#arpnetworks 2012-12-31,Mon

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
***Webhostbudd has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [00:08]
........ (idle for 36mn)
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks [00:44]
............................................................................................. (idle for 7h41mn)
dj_goku has joined #arpnetworks
dj_goku has quit IRC (Changing host)
dj_goku has joined #arpnetworks
[08:25]
dj_goku has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [08:39]
................................... (idle for 2h54mn)
mhoran has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 0.3.9) [11:33]
...... (idle for 28mn)
Webhostbudd has joined #arpnetworks [12:01]
mhoran has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o mhoran
[12:09]
up_the_ironswhoa, lots of scrollback [12:10]
...................................... (idle for 3h6mn)
***Mexicainvexed has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [15:16]
dzup has joined #arpnetworks [15:21]
rith has quit IRC (Quit: EOF) [15:28]
...... (idle for 25mn)
brycecYou're welcome! (not that I had anything to do with it..) [15:53]
RandalSchwartzRandalSchwartz mutters "happy new year" [15:53]
brycecbrycec yawns at 5pm [15:54]
RandalSchwartzyeah - only 4pm here
but it's over the top for some folks
[15:54]
***Mexicainvexed has joined #arpnetworks [16:03]
mercutioit's been the new year for ages
over 13 hours :/
[16:03]
staticsafeUTC is the only relevant time zone :P [16:03]
***dzup has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [16:03]
mercutioyou mean gmt? [16:03]
staticsafeUTC [16:03]
mercutioisn't utc just a reference for other time zones
UTC was used beginning in the mid-twentieth century but became the official standard of world time on January 1, 1972.
oh i didn't know it being an official standard
[16:04]
staticsaferoot@hellhound ~ # date -u
Tue Jan 1 00:04:55 UTC 2013
:)
[16:05]
mercutio# date -u
Tue Jan 1 00:06:02 UTC 2013
your click is behind
oh actually... i think they're about the same
i think my irc client is ahead
[16:06]
staticsafeall my servers are synced via NTP [16:06]
mercutiomost of mine arc
it seems the box i irc on isn't though
[16:07]
RandalSchwartzTue Jan 1 00:07:35 UTC 2013 [16:07]
mercutiomy irc client +37 seconds to you [16:07]
phluxTue Jan 1 00:07:43 UTC 2013 [16:07]
RandalSchwartzrunning ntp, so that should be close [16:07]
phluxsame [16:08]
mercutio2 seconds diff between you two
from my perspective
[16:08]
RandalSchwartzcan't seem to run ntp on any box that has to be PCI compliant though [16:08]
mercutiothere of course can be latency between irc servers/connections [16:08]
RandalSchwartzso instead I run ntpdate once a day.
dumb solution
[16:08]
staticsafemercutio: yes indeed
RandalSchwartz: wtf
[16:08]
RandalSchwartzyeah - they keep flagging ntpd on freebsd as "bad"
so the only solution is to not run it
[16:09]
mercutioopenntpd?
or that huge bloated one?
[16:09]
RandalSchwartzthey just flat the open tcp port
flag
[16:09]
mercutiooh [16:09]
RandalSchwartzso i've had to turn that off
idiots
[16:09]
mercutiodoes ntp use tcp? [16:09]
RandalSchwartzUDP [16:09]
mercutiooh i thought it may have a fallback like dns [16:10]
RandalSchwartzbut they apparently tweak it, and it comes back, so they say "you're bad"
idiots
PCI compliance is a joke
[16:10]
mercutiowelcome to politics :) [16:10]
RandalSchwartzbut my $client has to pass, or not take credit cards from $bank [16:10]
mercutioheh [16:10]
RandalSchwartzsome of the stuff makes sense
but there's a huge pile of WTFery mixed in
[16:11]
mercutiodoes anyone use the calculator key on keyboards? [16:12]
RandalSchwartzI mean, yeah, not storing CVVs or unencrypted PANs, all good.
