pjs: LOL yeah i saw that, tnx! and yeah, sako needs to fix his connection... ;) this is the best nerd toy ever galaxy nexus + grandmax keyboard + vx connectbot full hardware keyboard support + a sane terminal emulator on my phone wow. my server is working again kvr05 must've had some bad mojo sucks to have been down for four hours though up_the_irons can you keep my new VPS off of kvr05 pls :) seems to be a problem area pjs: you'll find that each kvr system is a problem at some point in time or another. usually months between problems on any kvr system, but you're not guaranteed any higher success of failure avoidance by asking for $another kvr system ;-) Didn't kvr5 just get new hardware? i'm imagining that it was a noisy neighbor my system was running but very very slowly effectively down for 3-4 hours indeed, kvr05 had very high load this morning CaZe: no, that was kvr25 pjs: don't worry, kvr05 is full and i haven't put new VMs on that one in a long time holy shit, "AMS-IX and DE-CIX Now Available From CoreSite Data Centers" i can haz more peers? up_the_irons: I hate to think what a trans-atlantic L2 to AMS-IX would cost plett: all these things go over some MPLS tunnel these days and it keeps getting cheaper. I bet they spanned AMS-IX's L2 over to Any2 already ;) up_the_irons: I think the last time I looked into it, it was about £800/month for a 100Mb/s link from London to AMS-IX (including all AMS-IX port costs) Does CoreSite do LINX as well? You could peer with my work there ;) plett: i haven't seen LINX mentioned plett: but that would be cool to peer with your network :) toddf, true, though kvr05 seems to happen fairly frequently. I've only had 1 issue with 1 of my VPS arpnetworks has been amazing for me :) Wish I switched over sooner.. wasted too much money on AWS and RS up_the_irons, did you know that Softlayer Dedicated servers only come with 1 Ipv6 address. They make you pay 5 bucks a month for a Static /64 mnathani: LOL mnathani: that's the most retarded thing i've heard IPv6 /64's are *supposed* to be for single assignments (like 1 customer / VLAN / subnet) shows me they don't understand IPv6 they are using IPv4 practices on IPv6 there's a couple RFCs that explain IPv6 subnet allocation best practices, maybe someone should email that to them that's how I learned; RTFM mnathani: haha. wtf. or... maybe they know, and presume that you don't. kaching! there's an RFC saying for security reasons, you can use like a /127 on a point to point link : RFC 6164 "Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links", http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164 up_the_irons: it's common. An awful lot of hosts do stupid shit with ipv6. mnathani: yeah, there are a few rare exceptions, but not for giving a customer an IP or subnet for their server mercutio: welcome back i forgot i wasn't joined! mercutio: btw, your beta vps is finally gonna be toast (i tried to let you know a few other times, but you weren't here ;) oh it wasn't already? mercutio: nah, hadn't got around to it i know that feeling