#arpnetworks 2014-08-20,Wed

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
up_the_ironsRandalSchwartz: we do freebsd 10 with virtio, by default
mnathani: it tends to do the job. v6 traffic is still pretty low.
[01:37]
........ (idle for 38mn)
***pyvpx has joined #arpnetworks [02:15]
.............................. (idle for 2h29mn)
RandalSchwartzcool...when I get to 10, that'll be nice. [04:44]
...... (idle for 27mn)
mhoranOoh. That's a reason to upgrade. [05:11]
.................. (idle for 1h27mn)
mus1cboxso ipv4 is routed with actual routers then? [06:38]
mhoranCisco 6500 with a Sup720-3BXL. [06:42]
...................... (idle for 1h46mn)
erratichey i have kind of a stupid network question
actually hold on, brb
[08:28]
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/74492b16f2373448639d [08:38]
BryceBotError fetching information for https://gist.github.com/anonymous/74492b16f2373448639d: Request timed out [08:38]
erraticthe computer that has 206.125.168.69 is masqueraded and also has a route into the 172.16.40/0 network hence I'm able to ping it and should in theory be able to use it as a masqueraded gateway if I can set it as the default route
and I thought I've seen ISPs setup shit this way before where you used an upstream router as the default gateway but I guess I could be wrong about that
Im wondering if the client's hosts netmask has something to do with it
[08:40]
anterratic: if i understand that correctly, your client is not directly connected to .69. thus you cannot use it as the default gw [08:42]
erraticoooo!
I just got it to work
lol
sort of!
ifconfig eth0 172.16.40.2 netmask 128.0.0.0
route add -net 206.125.168.68 netmask 255.255.255.252 gw 172.16.40.1
route add default gw 206.125.168.69
^ worked
but
well i mean it allowed me to do that, it doesn't work
not sure why, will check in a min
[08:42]
antthat netmask is bogus
i mean the 128.0.0.0 one
i means that half of the internet is in the same network as 172.16.40.2
[08:44]
..... (idle for 21mn)
erraticyeah I'm never doing that again
it fucked up something with the virtual switch and now networking doesn't work at all lol
RIP
wow, yeah it really messed it up
I wonder what happened
[09:07]
RIP hypervisor
actually now that I think of it I think my boss managed to screw up a hypervisor I had setup like this
so i guess I should keep it on
so I can figure out whats actually going on
this is annoying
I have a virbr (host-only) that won't work now because of something I did, neither shutting down the VMs and the virbr network is fixing it
[09:19]
..... (idle for 22mn)
brycecThat still requires host support, correct? And as I recall, kvr02 is pretty old, predating that support. │01:36:31 @up_the_irons | RandalSchwartz: we do freebsd 10 with virtio, by default
erratic: Like ant said, your default route must be your next-hop, meaning something you are "directly" attached to (within the same subnet as the interface's address).
You'll either need to tunnel/vpn to that network, adding an additional interface on your box with an address within that subnet (eg tun0, or a gif tunnel), or set to route traffic from 172.16.40.2 through 206.125.168.69
And as is often the case in these overly-complicated scenarios... What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
[09:43]
erraticbrycec: not disputing that anymore I came to terms with it already [09:49]
bryceclol [09:49]
erraticI have some other things that are kinda broken atm [09:50]
brycecI imagine declaring half the Internet can be found on your host would break some things, yes :p (Thankfully, not a BGP announce) [09:51]
erraticgoing to eat, bbiab [09:51]
RandalSchwartzRandalSchwartz waits for erratic to return [10:01]
brycecs/$/ with food for everybody/ [10:02]
BryceBot>>> RandalSchwartz waits for erratic to return with food for everybody [10:02]
***qbit has quit IRC (Quit: leaving) [10:09]
mus1cboxmhoran: phew, i'm glad arp isn't routing ipv4 through anything but dedicated networking hardware [10:21]
.... (idle for 16mn)
brycecmus1cbox: fwiw there is a hardware router for v6, but since the current router is still doing just fine, ARP keeps using that [10:37]
m0undss/i/potatos [10:38]
BryceBot<brycec> mus1cbox: fwpotatosw there potatoss a hardware router for v6, but spotatosnce the current router potatoss stpotatosll dopotatosng just fpotatosne, ARP keeps uspotatosng that [10:38]
brycec-.- [10:39]
m0undsand i always spell potatoes wrong [10:39]
RandalSchwartzs/potatoes/tomatoes/ [10:49]
BryceBot<m0unds> and i always spell tomatoes wrong [10:49]
staticsafeBryceBot is the best [10:51]
RandalSchwartzs/b/w/ [10:51]
BryceBot<staticsafe> BryceBot is the west [10:51]
brycec*West
(proper noun)
[10:52]
mus1cboxpotatoes is correct [10:56]
***qbit has joined #arpnetworks
qbit is now known as Guest54650
Guest54650 is now known as qbit
[11:07]
........ (idle for 38mn)
RandalSchwartzso uncertain of name!