what's "The calculator key"
[16:12]
mercutiothe picture of a calculator [16:12]
RandalSchwartzRandalSchwartz looks at his keyboard
I have none of those
[16:12]
mercutioit's on most modern keyboards [16:13]
RandalSchwartzI have a very modern keyboard
macbook pro 17-inch
[16:13]
mercutiomiune is where print screen would usually be :( [16:13]
RandalSchwartzlate 2011 or so [16:13]
mercutiooh, laptops don't count [16:13]
RandalSchwartzsure they o [16:13]
mercutiothey don't even have a number pad! [16:14]
RandalSchwartzsure they do
it's just buried in the middle of the KB
[16:14]
mercutiomy media controls are like that [16:15]
RandalSchwartz.. https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3332788?start=0&tstart=0 [16:15]
staticsafeO_o [16:17]
RandalSchwartzRandalSchwartz wanders off to drive home [16:17]
........... (idle for 52mn)
***Mexicainvexed has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [17:09]
................................. (idle for 2h41mn)
mike-burnsThere are keyboards attached to computers that aren't laptops? [19:50]
mercutiowhat?
you mean all in one?
like mac ?
imac
and amiga
[19:51]
mike-burnsHah, I dunno. I've only used laptops and servers for the past five or 10 years. [19:52]
mercutiois macbook pro the g5 one?
really?
[19:52]
RandalSchwartzg5? [19:52]
mercutioi have a laptop, i use it a few times a year
g5 cpu
[19:52]
RandalSchwartzmy macbook pro is an i7 [19:52]
mercutiooh that's powerbook [19:52]
RandalSchwartz... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Pro [19:53]
mercutiooh they never actually did it
i7s in laptops are usually i5s
renamed as i7s
[19:53]
RandalSchwartzno [19:53]
mercutioand i5s i3s [19:53]
RandalSchwartzreal i7
the previous one I had was an i5
and I feel the difference
[19:53]
mercutioIntel Core i7-2620M @ 2.70GHz Average CPU Mark
Description: Socket: BGA1023, Clockspeed: 2.7 GHz, Turbo Speed: 3.4 GHz, No of Cores: 2 (2 logical cores per physical), Max TDP: 35 W
dualcore i7? :)
well that's cos i5 is i3
[19:54]
RandalSchwartzI have 8 threads [19:55]
mercutioreally
wow
[19:55]
RandalSchwartzyes [19:55]
mercutiowhich cpu?
this was early 2011 cpu
[19:55]
RandalSchwartz... 2.4 GHz (2760QM) quad-core Intel Core i7 Sandy Bridge with 6 MB on-chip L3 cache
yes
[19:55]
mercutiooh cool [19:56]
RandalSchwartz"MacBookPro8,3" [19:56]
mercutioyeh it sucks how intel do that
oh
i7 normally has 8mb cache or more i think
[19:56]
RandalSchwartzactually - it says I have 2.5 ghz
so it's even better than that
[19:57]
mercutiooh heh
http://ark.intel.com/products/65719/
[19:57]
RandalSchwartzand yes 8 MB L3 [19:57]
mercutiodesktop i7 is 3.5 ghz and 8mb cache
oh you have 8mb cache cool
[19:57]
RandalSchwartzthis is according to system update [19:58]
mercutiodo you have hd4000 video?
my laptop is damn slow
[19:58]
RandalSchwartzAMD Radeon HD 6770M
and Intel HD Graphics 3000
[19:58]
mercutiocore2duo 2.4 ghz or something
with 4gb ram
and 8gb ram?
and the retina screen thingy?
[19:59]
RandalSchwartzno - looks like 1024MB for the first, and 512 for the second [19:59]
mercutiooh [19:59]
RandalSchwartzno retina screen
this wasn't from 2012 :)
[20:00]
mercutioi7 with 1.5gb ram?
ahh
so it's 1680x1050?
[20:00]
RandalSchwartzjust 1920x1200 [20:00]
mercutiooh cool
that's better than my laptop
i only have 1680x1050 :(
i like how apple are pushign resolutions up
[20:00]
***Lefty has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [20:01]
mercutioat least it has dedicated video card :)
the new macs look ok
err mac laptops
oh
but they only take 8gb ram :(
Optional 16 GB RAM configuration available at time of purchase only
oh
they do take more
[20:01]
RandalSchwartzyeah I have mine baxed out [20:03]
mercutioyou jhust have to order it at time [20:03]
RandalSchwartzmaxxed out
at 8
[20:03]
mercutio16gb is standard for reasonably heavy users now
if buying new
[20:03]
RandalSchwartzI've never gotten up to all of that. [20:03]
mercutiobut laptops often only have two slots [20:03]
RandalSchwartzI guess if you're running vm's or something [20:03]
mercutioyeh that's cos you're using a laptop
8gb sticks are cheap for desktops now
you can have 32gig for prob USD $200?
