#arpnetworks 2015-07-09,Thu

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
***mnathani has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
mnathani has joined #arpnetworks
[01:49]
........................................................................ (idle for 5h55mn)
m0undshttps://openssl.org/news/secadv_20150709.txt [07:45]
..... (idle for 23mn)
RandalSchwartzoh great. another possible zero-day attack. :( [08:08]
m0undsyup [08:10]
........... (idle for 54mn)
***rendrag has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) [09:04]
........................ (idle for 1h56mn)
rendrag has joined #arpnetworks [11:00]
....................... (idle for 1h52mn)
jpalmer has joined #arpnetworks [12:52]
.... (idle for 15mn)
mnathani_does that mean another round of kvr host reboots??
s/??/?
s/??/?
s/\?\?/\?
[13:07]
BryceBot<mnathani_> does that mean another round of kvr host reboots? [13:09]
mnathani_close enough [13:09]
brycec(yeah, escaping is weird as it turns out)
(and difficult)
(the difference between escaping input vs escaping within the regex...)
[13:10]
m0undss/e/potatoes [13:12]
BryceBotYou're a stinky cunt muncher, m0unds [13:12]
m0undslol
why thank you, BryceBot
[13:12]
brycecYeah, it has flood prevention too :p [13:13]
m0undsdoes it have a pool of insults or just the one? [13:17]
brycecsmall pool [13:17]
m0undsfunny [13:17]
....................... (idle for 1h52mn)
grodyso i finally caved in and got me a gigabit router/switch
only a cheapy thing to openwrt, but claims it can do 900mbps hardware nat
http://www.tp-link.com/en/products/details/cat-9_TL-WDR3600.html .. 800mbps sorry
[15:09]
mercutiogrody: that can't do anything like gigabit with openwrt
more like 150megabit i think
for wan/lan
but at least you can switch fast
[15:12]
..... (idle for 22mn)
the wireless ac ones have faster cpus [15:36]
m0undsi think i paid like $75 for the one i bought my inlaws [15:37]
mercutiothat's about how much the ac ones cost now i think [15:39]
m0undsyea, this one's the same one you have iirc
c7
[15:40]
mercutioahh yeh so they have ok cpu
sort of
i wish they were like 2 or 3 faster cpu :)
[15:40]
m0undsyeah, for what it's supposed to do
hahaha
[15:40]
mercutioi dunno, i want to do tcp/ip acceleration / retermination
i just use pc as router and router for bridging wireless
[15:41]
m0undsQCA9558 dual-band, 3-stream 802.11n SoC / Atheros AR8327 switch / 128MB DDR2 / 8MB Flash [15:42]
mercutionice
oh 802.11n?
[15:44]
m0undsthat's in the C7 [15:44]
mercutioyeh it's ac
why does it say 802.11n? :)
[15:45]
m0undsidk [15:45]
mercutio3600 is ar9344 it seems
hmm archer c7 has 16 mb of flash in v2
and qca9880
actually 9558 isn't much faster than 9344
there's 802.11ad chips from atheros now apparently
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-Wireless-DW1601-QCA9005-8V256-WiGig-802-11AD-7Gbps-Half-Mini-Wireless-Card-/251802031092?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3aa09213f4
they're not even expensive to get mini pci-e cards!
werid that doesn't support ac or does it?
[15:45]
m0undshuh, dunno [15:51]
grodymercutio, its more the wifi on it im hoping will be semi decent
just concerned open wont suffice and have to use dd-wrt (have seen a version for it) - will delicate it to pure bridge/switch then
delegate*
no need for ac atm
not all my devices do 5GHz yet
[16:00]
mercutiouse gargoyle?
