GluffiS: :D ***: nixbag has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
nixbag has joined #arpnetworks
nixbag is now known as Guest48486
Ehtyar has quit IRC (Quit: IRC is just multiplayer notepad)
Guest48486 has quit IRC (Quit: leaving)
nixbag has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai_ has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
ixokai_ has joined #arpnetworks
HighJinx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks
HighJinx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks
first2know has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
first2know has joined #arpnetworks
vin has joined #arpnetworks
vin has quit IRC (Client Quit)
robonerd has quit IRC (Quit: zzz)
cam13 has joined #arpnetworks cam13: hello
anyone knows whether i can resize my root softraidC parition (under obsd)? following the method http://scie.nti.st/2013/3/4/how-to-resize-an-openbsd-root-partition/ doesnt seem to work as I need to resize both wd0 but also but also the softraid0 disk mounted when performing bioctl. growfs gently tells me it only supports ffs :X I guess I am pretty stuck or is there any tips? ***: ixokai_ has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) toddf: growing softraid is not currently supported ***: ixokai_ has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai_ has quit IRC (Changing host)
ixokai_ has joined #arpnetworks toddf: if you're wanting it to be supported learn to code c ;-) maybe also hope a developer gets to it before you learn c .. ;-) cam13: ahah i learnt C a while back.. :D but i dont think i would be able to devlop that
hmm in your statement, do you mean that even a non-crypto softraid volume cant be grown? toddf: correct
softraid metadata is highly dependent on the size of the chunks when created cam13: i see GluffiS: maybe you should convert to zfs ;) cam13: understood.. now just not sure how to solve my problem besides destroying the fs and newfs-ing it..
ahha i did think of it. according to the faq, obsd do not support zfs.. didnt look if there are any patch/commit though GluffiS: nope... openbsd does not support zfs ***: ixokai__ has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai__ has quit IRC (Changing host)
ixokai__ has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai_ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) toddf: with fuse .. zfs-fuse might be an option if someone wished to port it milki: switch to fbsd! cam13: lol
i tried fbsd a few times, but it seems to fail me always toddf: then I can learn new ways to bash my head against the wall ;-)
seriously, its a rare thing these days, but I specalize in openbsd because I can focus and undertand everything there; if I start branching out I always end up being frustrated and wanting to port over openbsd's ports tree or whatever because it just works staticsafe: heh cam13: ports and packages are really poorly handled imho ..
in fbsd*
i never had any issue w pkg and/or ports in obsd.. building world etc. it just runs smooth GluffiS: zfs-fuse in openbsd would probably be horrible slow toddf: probably why exactly?
linux ha slinuxs linux uses zfs-fuse yes? GluffiS: just a feeling :D i think fuse is not where highspeed filesystems should reside
openbsd is not built for speed toddf: on the contrary, filesystems that allocate tons of memory belong in userland given that OpenBSD's kernel memory space is constrained
bottom line is, I'd expect the filesystem to not be a bottleneck but rather the disk io speeds instead
if the filesystem is slower due to running in userland vs kernel, the algorithm must be horribly inefficient
(or horribly cpu intensive by design) GluffiS: well, I'll stick to my point of view until disproofed :)
now its bbq time cam13: bbq time.. damn lucky. where're u based? GluffiS: sweden cam13: haha makes sense.. time for dinner there :P
well enjoy ;) toddf: I just have a hard time buying an argument about speed when no real constructive reasons are given ;-)
now if there were actual testing done, hey all the better brycec: FUSE file systems are typically slower than the refined and closely-tied-to-the-kernel file system implementations. Ergo it's reasonable to assume that zfs-fuse would perform slower than its native counterpart. Here's some research: http://www.csl.sri.com/users/gehani/papers/SAC-2010.FUSE.pdf
:P
(it's actually an interesting paper now that I'm reading it) ***: toddf has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
toddf has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o toddf
robonerd has joined #arpnetworks
robonerd has quit IRC (Quit: zzz)
ixokai_ has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai_ has quit IRC (Changing host)
ixokai_ has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai__ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
lteo has quit IRC (Changing host)
lteo has joined #arpnetworks
nesta- has joined #arpnetworks
staticsafe-znc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
nesta has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
nesta- is now known as nesta
ixokai__ has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai_ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
NiTeMaRe has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
ixokai__ has quit IRC (Changing host)
ixokai__ has joined #arpnetworks
staticsafe-znc has joined #arpnetworks
NiTeMaRe has joined #arpnetworks pjs: up_the_irons ping ***: ixokai__ has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
ixokai_ has joined #arpnetworks
doomviki1g is now known as doomviking
Ehtyar has joined #arpnetworks
ixokai_ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
emu has joined #arpnetworks emu: Hi, who can i talk to about billing? you guys suspended my vps about 4 months ago for recieving a ddos attack, you wanted me to promise it would not happen again which of course i cant. i cancled the vps and moved hosts. two days ago you charged a rolled back CC of 100.00. ive gave support/billing a reasonable amount of time to respond. atleast 24 hours/
rolled back meaning you guys removed the default card ending in 8888 and used an alternative card ending in 2906 jpalmer: emu: support turnaround is usually within 24 hours, but occasionally 48. emu: ok thanks will wait ***: emu has quit IRC (Quit: leaving) mercutio: jpalmer: it's usually quicker than that isn't it?
i suppose billing matters can be more complex CaZe: Also a lesser priority than downtime. brycec: Yeah, a bit of a sensitive/touchy subject... For all I know, maybe garry's busy trying to figure out what happened and it's taking some time. ***: staticsafe-znc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
Ehtyar has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
mike-burns has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
up_the_irons has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
staticsafe-znc has joined #arpnetworks
Ehtyar has joined #arpnetworks
up_the_irons has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o up_the_irons
mike-burns has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o mike-burns
mnathani has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
mnathani has joined #arpnetworks