***: phlux1 has joined #arpnetworks
milki_ has joined #arpnetworks
tellnes_ has joined #arpnetworks
treshoem2 has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
milki has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
pcn has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
mercutio has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
tellnes has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
tellnes_ is now known as tellnes
carvite has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
phlux has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
carvite_ is now known as carvite
gizmoguy has joined #arpnetworks
treshoem2 has joined #arpnetworks
pcn has joined #arpnetworks
mercutio has joined #arpnetworks m0unds: up_the_irons: yeah, in the case of my pair of chassis, it's reserving for two additional supervisors, rather than just the standard single redundant sup
so...500W for one Sup2T, then reserving ~1000W for two more
I think it's a bug
also, yup, MX80 = 372W
also does N+1 PSUs rather than quasi-redundant power supplies like in cisco gear - they load share, and you can power the whole device off 3 PSUs, but there's also a fourth one in the chassis that serves as the +1
well, i guess not less than 350W (too early for me to be reading) but /close to/ 350W :) mnathani: Anyone know of a website that specializes in the storage, collection, archiving, search and retreival of scanned images and documents?
tagging functionality as well as folders / labels would also be handy ***: milki_ is now known as milki
ben2 has joined #arpnetworks
mercutio has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
treshoem2 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
treshoem2 has joined #arpnetworks up_the_irons: m0unds: wow that's pretty cool of the MX80 -: up_the_irons looks for one on ebay m0unds: spec-wise, they're pretty impressive too
i'd like to mess with more j gear, but every site i've worked with is 100% cisco
haha, only $40k for an MX480
"only"
jeez, for $40k, you can also get an EX8216 (16-slot EX8200 switch chassis) w/redundant PSUs, 3x 10GbE SFP+ line cards, 2x 48-port SFP line card and 2x 48 Port 10/100/1000 line cards up_the_irons: yeah the pricing is always crazy, which is why i never have the opportunity to get a juniper m0unds: just need to find a tipped over delivery truck full of j stuff hazardous: wont be hard
it's not like many people will be grabbing at stuff compared to an overturned alcohol truck or something
you could probably take the whole truck m0unds: hahaha
and a couple guys to help you move stuff - those switch chassis' are heavy heavy heavy up_the_irons: LOL
i actually found a 6506 chassis in a dumpster once. i grabbed it. ;) Never had the courage to use it cuz wtf, it could be garbage for real. had a big dent too, but could probably be hammered out. m0unds: hah ***: brycec is now known as ne
ne is now known as brycec
grepidemic has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) hazardous: do.. you still have it? ***: ben2 is now known as mercutio mercutio: m0unds: the J stuff isn't good for the modern internet m0unds: mercutio: and i know tons of folks who work on huge modern networks who would disagree mercutio: even MX120 sucks with full convergence m0unds: max120 is tiny
mx120 mercutio: juniper don't have SMP support yet
adn use small cpus
cisco use small cpus too, but have more efficient bgp implementation m0unds: they use appropriately specced cpus in their routing engines and other stuff
ask the folks who bought into nexus and ios xr how much fun that's been for them, haha mercutio: well route tables are going to get bigger, and if you want to do things like rpki it uses more cpu
i dunno i use bsd :) m0unds: and how cisco's own engineering folks realized they screwed up and had to reengineer an old product (6500) and release that because their flagship line is pretty terrible
i don't think one datapoint makes something better or worse than something else mercutio: well bgp convergence times are too long on the current internet
and with things like ddos attacks taking out transit links at times, or people just screwing up fibre connects, bgp convergence time is noticable. m0unds: also, junos has supported SMP since 8.5, if their release notes are trustworthy mercutio: curious
mx120 has two cpus only one used from what i read m0unds: SMP support in the kernel was added in 8.5 via an upgrade to the kernel and control plane (freebsd) mercutio: maybe i thinking of mx80
i look eat list and i can't see 120 m0unds: last time i see anyone mentioning of it not supporting SMP was in 2011 mercutio: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/M4zXgZAHIfCG3dgyuFF1 m0unds: i'd check if i had an MX80 in front of me mercutio: yeh i think it's mx80 i was thinking of ***: grepidemic has joined #arpnetworks mercutio: which still arne't cheap m0unds: the bgp convergence issue was due to rpd, and according to jtac that was fixed in 11.4R7-S1 mercutio: when was that? m0unds: some weird blocking condition
looking mercutio: i think it's 2 or 3 minutes when not foobared
and 15minutes plus when foobared
but it means people are hesitant to use full route tables on them m0unds: haha, they still haven't fixed my juniper acct
march of 2013 mercutio: they also don't have reundant re m0unds: larger chassis' do mercutio: yeh m0unds: can accommodate it anyway mercutio: then you have to pay for line cards m0unds: yep mercutio: and the cheap line cards don't do aqm
and the aqm line cards cost more
but i suppose networks is something poeople will invest in m0unds: yea, biggest capex here is networking equipment mercutio: i do think they're overpriced in general
and maybe this sdn stuff will improve matters m0unds: i think a lot of the dedicated networking gear is way expensive
in some cases i think it's justified, and in others i think it's absurd mercutio: cos it'd be nicer to have a pc or such control the routing
and just tell the switch where to send stuff
i want to see more interconnects everywhere myself
like between providers local peering etc
which means terminating connections for local users close too
which means needing a router or something close too, whiich means people are likely to use smaller routers ***: mus1cb0x has joined #arpnetworks mus1cb0x: http://support.arpnetworks.com/kb/main/is-there-a-firewall-filter-rate-limit-or-similar-device-applied-to-my-traffic is great
"SSH rate-limit inbound on port 22 (VPS only)"
now i don't need to run fail2ban on my vps's
awesome that it's documented too mhoran: Yep. mus1cb0x: is it still good practice to run pf for basics such as filtering all port 22 access that doesn't come from my isp? ***: goodwill has joined #arpnetworks goodwill: stupid question: is using something like this to cool the a server room/closet considered to be a sane way to do things: http://www.tripplite.com/sku/SRCOOL12K/
or this: http://www.schneider-electric.com/solutions/ww/en/med/4664183/application/pdf/487-srio-7h8gkg_r0_en_src.pdf m0unds: goodwill: we use similar units as backup cooling (in the event that our chiller plant has issues) jpalmer: goodwill: same as m0unds we have 3 of them. but they are for emergency/backup only. if you don't setup a permanent drain line, there is a "bucket" that catches the water. If yuo don't drain it often enough, it has a switch that kills the unit so you don't flood the server room. In florida, that bucket fills in under 8 hours. m0unds: luckily, i'm in the desert and there's little to no condensate to drain, hahaha ***: SpeedBus has quit IRC (Quit: SpeedBus@CrownCloud.net)
SpeedBus has joined #arpnetworks
mus1cb0x has left "WeeChat 0.4.2" up_the_irons: m0unds: jpalmer : a lot of those units don't have the drain buckets anymore, they just evaporate it somehow m0unds: huh.
we've got a big-ass backup AC for our server room - it has a garden hose-sized drain on it. i think it's like a 3 ton unit or something ridiculous like that. takes two people to move it, despite it being on wheels. ***: hazardous has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
hazardous has joined #arpnetworks