brycec: reads are faster in raid5, but writes are (typically) faster to non-raid5. Or that's the "common knowledge" anyways.
No doubt there are scenarios (like linear/serial data) where single disk reads could be faster mercutio: brycec: writes are faster in raid 5 too
it's random acceess that can be faster in raid 10
mnathani: mdadm raid10 far 2 or raidz
is good performance with 3 disks
but generally speaking, you're not going to get much faster performance except for linear read/writes
as often you're bound by serialisation, and access time delays.
i suppose that's quite a general answer, if you have lots of simultaneous access then raid10 near, of offset is faster it hink ***: hazardous has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
hazardous has joined #arpnetworks
toddf has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
toddf has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o toddf
novae has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
novae has joined #arpnetworks
alienresidents has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
novae has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
novae has joined #arpnetworks
thestereobus has joined #arpnetworks
thestereobus has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
jcv has quit IRC (Quit: leaving)
jcv has joined #arpnetworks
exm has joined #arpnetworks
exm has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
exm has joined #arpnetworks
exm has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
jcv has quit IRC (Quit: leaving)
jcv has joined #arpnetworks
exm has joined #arpnetworks
thestereobus has joined #arpnetworks
exm has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
exm has joined #arpnetworks
thestereobus has quit IRC (Quit: thestereobus)
Yamazaki-kun has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
Yamazaki-kun has joined #arpnetworks
novae has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
novae has joined #arpnetworks
exm has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)