my cellphone doesnt' do 5 ghz
i was surprised even on single stream 2.4 it did 45 megabit speedtest
but newer devices seem to be taking more of the limited bandwidth
[16:02]
grodyphones do, tablets do.. laptops don't
hmm
never seen that before
[16:07]
mercutiomy laptop does about 250 megabit with udp i think
with 300 megabit max
[16:08]
grodyusually build my own openwrt [16:08]
mercutiocool
i should do that really :/
[16:08]
m0undsmy phone does 433mbit on 5ghz [16:08]
grodyyea, on similar hardware, dd wins hands down for wifi performance vs. open [16:08]
mercutioopenwrt is a pita on archer c7 [16:08]
m0undsi think my macbook does too [16:08]
mercutiomy tablet does that m0unds
macbok may be 866
[16:08]
grodyon a wdr841nd i can get 96mbps wire speed off the wifi on 2.4GHz [16:09]
m0unds2012 vintage [16:09]
grodyopenwrt i get abot 40
both forced HT40 too
[16:09]
mercutiogrody: i had to use a different blob and dev oepnwrt to get 400 to 500 megabit/sec out of wireless ac on archer c7
where native does 600 megabit
that's bridging two together, so 1.3 gigabit line rate or whatever
[16:09]
grodynice [16:09]
mercutioi got about that too grody
ie it was saturating the 100 megabit ethernet
oh i wonder where that device is :)
what i want to try is doing less acking
because wifi is half duplex tcp acking every second packet should impair performance
[16:10]
grodyhmm, if 150mbps NAT on Open is about what'd it, what if it were pure routed? [16:11]
m0undsi really hate that android's app backup stuff seems to be completely broken w/gapps accts [16:11]
mercutiobut in order to do that seemlessly need to do it on router :/ [16:11]
grodyPPPoE WAN to LAN no NAT, firewalling or QoS
(similar to what i do atm)
[16:11]
mercutioand terminating tcp session on router is slow
you'd have to try grody
i reckon 250 megabit is about your peak limit with tweaking
[16:11]
grodythe 841nd handles the 79/19 easy [16:12]
mercutiooh pppoe
well it's the same cpu as rb2011 i think
[16:12]
grodybut i'd want the PPPoE WAN > Port1 > pfSense > Port2 > wifi bridge w/ VLANs [16:12]
mercutiousing recent kernel?
vlans are done on the switch afaiak
[16:12]
grody3.18.14 [16:13]
mercutioso no cpu overhead for them
yeh that shoudl be good
there was some improvements a while back
[16:13]
grodykept the stock firmware, as the wifi on that was quite amazing
laptop did 103mbps on 2.4GHz
[16:13]
mercutio79 megabit is a lot easier than 300 megabit :)
i kind of wish they'd just stick 2 ghz cpu's in
and stop doing offload :/
[16:13]
grodyaye.. ideally this router will future proof me for FTTP (upto 300mbps)
heh yea
if USB etherner wasn't so w**k i'd use my pogoplug as a router.. 256MB RAM 1.2GHz CPU and can handle routed traffic quite well
that sits with a gigabit port, so bouncing back traffic through a VLAN would be doable
would need a smart switch though
[16:14]
mercutioi think the cpus are weak in cache
but like 100 megabit nat you can do on p75 :)
of course that's cisc..
and cpu speed seems to make a difference
err cpu mhz does
you can actually overclock some
[16:16]
grodyhttp://pastebin.com/MW6LYLQf [16:17]
mercutioi've never tried it just read about it [16:17]
grodyyea, 16kb L1 and 256KB L2 [16:17]
mercutiobut it seemed to boost throughput more than it should
ie it's cpu bound
[16:18]
grodythis thing handles well for an old board [16:18]
mercutionot bus bound or such [16:18]
grodyhave one acting as a backup mail relay [16:18]
mercutiois l1 cache 8k split data instruction?
i wonder how complex the forward path is on linux
[16:18]
grodyL1 Data cache = 16 KB. 4-Way, 32 B/line.
