↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
Who | What | When |
---|---|---|
*** | HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [00:11] |
..... (idle for 22mn) | ||
Ehtyar has joined #arpnetworks | [00:33] | |
........... (idle for 51mn) | ||
HighJinx has quit IRC (Quit: [Textual IRC Client: http://www.textualapp.com/])
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [01:24] | |
HighJinx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
heavysixer has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | [01:40] | |
heavysixer has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o heavysixer HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [01:47] | |
.......................................................................... (idle for 6h8mn) | ||
cmeiklejohn has joined #arpnetworks | [07:57] | |
cmeiklejohn has quit IRC (Quit: ["Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com"]) | [08:08] | |
....... (idle for 32mn) | ||
vmmello has joined #arpnetworks | [08:40] | |
..... (idle for 21mn) | ||
heavysixer has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [09:01] | |
....... (idle for 30mn) | ||
HighJinx has quit IRC (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.) | [09:31] | |
...... (idle for 26mn) | ||
mikjaer has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) | [09:57] | |
heavysixer has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o heavysixer | [10:08] | |
....... (idle for 33mn) | ||
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [10:41] | |
...... (idle for 27mn) | ||
staticsafe has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 0.3.9) | [11:08] | |
staticsafe has joined #arpnetworks | [11:15] | |
....... (idle for 30mn) | ||
cmeiklejohn has joined #arpnetworks | [11:45] | |
cmeiklejohn has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
cmeiklejohn has joined #arpnetworks | [11:55] | |
cmeiklejohn has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) | [12:04] | |
....... (idle for 30mn) | ||
dzup has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) | [12:34] | |
mnathani has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
m_nathani has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | [12:44] | |
dzup has joined #arpnetworks | [12:52] | |
............ (idle for 57mn) | ||
heavysixer has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
heavysixer has joined #arpnetworks ChanServ sets mode: +o heavysixer | [13:49] | |
.............. (idle for 1h9mn) | ||
cmeik has joined #arpnetworks | [15:00] | |
............. (idle for 1h1mn) | ||
mnathani has joined #arpnetworks | [16:01] | |
...... (idle for 28mn) | ||
cmeik has quit IRC (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.) | [16:29] | |
up_the_irons | anyone using CARP / OpenBSD on their VPS' ?
i know someone has to... got a customer saying they can ping the CARP interface from their VMs, but they can't ping the CARP interface from the outside (perhaps the CARP interface shouldn't even be pingable from the outside?) | [16:34] |
staticsafe | interesting concept
(reading up on CARP) up_the_irons: isn't CARP using local (RFC1918) addresses? (afaict from http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html) | [16:42] |
up_the_irons | nfi | [16:47] |
staticsafe | heh | [16:47] |
plett | I've used CARP before, but not on a VPS. It doesn't have anything to do with RFC1918 addresses | [16:54] |
staticsafe | oic
that page isn't making much sense to me atm heh | [16:54] |
plett | It's the same in concept as VRRP or HSRP. You have a 'floating' IP address which can move between machines on a L2 segment if one goes down | [16:56] |
staticsafe | so IP failover? | [16:57] |
plett | The first paragraph on that page begins "CARP is the Common Address Redundancy Protocol. Its primary purpose is to allow multiple hosts on the same network segment to share an IP address." :) | [16:57] |
staticsafe | plett: you explained it much better :) | [17:00] |
mercutio | up_the_irons: it may be due to mac addresses changing? | [17:07] |
up_the_irons | mercutio: i would imagine so, but when the CARP IP gets assigned a new MAC, I would imagine some sort of gratuitous ARP would be sent so switches update their caches. Otherwise, it would be kinda pointless. | [17:09] |
mercutio | lots of routers can hold onto arp for ages
hence i'm not really a fan of crap on external facing interfaces carp i did mean carp | [17:09] |
staticsafe | nice freudian slip
:P | [17:10] |
mercutio | weird i just had a long pause to my vm and now it seems fine
like it went to sleep oh it seems it emulates other mac addresses it may only be when load balancing | [17:11] |
Lefty | it could be firewall-related... I had a similar problem on a pfsense box the other day, as I'd moved a service from a static to a CARP IP but then forgot to add firewall rules allowing traffic to the CARP address | [17:13] |