maybe simultaeously both :)
[11:47]
m0undsmus1cbox: look at my command, i spelled it potatos
s/o/potatoes
[12:00]
BryceBot<m0unds> mus1cbpotatoesx: lpotatoespotatoesk at my cpotatoesmmand, i spelled it ppotatoestatpotatoess [12:01]
mus1cboxit's spelled potatoes [12:02]
m0undsi know it is
and i spelled it wrong the first time
and then i corrected it the second time
which is why i said "i keep spelling it wrong"
because i did
s/did/do
[12:14]
BryceBot<m0unds> because i do [12:15]
................................ (idle for 2h36mn)
***m0unds has quit IRC (Quit: argh) [14:51]
mus1cboxpotatoes [14:51]
brycecs/./potatoes/ [14:52]
BryceBot<mus1cbox> potatoespotatoespotatoespotatoespotatoespotatoespotatoespotatoes [14:52]
***m0unds has joined #arpnetworks [15:05]
................. (idle for 1h21mn)
mnathaniup_the_irons: does the openbsd vps that does all ipv6 routing have separate interfaces for each VLAN it routes traffic for, or does it have a single trunk interface and splits the VLans / does the routing accordingly? I have never used OpenBSD for IPv6 routing before. [16:26]
up_the_ironssingle trunk interface
openbsd supports a vlan sub-interface / virtual interface, which is where the traffic is split off
[16:27]
brycecie em0_vlan1
Much the same as Linux does eth0.1
Does Windows support VLAN interfaces? It occurs to me I've never noticed an option to set that up (whereas I know exactly how in BSD, Linux, and even OSX)
[16:28]
m0undsi think it's driver-dependent
modern intel chipsets support vlan tagging on windows if you elect to install adv network svcs iirc
someone brought bags of lays "special flavor" potato chips - wasabi ginger, mango salsa and...cappucino
[16:36]
***tellnes has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) [16:50]
tellnes has joined #arpnetworks [16:56]
........ (idle for 36mn)
mus1cboxlol [17:32]
........ (idle for 35mn)
RandalSchwartzugh. lays. carbs, but worse.. cooked in bad oils.
soy, canola, corn oil. avoid at all costs.
[18:07]
m0undsi worry less about the oil and more about the flavorants, tbh [18:11]
RandalSchwartztbh ? [18:12]
m0undsto be honest [18:12]
RandalSchwartzoh
well - the oils are still bad too.
[18:12]
m0undsi can't find their damned nutritional stuff or ingredient statements [18:12]
RandalSchwartz... http://authoritynutrition.com/6-reasons-why-vegetable-oils-are-toxic/ [18:13]
m0undsanything in moderation isn't going to kill you - i can find studies that says coconut oil is terrible for you, but it doesn't mean that it's bad in any quantity [18:14]
RandalSchwartzshards of broken glass in moderation will indeed kill you
I detest "in moderation" as a qualifier
since it leaves unspoken what "moderation" means for each item.
[18:15]
m0undsm0unds isn't a nutritionist [18:17]
RandalSchwartzcarbs above 100g/day would be considered by most "in moderation", and yet much recent evidence points to that being causitive (for most normal people) of metabolic syndrome.
I'm not formally trained in nutrition, but I'm not formally trained in programming either. :)
[18:17]
.... (idle for 17mn)
m0undsi'd assume moderation would meant "not significantly more of something than something else" e.g. eating an apple is great, eating 5 apples isn't so great; using coconut oil as a cooking oil is great, eating 5TBsp of it a day isn't
eating glass will probably hurt you, but if you're eating glass...well...good luck?
[18:34]
RandalSchwartzfear of coconut oil is derived from a fear of saturated fats
that has since been discounted
so coconut oil has a *lot* of useful properties. I put a teaspoon in my morning tea.
[18:37]
... http://authoritynutrition.com/top-10-evidence-based-health-benefits-of-coconut-oil/ [18:42]
..... (idle for 24mn)
m0undsi don't have anything against it, i use it regularly
little disingenuous for that dude to talk about the metabolic byproducts of it as an antimicrobial agent when the study he's citing used it topically
oh well
[19:06]
RandalSchwartzcompared to most bloggers, he's a lot better source though
since he's pretty good at citing studies.
my position is from synthesizing about 150 blogs, many by doctors who are challenging the status quo.
[19:08]
.......... (idle for 48mn)
***CESSMASTER has joined #arpnetworks [19:57]
...... (idle for 25mn)
CESSMASTER has left [20:22]
....................... (idle for 1h54mn)
m0unds has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [22:16]
m0unds has joined #arpnetworks [22:21]
m0undsstupid freenode [22:21]
brycecredundant redundancy [22:23]
m0undsdept of redundancy dept, welcome, welcome [22:26]
............ (idle for 58mn)
antRandalSchwartz: http://www.columbia.edu/~fdc/utf8/index.html#glass [23:24]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)