[01:49] *** mnathani has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [01:50] *** mnathani has joined #arpnetworks [07:45] https://openssl.org/news/secadv_20150709.txt [08:08] oh great. another possible zero-day attack. :( [08:10] yup [09:04] *** rendrag has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) [11:00] *** rendrag has joined #arpnetworks [12:52] *** jpalmer has joined #arpnetworks [13:07] does that mean another round of kvr host reboots?? [13:08] s/??/? [13:08] s/\?\?/\? [13:09] s/\\?\\?/\\? [13:09] does that mean another round of kvr host reboots\? [13:09] close enough [13:10] (yeah, escaping is weird as it turns out) [13:11] (and difficult) [13:11] (the difference between escaping input vs escaping within the regex...) [13:12] s/e/potatoes [13:12] You're a stinky cunt muncher, m0unds [13:12] lol [13:12] why thank you, BryceBot [13:13] Yeah, it has flood prevention too :p [13:17] does it have a pool of insults or just the one? [13:17] small pool [13:17] funny [15:09] so i finally caved in and got me a gigabit router/switch [15:10] only a cheapy thing to openwrt, but claims it can do 900mbps hardware nat [15:11] http://www.tp-link.com/en/products/details/cat-9_TL-WDR3600.html .. 800mbps sorry [15:12] grody: that can't do anything like gigabit with openwrt [15:12] more like 150megabit i think [15:12] for wan/lan [15:14] but at least you can switch fast [15:36] the wireless ac ones have faster cpus [15:37] i think i paid like $75 for the one i bought my inlaws [15:39] that's about how much the ac ones cost now i think [15:40] yea, this one's the same one you have iirc [15:40] c7 [15:40] ahh yeh so they have ok cpu [15:40] sort of [15:40] i wish they were like 2 or 3 faster cpu :) [15:40] yeah, for what it's supposed to do [15:40] hahaha [15:41] i dunno, i want to do tcp/ip acceleration / retermination [15:41] i just use pc as router and router for bridging wireless [15:42] QCA9558 dual-band, 3-stream 802.11n SoC / Atheros AR8327 switch / 128MB DDR2 / 8MB Flash [15:44] nice [15:44] oh 802.11n? [15:44] that's in the C7 [15:45] yeh it's ac [15:45] why does it say 802.11n? :) [15:45] idk [15:45] 3600 is ar9344 it seems [15:45] hmm archer c7 has 16 mb of flash in v2 [15:46] and qca9880 [15:48] actually 9558 isn't much faster than 9344 [15:49] there's 802.11ad chips from atheros now apparently [15:49] http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Wireless-DW1601-QCA9005-8V256-WiGig-802-11AD-7Gbps-Half-Mini-Wireless-Card-/251802031092?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3aa09213f4 [15:49] they're not even expensive to get mini pci-e cards! [15:50] werid that doesn't support ac or does it? [15:51] huh, dunno [16:00] mercutio, its more the wifi on it im hoping will be semi decent [16:01] just concerned open wont suffice and have to use dd-wrt (have seen a version for it) - will delicate it to pure bridge/switch then [16:01] delegate* [16:01] no need for ac atm [16:01] not all my devices do 5GHz yet [16:02] use gargoyle? [16:05] my cellphone doesnt' do 5 ghz [16:05] i was surprised even on single stream 2.4 it did 45 megabit speedtest [16:06] but newer devices seem to be taking more of the limited bandwidth [16:07] phones do, tablets do.. laptops don't [16:07] hmm [16:08] never seen that before [16:08] my laptop does about 250 megabit with udp i think [16:08] with 300 megabit max [16:08] usually build my own openwrt [16:08] cool [16:08] i should do that really :/ [16:08] my phone does 433mbit on 5ghz [16:08] yea, on similar hardware, dd wins hands down for wifi performance vs. open [16:08] openwrt is a pita on archer c7 [16:08] i think my macbook does too [16:08] my tablet does that m0unds [16:08] macbok may be 866 [16:09] on a wdr841nd i can get 96mbps wire speed off the wifi on 2.4GHz [16:09] 2012 vintage [16:09] openwrt i get abot 40 [16:09] both forced HT40 too [16:09] grody: i had to use a different blob and dev oepnwrt to get 400 to 500 megabit/sec out of wireless ac on archer c7 [16:09] where native does 600 megabit [16:09] that's bridging two together, so 1.3 gigabit line rate or whatever [16:09] nice [16:10] i got about that too grody [16:10] ie it was saturating the 100 megabit ethernet [16:10] oh i wonder where that device is :) [16:10] what i want to try is doing less acking [16:11] because wifi is half duplex tcp acking every second packet should impair performance [16:11] hmm, if 150mbps NAT on Open is about what'd it, what if it were pure routed? [16:11] i really hate that android's app backup stuff seems to be completely broken w/gapps accts [16:11] but in order to do that seemlessly need to do it on router :/ [16:11] PPPoE WAN to LAN no NAT, firewalling or QoS [16:11] (similar to what i do atm) [16:11] and terminating tcp session on router is slow [16:11] you'd have to try grody [16:12] i reckon 250 megabit is about your peak limit with tweaking [16:12] the 841nd handles the 79/19 easy [16:12] oh pppoe [16:12] well it's the same cpu as rb2011 i think [16:12] but i'd want the PPPoE WAN > Port1 > pfSense > Port2 > wifi bridge w/ VLANs [16:12] using recent kernel? [16:13] vlans are done on the switch afaiak [16:13] 3.18.14 [16:13] so no cpu overhead for them [16:13] yeh that shoudl be good [16:13] there was some improvements a while back [16:13] kept the stock firmware, as the wifi on that was quite amazing [16:13] laptop did 103mbps on 2.4GHz [16:13] 79 megabit is a lot easier than 300 megabit :) [16:14] i kind of wish they'd just stick 2 ghz cpu's in [16:14] and stop doing offload :/ [16:14] aye.. ideally this router will future proof me for FTTP (upto 300mbps) [16:14] heh yea [16:15] if USB etherner wasn't so w**k i'd use my pogoplug as a router.. 