[20:03]
***Lefty has joined #arpnetworks [20:03]
mercutioit makes a big diff to everything really. well, 16gb does compared to 6gb
that's why i upgraded from ddr2 to ddr3
but that means you have to replace cpu... motherboard.. etc to
too
i wonder how much these mac laptops cost
$3500
ouch
[20:04]
RandalSchwartzvery price appropriate, given hardware features
no more "mac penalty"
[20:05]
mercutiodesktops are a lot cheaper :) [20:06]
RandalSchwartzsure, and have fewer things [20:06]
mercutiomore things you mean? [20:06]
mike-burnsDifferent purposes. [20:06]
mercutiomore expandability bigger monitors, bigger ssds etc [20:06]
RandalSchwartzbut if you price it out, feature for feature, mac hardware is very competitive [20:06]
mercutiomike: depends if being used as a desktop too
yeh you can't get good screens on normal laptops
at least i haven't seen one recently
[20:06]
RandalSchwartzthe trouble is that people tend to compare cheap crappy desktops against macs [20:07]
mercutiomacbook air is not too expensive [20:07]
RandalSchwartzand yeah, so cheap crappy desktops are cheaper. duh. [20:07]
mercutiocheap crappy?
i wonder how much my desktop is worth
it'd probably be $2000 or something
to replace every bit
probably slightly more than that
oh wow
it's easy to forget how much computers cost when you add things over time
like i got a good video card, so i can do high res...
which it does
but good video cards are still expensive
and even then i'm only sitting at 70 fps
[20:07]
mike-burnsIt's still slightly surprising to me how many different things people use computers for. [20:09]
RandalSchwartzI use mine to heat my room [20:09]
mercutiofacebook?
google
[20:09]
mike-burnsLike, how I'd never do someting that involves high res. [20:10]
mercutioi realised the toher day, i never use my laptop without the internet
like if i didn't have internet for some reason, i'd think of my laptop as being useless
mike: reading pdfs?
[20:10]
mike-burnsI use my phone for PDFs. [20:10]
mercutiois your phone high res? [20:11]
mike-burnsDoubtful. [20:11]
mercutioi have to scroll like mad on my phone to read pdfs. [20:11]
mike-burnsIt's just more convenient on the metro. [20:11]
mercutiomy tablet is slightly better
metro?
[20:11]
mike-burnsTunnelbana. [20:11]
mercutiotrain? [20:11]
mike-burnsSure. [20:11]
mercutiowhat are trains like for internet these days [20:11]
Leftyyay, 1.5G of RAM makes for a happy VPS [20:12]
mercutioheh my vps went from 256 to 768mb
but i'd prob be fine with 256 still
[20:12]
LeftyI went from 768 to 1.5
but I'm running a redis server, a mysql server, and a bunch of tmux
[20:12]
mike-burnsThe subway offers no wifi here. The only other train I take is the airport shuttle, and that does offer free wifi. [20:12]
mercutiowhereas my desktop swapped heavily on 6gb [20:12]
Leftyall of those like moar RAM [20:13]
mercutiothat said, i don't use chrome on my vps
lefty: tmux isn't memory hungry
[20:13]
Leftyheh, I get cranky if my desktop has any less than 16 these days [20:13]
mercutiobut yeah the other two could be [20:13]
mike-burnsWeb browsers take crazy amounts of RAM. I blame animated GIFs. [20:13]
Leftytmux consistently is the highest ram consumer on my box [20:13]
mercutioi'm actually only using 8.4 gig on my desktop atm [20:14]
mike-burnsIs the tmux RAM measurement being reported properly? That is, is it instead reporting all the RAM of its child processes? [20:14]
mercutioone chrome window on it's own is using 450mb [20:14]
Leftymike-burns: entirely possible [20:14]
mercutiomike: it doens't report child processes normally?