mercutio | oh well i have no idea
and i've only got one ipv4 address so don't really ... hmm, i wonder if carp works with ipv6 | [17:15] |
staticsafe | it does say it supports ipv6 | [17:15] |
mercutio | i so need a fan
i'm melting | [17:15] |
staticsafe | http://www.bigassfans.com/ | [17:16] |
...... (idle for 25mn) | ||
*** | vmmello has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [17:41] |
........... (idle for 50mn) | ||
cmeik has joined #arpnetworks | [18:31] | |
mikeputnam | ha
i know a maintenance man at a local hotel. he told me about installing a Big Ass Fan[TM] | [18:38] |
*** | HighJinx has quit IRC (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.) | [18:53] |
....... (idle for 30mn) | ||
gcw|mbpro has joined #arpnetworks | [19:23] | |
.............. (idle for 1h8mn) | ||
cmeik has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | [20:31] | |
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [20:39] | |
toddf | carp works with ipv6 somewhat, I've done it, but have ended up having to ping6 the carp ip from the client before it works at times, supposedly code went in to fix it, I never setup a proper test env to confirm this or not | [20:43] |
mercutio | ahh
i've only got a /64 to my vps atm i think, and it seems carp doesn't like using an overlapping address or i'm doing somethign wrong | [20:50] |
brycec | the "local" interface needs only a private address, something it can talk to the other host using. Then the public address gets floated between them
At least, that's from my experimentation with pfSense. And in that scenario, a dedicated, separate interface was recommended so it would have a completely separate (non-public) IP anyways. The idea of using CARP between VPS', particularly if they're on separate hosts, is intriguing. | [20:53] |
mercutio | yeah it is slightly
even if it's just for things like authorative dns that timeout and can go to diff server but are much faster if server is up and you don't have to worry about state etc | [21:02] |
.... (idle for 17mn) | ||
brycec | That reminds me... one of these days I need to read up on anycast | [21:19] |
mercutio | anycast is pretty simple
basically you advertise the same address in multiple locations via BGP that said, it gets more complicated with traffic management etc like BGP as-path isn't always accurate for closest destination | [21:22] |
brycec | whoa, really? you can advertise the same address in multiple places?
that's wild... | [21:24] |
mercutio | yeh
but you need to advertise at least a /24 well if it's to the internet | [21:24] |
brycec | ha obviously :p | [21:24] |
mercutio | if it's just your local network you can easily add /32 in different locations | [21:24] |
brycec | (obviously if you're familiar with BGP) | [21:24] |
mercutio | yeah
i had no idea how familiar you were there's like 25,000 BGP users in thew orld isn't ther? oh maybe more | [21:24] |
brycec | Yeah, I'm vaguely familiar with
I thought I heard there were 39k or so | [21:25] |
mercutio | ok
25k was a random stab in the dark anyway there are like more than a billion users so a lot of people aren't using bgp | [21:26] |
brycec | Well since you've explained it, it seems very simple afterall | [21:26] |
mercutio | err i mean
don't necessarily need to understand bgp yeah umm generally speaking you have a /24 for external facing then you have another subnet for internal facking facing ie, you need to be able to reach the gear regardless but pretty much if you have more than two locations having a /32 advertised gets helpful real quickly for dns just like lots of people know 8.8.8.8 it's much easier to remember one number for all locations than heaps of differnet ip numbers i reckon there should be a standard anycast recursive dns myself that any provider can implement but yeah, the problem with anycast for wider internet facing stuff, is there's lots of community stuff that needs to be done to improve routing and providers can be hit and miss with how they let you influence routing i kind of wish there was better control for that stuff standardised | [21:26] |
.... (idle for 18mn) | ||
*** | dzup has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | [21:52] |
dzup has joined #arpnetworks | [22:04] | |
....... (idle for 30mn) | ||
jlgaddis | most providers allow you to set communities on your advertisements to control that type of stuff | [22:34] |
mercutio | yeah, bu t it's not standardised | [22:38] |
*** | meingtsil has joined #arpnetworks
meingtsla has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) | [22:43] |
jlgaddis | *nod* | [22:44] |
*** | meingtsil is now known as meingtsla | [22:45] |
↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |