] and can be done via the web browser too ofc [09:36] piwigo looks nice too [09:37] hrm, if im running ssh on a random port and do a large sftp transfer, is it rate capped at all? [09:55] No. 1) That rate cap you're thinking of is for connections, not data transfer. 2) That rule only matches 22/TCP. http://support.arpnetworks.com/kb/main/is-there-a-firewall-filter-rate-limit-or-similar-device-applied-to-my-traffic [10:33] *** grody has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) [10:48] *** grody has joined #arpnetworks [10:48] that was fun [10:49] 1:) forgot to finalise the PPPoE settings and 2:) had the static routes pointing down the wrong interface [10:49] 3mins34s downtime [10:50] cheer brycec, i did remember reading it and to email - still 10mbit is fine transatlantic [13:24] oh wow thats impressive [13:25] actually rebooted the router quite a few times because 5GHz wifi went weird adding VAPs - and i didn't disconnect further [15:51] grody: ssh kind of sucks for throughput [15:51] there's double windowing in there, so tcp/ip and ssh both have their own windows [15:52] that said 10 megabit still seems on the low side [16:16] *** dj_goku has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [16:17] *** dj_goku has joined #arpnetworks [16:19] Reliable network communication was such an invaluable advancement [16:20] what do you mean kelly? [16:21] got SQM working (codel) and also noticed pfSense has a Codel queue - be curious to see how this pans out [16:21] sweet grody [16:22] it's fq_codel right? [16:22] i can select fq_codel on the openwrt.. but pfsense seems to only do codel [16:22] maybe they're calling fq_codel codel [16:22] there's a fair queueing and a non fair queueing version iirc [16:23] i think it's doing fq on pppoe (that is for sure) and the pfsense WAN (into openwrt) is codel [16:23] need to load the network now to test [16:24] and it has a htb queue before the fq_codel on pppoe? [16:24] yeh load it :) [16:24] not sure tbh [16:24] there was only a few things to tinker with SQM [16:24] just test it then :) [16:25] ahh, i see.. i can add new types [16:25] nah, only have PPPoE assigned atm [16:26] pppoe doesn't usually limit bandwidth to connection speed [16:26] so it needs a queue before hand to limit the speed to what your modem or whatever can provide [16:28] done :> [16:28] now wtf to download/upload [16:28] windows 10 ? :) [16:44] actually having difficulties maxing things out here [16:45] just started a few torrents for latest ISOs, even have a few intensive port scans going on (to increase state tables) and still have can't max this out [16:46] TV is netflixing, playing PS3 online, just did a VoIP call and still no sign im maxing [16:46] how many megabit are you doing? [16:46] it peaked to 76 [16:47] what's your connection capable of? [16:47] but dropped a little to 60odd [16:47] 79.7/19.9 sync [16:47] yeh 76 is about your limit probably [16:47] get about 76/17 [16:47] with 61 megabit vdsl i can do about 57 [16:47] is your ping staying ok? [16:47] yea i've capped the shaper off at 75/15 [16:48] it fluctuated slightly, but pings have a high queue on the pfsense [16:48] ptm has higher overlead than ethernet still [16:48] but ic an't remember how it works [16:48] will check ISP CQM for LCP in a min [16:50] eek [16:50] looks like using codel on the pfsense has loaded it a tad too much [16:51] i didn't even know pfsense had codel [16:51] just do codel on the upload? [16:51] rate limiting incoming traffic sounds so messy : [16:52] it doesn't show up in the shaper wizard, i was poking at the queues and saw it as an option, along with the usual PRIQ, CBQ, FAIRQ etc. [16:52] YER A WIZARD grody [16:52] heh [16:52] BryceBot, no [16:52] Oh, okay... I'm sorry. 'thinking i should keep it on the pfsense' [16:52] hah wt [16:52] hey bryce was funny [16:52] https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=87931.0 [16:57] this cake thing sounds interesting [16:57] http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake [16:58] http://imgur.com/eQN1sbP,YiItfee#0 [16:59] yea, codel is savagin my CPU [16:59] the former orange peak in CPU was using PRIQ at 60mbit/s [16:59] weird i didn't find codel much cpu even with 10gbe+ [16:59] i wonder if it's freebsd locking related [17:00] how many cpu cores do you have? [17:00] i have buckets/dummynet as well [17:00] this is an acient thing (replacement en route) 700Mhz Nehemiah [17:00] pure routing, it can cope with about 170mbps [17:00] once i've dabbled, about 84 [17:00] ahh [17:01] so it's already borderline [17:01] it'd probably be faster with linux :) [17:01] yea [17:01] well, pfsense got real slow on this when they started using php-fpm [17:01] did you enable fastforwarding? [17:01] not yet.. there was a reason why i hadn't [17:01] oh wait.. that was the old rig [17:02] did you try intel ethernet card? [17:03] although at 100 megabit you shouldn't really need to have coalescing [17:03] there's also something to disable network random seeding or something [17:03] i dunno if pfsense does that already or what [17:04] but using a modern intel atom would make a world of difference anyway [17:04] http://imgur.com/llLPAOB [17:04] aye.. replacement is a duo2 2GHz [17:05] did look at atoms, but the prices were too high [17:06] least the LCP's didn't suffer too much, performance under load on the edge router is same as former [17:06] yeh that'd be fien too [17:06] i bought i3-3220 [17:07] i am waiting to hear from seller though [17:07] this nehemiah has served me very well for such low power [17:07] i had one of those [17:07] i didn't really like it [17:07] via c3-700? [17:08] but it was completely fanless [17:08] no psu fan no cpu fan. but noisy psu :/ [17:08] not 100% sure tbh [17:08] aye, entirely fanless [17:08] the electrical noise from fanless psu's can be annoying [17:08] the replacement has a single fan [17:08] mercutio: I mean packet send retry, transparent order preservation, that kind of thing [17:08] yeah so does mine i think, hp 6300 sff [17:08] TCP/IP in essence [17:09] yea, VIA C3 Centaur Hauls thing [17:09] kelly: like zmodem etc? [17:09] has padlock, so OpenVPN doesn't crap out CPU as much as it probably should [17:11] mercutio: That's more application layer than I'm thinking, but sure [17:11] The ability to dump bytes on a wire and get them out on the destination in order, and despite packetloss, is what I'm specifically talking about [17:12] i dunno lots of things do it [17:12] Yea, it's great [17:12] queueing has been a problem on tcp/ip for over 15 years. [17:20] *** atmark has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) [17:25] Gee you don't have to sound so surprised about it :P 16:50:26 mercutio | hey bryce was funny [17:25] well i don't see that every day :) [17:26] People don't say wizard every day :P [17:26] YER A WIZARD brycec [17:26] ahh [17:26] for some reason i thought it was all the caps [17:27] Totally different trigger than all the twss stuff [17:28] (and I'll leave it as an exercise for the audience to discover them all) [17:32] hmm apparently pppoe-ptm overhead is 27 bytes [17:34] it seems seems kind of high [17:36] s/seems/still/ [17:36] it still still kind of high [17:36] oh i only wanted the first one fixed and i didn't do g :/ [17:40] spam protection is still my fav so far, brycec [17:59] what's the spam protection one? [18:03] *** atmark has joined #arpnetworks [18:03] *** atmark is now known as Guest95570 [18:44] (spam/flood/abuse) [18:44] mercutio: because PHP's PCRE implementation has /g hard-coded. If you need/want non-greedy, /1 [18:45] (which is not a standard flag, but one I had to add so that the /g could be undone) [18:49] *** qbit is now known as litr [18:49] *** litr is now known as qbit [18:59] brycec: how lame of php! [19:04] (http://php.net/manual/en/regexp.reference.repetition.php) [19:16] still still same still [19:16] s/still/once/1 [19:16] once still same still [19:25] so yeah the /1 works [19:34] Once again, you don't have to sound so surprised that my code works :P [19:35] heh. [19:36] yeh i suppose i'm pessimistic :) [19:43] You're free to be pessimistic... about new features. /1 has been around for *years* and it's well tested. [19:45] http://imgur.com/fG1UljV,EpZk1T1,AZWyoGc,fm2xSC4#0 [19:45] yea, deffo need a new core [19:47] it crapped the pfsense so much between 1 & 2 it couldn't graph everything [19:51] *** grody has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) [19:51] heh [19:51] grody broke something? :) [20:02] *** grody has joined #arpnetworks [20:02] sweet getting two i3-3220s :) [20:05] brutal.. i kill the shaper on pfSense and it nuked WAN [20:05] *** dj_goku has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [20:07] yeah i figured you broke something :) [20:07] you know you want to just use linux :) [20:07] haha no thanks [20:08] i have pfsense doing exactly what i need [20:08] heh [20:08] their netowrk stuff is a bit behind [20:08] netgraph is kind of ick [20:08] yea it has its flaws [20:08] i've had the heater on all day and it's still cold [20:09] i've had the cooler on all day and it's still 24C in here :( [20:09] it actually says it's 20c in here [20:09] but it feels cold [20:09] @weather akl [20:09] Auckland International, New Zealand: Clear 50°F (10°C), Humidity: 71%, Wind: From the SSW at 4 MPH -- For more details including the forecast and almanac, see http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=-37.00805664,174.79167175 or re-request this with: @weather -v akl [20:09] that's not even that cold [20:46] @weather yyz [20:46] Toronto-Pearson International, Ontario: Clear 75°F (24°C), Humidity: 61%, Wind: From the North at 6 MPH -- For more details including the forecast and almanac, see http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=43.67722321,-79.63055420 or re-request this with: @weather -v yyz [21:14] geez [21:14] @weather 87114 [21:14] Albuquerque, NM: Partly Cloudy ☁ 64°F (17°C), Humidity: 77%, Wind: Calm -- For more details including the forecast and almanac, see http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=35.198917,-106.747849 or re-request this with: @weather -v 87114 [21:34] Today has been a glorious respite after a few weeks of 90F+ (32C+). I don't think today even broke 80F (26C), and it was grey and cloudy all day. [21:35] First day in a couple months that I could just leave the windows open all day comfortably. [21:35] @weather 99019 [21:35] Liberty Lake, WA: Partly Cloudy ☁ 70°F (21°C), Humidity: 74%, Wind: From the East at 2.9 MPH Gusting to 3.0 MPH -- For more details including the forecast and almanac, see http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=47.666508,-117.100792 or re-request this with: @weather -v 99019 [21:35] (Yesterday, it didn't reach ^ that temp until 1am) [22:00] are those underground links new? [22:05] LOL : This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 6.0 and above and Mozilla Firefox 3.0 and above. Screen Resolution = 1024 x 768. Browser Text Size = Medium. [22:44] don't think so? [23:09] people still suggest optimal viewing for sites? [23:17] mnathani: the "For more details..." bit? Nope, not at all new. [23:17] old site hasn't been updated i imagine [23:18] According to my logs, first appeared 1 June 2014