at least not under openbsd or linux
[20:14]
LeftyI didn't look into it that deeply, but the box was usually a few hundred megs into swap most of the time [20:15]
mercutio14600 root 2 0 668K 1332K sleep kqread 0:00 0.00% tmux
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND
that doesn't seem memory hungry to me
13146 _mysql 2 0 40M 15M idle select 0:30 0.00% mysqld
mysql takes up a bit more
[20:15]
Leftybefore I rebooted, it was reporting ~300M [20:15]
mercutiothat's light mysql usage though
wow
it's probably leaking then
[20:16]
RandalSchwartzmysql? friends don't let friends use mysql. [20:16]
mercutioactually i'm using tmux on my irc [20:16]
Leftytimes four or so users [20:16]
mercutioand it's been running ages
ben 16396 0.1 0.3 4572 2440 ? Ss 2012 7:58 tmux -2
that's linux instead that time
[20:16]
RandalSchwartzapparently, I'm not your friend yet. :) [20:16]
mercutio2.4 mb resident? [20:16]
mike-burnsI'm extremely pleased with the trend of ditching MySQL for Postgres. [20:17]
mercutioi wonder how long it's been running [20:17]
RandalSchwartzif you insist on mysql compatible, use mariadb
but otherwise, postgresql, yes
in either case, please move away from the oracle frankenserver
[20:17]
mercutioi was thinking the other day, mysql is terribly slow
surely their query optimisation could be a lot faster on modern computers?
err could lead to much faster performance
like current performance compared to ideal performance
[20:17]
Leftymysql sucks on modern hardware [20:18]
mercutioi imagine there's lots of complications of such
but like say you have 16gb ram
[20:18]
Leftywell, it sucked on old hardware too, it's just now modern hardware tends to have lots of cores and RAM [20:18]
mercutioand 2gb database [20:18]
RandalSchwartzmariadb is drop-in-completely-replacement for mysql
monty promises such
[20:18]
mercutioit doesn't really matter if you use 8gb of ram
and do things to reduce cpu bottlenecking etc
[20:19]
RandalSchwartzand it's better/stronger/faster
so absolutely no reason to run mysql. evar.
[20:19]
mercutiorandal: mysql comes bundled with operating systems though? [20:19]
RandalSchwartzapt-get is hard to type? [20:20]
mike-burnsWhich OS bundles mysql? [20:20]
mercutiodoes ubntu have maria now?
mike: ubuntu?
[20:20]
mike-burnsOdd. [20:20]
RandalSchwartz... https://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/repositories/ [20:20]
mercutioubuntu, centos, openbsd, etc all have mysql support easily [20:20]
RandalSchwartzserious, google
please don't make me google for you
[20:20]
mike-burnsIs it useful for browsing the Web and, I dunno, whatever else Ubuntu users do? [20:21]
mercutioit doesn't have my ubuntu version [20:21]
RandalSchwartzwhich version of ubuntu?
hardy to precise
[20:21]
mercutioyeah i use quantal [20:21]
RandalSchwartzyeah, be weird. get source then [20:22]
Leftyno mariadb in my repos for 12.04 on arm [20:22]
mercutiolefty: you have to get it from external repository [20:22]
Leftynor x86 [20:22]
mercutiobut that's why people use mysql [20:22]
Leftywell, I still have to get mysql from an external repo [20:22]
mercutiowhen it doesn't matter it's easier to use mysql [20:22]
Leftyat least on our centos boxes [20:22]
mercutiowhen it does matter then people are like "why should you use mariadb"
there was mariadb and another one that i was thinking about migrating to
[20:23]
mike-burnsPostgres. [20:23]
mercutionah [20:23]
Leftymy mysql usage at home is just a toy database [20:23]
mercutioi've used postgresql in the past [20:23]
Leftyat work, though, that's a different story... we do some heavy mysql scariness [20:23]
mercutiobut lots of people are more familiar with mysql [20:24]
Leftyslaves of slaves of slaves [20:24]
mercutiolefty: with redis? [20:24]
Leftyin fact, the only alerts I've got for this on-call was mysql replication breaking [20:24]
RandalSchwartzcouchbase 2.0 looks pretty damn cool [20:24]
Leftymercutio: we use a lot of redis, too, and a lot of mongo [20:24]
mercutiowhy does mysql insisit on using disk for queries anyway [20:24]
RandalSchwartzmaterialized views [20:24]
mercutiohmm wonder what one i looked at
percona
[20:24]
RandalSchwartzI may be deploying it for $client [20:25]
mercutioi thik that was it
looking at wikipedia
so is mariadb a lot faster than mysql in common usage patterns?