256MB RAM 1.2GHz CPU and can handle routed traffic quite well [16:15] that sits with a gigabit port, so bouncing back traffic through a VLAN would be doable [16:15] would need a smart switch though [16:16] i think the cpus are weak in cache [16:17] but like 100 megabit nat you can do on p75 :) [16:17] of course that's cisc.. [16:17] and cpu speed seems to make a difference [16:17] err cpu mhz does [16:17] you can actually overclock some [16:17] http://pastebin.com/MW6LYLQf [16:17] i've never tried it just read about it [16:17] yea, 16kb L1 and 256KB L2 [16:18] but it seemed to boost throughput more than it should [16:18] ie it's cpu bound [16:18] this thing handles well for an old board [16:18] not bus bound or such [16:18] have one acting as a backup mail relay [16:18] is l1 cache 8k split data instruction? [16:18] i wonder how complex the forward path is on linux [16:18] L1 Data cache = 16 KB. 4-Way, 32 B/line. [16:18] L1 Instruction cache = 16 KB, 4-Way, 32 B/line.. [16:19] http://www.7-cpu.com/cpu/Kirkwood.html [16:19] you'd think it could stay in l1 cache for forwarding [16:19] but hard to know [16:21] need to get a new thin/apu for pfsense too [16:21] so much stuff to choose from and getting something decent at a good price is hard [16:23] go second hand [16:23] i'm hoping to bid tomorrow on i3-2120 [16:24] i want to shift my routing stuff off my server and stick dual ethernet card in it and plug straight into modems [16:26] Why not OPNsense, grody ? [16:28] brycec, used it for 5+ years, i know it [16:28] have looked at bsdrp (or something) too [16:28] but meh [16:28] i've gotten to ♥ pfsense' quirks [16:28] hmm.. Dell-Wyse-R90L [16:29] has gigabit ethernet.. could simply bounce traffic back and force over port and tagged vlans [16:30] my neoware ca10 (ancient thing) can actually handle 122mbps routed and 75 (at least) NAT [16:30] can do 47mbps openvpn too [16:31] but it also routed traffic between two virtal wireless networks - and it gets kinda hot when everything is going on [16:47] I've become rather disillusioned with pfSense's management and direction, but I like OPNsense and their fork of it. [17:33] so, I'm at a place that thinks that a shot of alcohol is about 6 oz, like it was a beer thing. [17:34] they charge 14 BRL for it, but that's about 3.5 USD [17:34] so I'm making out like a bandit [17:34] ... https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153078738704372&set=a.453592139371.245979.504874371&type=1&theater¬if_t=like [17:42] thats all alcohol, no mixer? [17:42] shot here is 25ml (double 50ml) - costs vary but for most things (decentish) start at about £3 (GBP) [17:43] Viva Brazil, or something :p [17:43] although cheap pub here sells double grey goose for 4.05 [17:44] free mixer [17:44] yeah [17:44] that's what makes it crazy [17:51] how much is 6 oz? :) [17:51] oh wow! [17:52] so how many shots did you do randal? :) [17:53] I had three drinks. I think that means I had 15 shots or so [17:53] heh [17:53] a shot is normally 60 mls here i think [17:53] Sounds right, about 2oz [17:54] when you mix your own drinks i tend to find it means you start with like 1:5 [17:54] and shift to like 1:1 [17:54] a shot is typically about 1.5 oz [17:55] heading to my room... hopefully internet active there. [17:56] Good luck [17:56] in brazil? [17:57] actually that looks like more than 6 oz [18:07] seems reasonable to me [20:30] does it make sense to create a FreeNAS Virtual Machine, with virtual disks residing on separate physical disks for the purpose of mirroring / RAID 10 redundancy. How difficult would it be to rebuild the RAID upon failure of one of the physical disks? [20:32] Relatively few VM solutions support hotplugging disks, so that's an issue. You'd also have to rebuild the drive before you could feed it back into kvm/qemu/whatnot [20:32] ie. new partition table, recreate volumes/containers on it, files if necessary, etc [20:32] yea, i'd say that's something best left to the host box [20:32] Or best left to pass through the physical devices [20:33] * brycec sits still and complies [20:33] wrong channel >.> [20:36] k [21:09] whats a popular disk i/o benchmark on windows [21:09] https://www.raymond.cc/blog/measure-actual-hard-disk-perfomance-under-windows/ found that<< but its 2 years old [21:12] that's the only one i've seen [21:12] there's another tool that maps out i/o latency [21:12] don't remember the name of it though [21:16] oh, there's also iometer, but it's hosted on sf [21:16] and sf is shady nowadays [21:19] https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc742157.aspx there's also winsat [21:23] https://gist.github.com/mnathani/9442e1e00e2ed32b89b6 [21:23] Gist: "SSD Performance Benchmark - CrystalDiskMark 4.1.0 x64" [22:48] *** mnathani_ has quit IRC ()