#arpnetworks 2014-12-09,Tue

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
up_the_ironsmercutio: news.arpnetworks.com is rockin' ;) [00:30]
mercutioyeh i checked it out again before [00:30]
up_the_ironsmercutio: nice uptime, what does that server do?
i still have you beat though
[00:31]
BryceBotThat's what she said!! [00:31]
up_the_irons$ ssh kvr06 uptime
23:16:57 up 1777 days, 21:10, 1 user, load average: 1.71, 1.76, 1.95
$
[00:31]
mercutioup_the_irons: routing. [00:31]
up_the_ironsah [00:31]
mercutioso yeh no real reason to stay current
i reckon news could have a nicer colour scheme
the grey on white is a bit ick to read
[00:32]
up_the_ironsdamn
i actually thought that scheme was good
[00:33]
mercutioit may depend on monitor [00:33]
up_the_ironshmm.. it doesn't look grey on white to me [00:33]
mercutiohangon i'll try on the other monitor
it looks diff on the other monitor
easier to read, but it still is not enough contrast diff really
[00:33]
up_the_ironsguess i need to work on that [00:35]
mercutiocould add some blue to it
http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/articles/an-introduction-to-color-theory-for-web-designers--webdesign-1437
hmm
blue for urls seems pretty common
i'm not sure why some of the items are sort of greyed out
http://202.49.71.24:24/arpnews.png
that's what it looks like to me
i dunno if it looks diff in diff browers.
browsers
[00:35]
.... (idle for 16mn)
up_the_ironsmercutio: i believe the greyed out ones are the ones you've already clicked on [00:57]
mercutioahh
yeah looks to be that way
i'd prefer it if background colour changed instead
[00:57]
..... (idle for 23mn)
***Seji has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) [01:21]
.... (idle for 18mn)
Seji has joined #arpnetworks
Seji has quit IRC (Client Quit)
[01:39]
............................... (idle for 2h33mn)
hive-mind has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) [04:15]
hive-mind has joined #arpnetworks [04:21]
................ (idle for 1h19mn)
Seji has joined #arpnetworks [05:40]
........... (idle for 52mn)
dj_goku has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [06:32]
...................... (idle for 1h46mn)
Guest83331 has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 1.0.1)
jpalmer has joined #arpnetworks
[08:18]
........................................................... (idle for 4h50mn)
mercutiohmm ubuntu is doing something with docker called snappy ubuntu core
with hosting by azure
[13:08]
mike-burnsWhat a fun time for them. [13:13]
mercutioseems to be a strong surge in interest of docker type solutions recently [13:14]
........... (idle for 53mn)
***Seji has quit IRC (Write error: Connection reset by peer)
Seji has joined #arpnetworks
[14:07]
............. (idle for 1h1mn)
mercutiohow nice not to run bind [15:09]
staticsafeim dependent on BIND's DNSSEC maintenance abilities
(also, I like the config format)
[15:14]
mercutioyou saw about the new vulnerability? [15:26]
staticsafeyes [15:27]
mercutiocool [15:27]
staticsafeservers are already patched [15:27]
mercutiobind 9 was meant to fix security i thought
actually the X security stuff is pretty bad
[15:27]
staticsafeyou can't completely fix security in a code base as big as BIND
(and as old)
[15:27]
mercutioremove features!
bind9 is rewite i tahink
rewrite
at least lots of refactoring
[15:27]
staticsafemercutio: yeah
BIND 9 is 14 years old at this point
[15:28]
plettISC tried starting over with BIND10, that didn't go well [15:30]
staticsafeyea, they abandoned the project [15:30]
mercutiooh is it 10 they were doing that with
i used bind4 for a while
[15:31]
staticsafe10 is a complete rewrite as well [15:32]
plettOh yeah, I remember 4. 8 was a massive improvement [15:32]
staticsafeanyways I'm relatively new to the world of hosting DNS, so BIND's notoriety is just a bunch of old tales to me :P [15:33]
plettDespite 8 still being awful :) [15:33]
staticsafethough I could technically use other software like NSD for my slaves (the DNSSEC functionality only needs to be on the master) but I like consistency [15:39]
.................................... (idle for 2h59mn)
mnathanido folks in here think systemd is evil (like some other fine folks over at the NANOG mailing lists) [18:38]
jbergstroemmnathani: not sure what's most troll -- bringing it up or replying :) [18:43]
mnathaniI guess I am trying to determine if the argument has merit [18:44]
.... (idle for 15mn)
jbergstroemmnathani: irc is not the place for that [18:59]
..... (idle for 22mn)
mercutioi slightly like systemd mnathani
but it's like one of those dirty pleasures, like liking object orientation.
complexity rises, but it can simplify things.
jbergstroem: i think it's anything goes in here for the most part. there's heaps of off topic conversation, and it makes people look friendly when they say stuff for anyone random coming in.
rather than it's just a barren wasteland.
[19:21]
jbergstroemmercutio: didn't really mean anything with it other than some slight sarcasm. having a objective discussion on irc is not something you come by often :) [19:23]
mercutiohe asked a subjective question though.
objective discussions don't really work in computer science and any derivitive of such.
objectively computers are just lots of transistors.
the assumed context on here would be for servers, and .. systemd means some upset, as software packages have to include yet another method to do stuff. it's not that difficult to setup for packages themself, ... but the systemd architecture as a whole is usually what's criticised.
it's that it's starting to include more and more extensions, and create another operating system metaphore of kinds for running containers at the last on it's own.
the idea of containers seems to be quite popular at the moment.
and some things like having an inbuilt dhcp server - if you want to have hundreds and hundreds of servers and can minimise external dependencies, latency etc, it opens up the possibility of starting vm's on demand to run specific programs.
but because it includes such functionality, people get upset that there is micro implementations of various things that can be replaced with other things, because the scope shouldn't include it because sysvinit didn't include anything like that.
[19:24]
BryceBotget on up
and DANCE
BryceBot dances :D-<
BryceBot dances :D|-<
BryceBot dances :D/-<
[19:28]
...... (idle for 28mn)
***dj_goku has joined #arpnetworks [19:56]
mercutiohmm systemd just added pppoe support [19:58]
jbergstroemamong other things
mercutio: in preparation for not depending on pppd for next release
[20:02]
acf_> 19:58 < mercutio> hmm systemd just added pppoe support
well crap
[20:10]
***hazardous has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [20:14]
hazardous has joined #arpnetworks
DaCa has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
[20:20]
........................ (idle for 1h59mn)
DaCa has joined #arpnetworks [22:22]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)