L1 Instruction cache = 16 KB, 4-Way, 32 B/line..
http://www.7-cpu.com/cpu/Kirkwood.html
[16:18]
mercutioyou'd think it could stay in l1 cache for forwarding
but hard to know
[16:19]
grodyneed to get a new thin/apu for pfsense too
so much stuff to choose from and getting something decent at a good price is hard
[16:21]
mercutiogo second hand
i'm hoping to bid tomorrow on i3-2120
i want to shift my routing stuff off my server and stick dual ethernet card in it and plug straight into modems
[16:23]
brycecWhy not OPNsense, grody ? [16:26]
grodybrycec, used it for 5+ years, i know it
have looked at bsdrp (or something) too
but meh
i've gotten to ♥ pfsense' quirks
hmm.. Dell-Wyse-R90L
has gigabit ethernet.. could simply bounce traffic back and force over port and tagged vlans
my neoware ca10 (ancient thing) can actually handle 122mbps routed and 75 (at least) NAT
can do 47mbps openvpn too
but it also routed traffic between two virtal wireless networks - and it gets kinda hot when everything is going on
[16:28]
.... (idle for 16mn)
brycecI've become rather disillusioned with pfSense's management and direction, but I like OPNsense and their fork of it. [16:47]
.......... (idle for 46mn)
RandalSchwartzso, I'm at a place that thinks that a shot of alcohol is about 6 oz, like it was a beer thing.
they charge 14 BRL for it, but that's about 3.5 USD
so I'm making out like a bandit
... https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153078738704372&set=a.453592139371.245979.504874371&type=1&theater&notif_t=like
[17:33]
grodythats all alcohol, no mixer?
shot here is 25ml (double 50ml) - costs vary but for most things (decentish) start at about £3 (GBP)
[17:42]
brycecViva Brazil, or something :p [17:43]
grodyalthough cheap pub here sells double grey goose for 4.05
free mixer
[17:43]
RandalSchwartzyeah
that's what makes it crazy
[17:44]
mercutiohow much is 6 oz? :)
oh wow!
so how many shots did you do randal? :)
[17:51]
RandalSchwartzI had three drinks. I think that means I had 15 shots or so [17:53]
mercutioheh
a shot is normally 60 mls here i think
[17:53]
brycecSounds right, about 2oz [17:53]
mercutiowhen you mix your own drinks i tend to find it means you start with like 1:5
and shift to like 1:1
[17:54]
RandalSchwartza shot is typically about 1.5 oz
heading to my room... hopefully internet active there.
[17:54]
brycecGood luck [17:56]
mercutioin brazil?
actually that looks like more than 6 oz
[17:56]
m0undsseems reasonable to me [18:07]
............................. (idle for 2h23mn)
mnathani_does it make sense to create a FreeNAS Virtual Machine, with virtual disks residing on separate physical disks for the purpose of mirroring / RAID 10 redundancy. How difficult would it be to rebuild the RAID upon failure of one of the physical disks? [20:30]
brycecRelatively few VM solutions support hotplugging disks, so that's an issue. You'd also have to rebuild the drive before you could feed it back into kvm/qemu/whatnot
ie. new partition table, recreate volumes/containers on it, files if necessary, etc
[20:32]
m0undsyea, i'd say that's something best left to the host box [20:32]
brycecOr best left to pass through the physical devices
brycec sits still and complies
wrong channel >.>
[20:32]
mnathani_k [20:36]
....... (idle for 33mn)
whats a popular disk i/o benchmark on windows
https://www.raymond.cc/blog/measure-actual-hard-disk-perfomance-under-windows/ found that<< but its 2 years old
[21:09]
m0undsthat's the only one i've seen
there's another tool that maps out i/o latency
don't remember the name of it though
oh, there's also iometer, but it's hosted on sf
and sf is shady nowadays
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc742157.aspx there's also winsat
[21:12]
mnathani_https://gist.github.com/mnathani/9442e1e00e2ed32b89b6 [21:23]
BryceBotGist: "SSD Performance Benchmark - CrystalDiskMark 4.1.0 x64" [21:23]
.................. (idle for 1h25mn)
***mnathani_ has quit IRC () [22:48]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)