[20:25]
RandalSchwartzmonty claims so [20:27]
mercutiobut like 50% faster? [20:27]
RandalSchwartzI. Don't. Know. [20:27]
mercutioahh [20:27]
looks like most of the improvments only happen with 16+ cpu cores
and still 20% from worst to best
[20:34]
Leftyheh, that'd help our workload
the biggest problem with mysql replication is that slaves are entirely singlethreaded
so we can have giant boxes with lots of cores etc, and they don't get used at all
and replication still lags
I can't imagine maria is any better in that respect, so we'll probably stick with mysql
[20:37]
mercutioyeh i'm sure it'd help heavy heavy workloads [20:39]
Leftywe have mysql boxes that are 16core [20:39]
mercutiohmm, i didn't find anything about replication
can you do replication int he app?
the
[20:39]
Leftyyes, but nobody wants to touch it
it's very, very legacy
[20:39]
mercutioi was mostly wanting stupid web applications to go faster :/ [20:40]
Leftyit's slowly being replaced by modern systems that use better storage technologies
though by "better" I'm using it in the loosest sense of the word
[20:40]
mercutioyeh [20:40]
Leftymongodb didn't get production-ready until 2.2
anything before that was fucked hard
[20:40]
mercutiofwiw in these benchmarks percona seems better than mariadb
at 2, 8, 16 cores
weirdly the difference is less at 32 cores
then percona is way way faster at 64 core
4200 versus 2600 tps
[20:41]
Leftyneat
Lefty found out the other day that redis can't handle more than 32G of RAM allocated to it
[20:42]
mercutioheh
you must have a lot of data
[20:42]
Leftywe generate a lot of billing data [20:42]
mercutioa while back i read about memcached not scaling [20:43]
Leftyand the funny thing is that the billing group always says "oh, we'll only need a couple of gig of RAM", then they fire of a few million subscriptions and wonder why redis fell over
off, too
[20:43]
mercutiodue to memory being way worse with random reads than linear
i think you're meant to use low latency memory if you want random queries
[20:43]
Leftyanything, really
I mean, I can't think of many workloads that consist of sequentially reading large amounts of data into RAM, then reading it right back out again
[20:44]
RandalSchwartzyou don't know my clients. :) [20:44]
mercutiooh i think it was the facebook discussion [20:44]
LeftyI can see reading a lot of data, then accessing it randomly [20:45]
mercutiolefty: blogs? [20:45]
LeftyLefty shrugs [20:45]
mercutioi also read at one point that l3 cache isn't a lot faster than memory
but has lower latency..
i assume cos cache is sram
it's like when memory went to sdram the peformance improvement wasn't that great
because the cpus couldn't make that good use for the burst memory speed
although that changed over time
curiously i was reading just now that facebook got better performance from shifting from tcp/ip to udp/ip.
i wonder how much better performance could be with infiniband
[20:45]
......... (idle for 42mn)
Webhostbuddinfiniband is gimicky from what i heard
although definitely better than gige
[21:30]
...... (idle for 26mn)
mercutiowhat's gimicky about it?
it's significantly lower latency than 10 gigabit ethernet
it's also cheaper
especially if you want to go over 10 gigabit throughput
then it's got things like rdma to reduce overhead
whereas infiniband guarantees in order packet delivery
[21:56]
.................... (idle for 1h39mn)
Webhostbuddwell, i've heard 10gige performs better than 20gig infinibamd
however, i don't know the network layourt
[23:37]
mercutioinfiniband native?
or doing ethernet emulation?
[23:51]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)