jlgaddis: yes, PowerDNS.  Working good :)
jlgaddis: the choice of PowerDNS was to be able to programmatically update records / zones / anything.  It fits this purpose.  I haven't tested performance, but it is not causing any headaches at the moment.  It is also stable, don't think it has ever crashed.
+1 for powerdns... though nsd is also pretty nice
yeah i like nsd too
keep meaning to play with the dnssec stuff in powerdns - looks really simple compared to everything else
up_the_irons: Yeah, pretty much the same reason i'm looking at it.  If I asked any of my co-workers to add/update/delete an RR right now (using BIND), they'd be lost.
yep
up_the_irons: At least w/ PowerDNS, I could set up one of the existing web front-ends to it or just create my own.
right
I *could* hack up a web front-end to do the same, then send dynamic DNS updates directly to BIND but, meh, that sounds dirty.
hello, could someone give me a hand with IPv6 on OpenBSD 5.2?
this is what I have: https://gist.github.com/4656583
DNS is sorted out, but I can't seem to get nginx & nsd to answer via V6
I am able to ping IPv6 addresses from the VPS
hut.ramov.com is the hostname for both the primary nsd master and nginx is listening there too
        listen   80 default; ## listen for ipv4
        listen   [::]:80 default ipv6only=on; ## listen for ipv6
that's pretty much all of ipv6 config for nginx
have you seen the gist I've posted?
ha   http://samsclass.info/ipv6/exhaustion.htm
lmao
I'm 99.999999% sure the sun will cease to exist by that point
heck, maybe even the entire universe will have cooled
granted, the ipv6 space is also super sparse
so i doubt that estimate is anywhere near correct
nah, its gonna flatline when we switch off of ip
Webhostbudd: theres a link on the calculation
again
that's only if we can saturate ipv6
holy cow that auto-refresh is super-annoying
what auto refresh?
on that samsclass.info page
13:39:09 < mikeputnam> ha   http://samsclass.info/ipv6/exhaustion.htm
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1">
*stab*
jlgaddis: i actually have bind as a front for PowerDNS.  I didn't like the idea of my authoritative DNS being dependent on MySQL, but at this point that is probably just empty paranoia
Like, PowerDNS (acting as a hidden master) w/ BIND slaves?
I kinda like that idea, actually.
jlgaddis: yeah exactly
jlgaddis: at some point i plan to replace bind with nsd.  should be seemless.
Gotcha. I may have to consider that idea, thanks.
jlgaddis: np