Made some changes today: http://www.phluxbox.com/img/i3_wkspc1_06102012.png and http://www.phluxbox.com/img/i3_wkspc2_06102012.png
up_the_irons: re beta VM: thanks! my home infrastructure is all disassembled to move to new apartment, so I'll start testing on Monday when it's all rebuilt
Hmm, let's some it wasn't some dipshit being ignorant and getting himself (and the rest of ARP) DDoS'd.
seems fine for me
my ping is like 140 which is about normal
10 msec for the adsl 130 from new zealand to los angeles.
I always like to expect the worst.  That way, I'm usually (hopefully) pleasantly surprised.  =)
it may just be your node
Not sure how Garry defines "high network traffic" either.  =)
oh you're talking about the splits
freenode is terribly unstable, it's not arp's fault.
I'm referring to his Twitter status:  "We are investigating high network traffic to host kvr26"
oh
Maybe he blocked it
i'm not on kvr26
i think i'm on kvr15 and kvr27
Since an individual host can do up to 100 Mbps, though, and I assume the physical hosts have 1 GbE links, I figured it must've been a couple hundred Mbps of traffic.
Physical nodes have 100 megabit
I don't remember which ones I'm on, TBH.
Err are in 100 megabit switch atm
That's meant to change sometime soon though
Oh, that's right, a 4507, IIRC.
I think average utilisation is like 10 megabit or something though for a node
Or even less maybe.
I don't tend to find network performance problems common at all
That said I was slightly disconcerted at first - until I realised that there was still gigabit transit links.
Same here.  I occasionally back up everything offsite and have no problems getting almost 100 Mbps out of it.
I wonder what I can get
I just tar everything up and then SFTP it, no problems getting nearly a full 100 Mbps from L.A. to Indianapolis.
i'm installing iperf heh
for some reason it's not isntalling
i think mirrors.arpnetworks.com is down
It's responding to ping.
or just going slow
just slow i think
... and HTTP.  =)
Heh, /pub points back to /
http://mirrors.arpnetworks.com/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/pub/
i notice that too
Who is on the lowest numbered kvr? :)
also the ubuntu/debian etc directories
hmm i asked for that jlg :)
cos otherwise the normal urls for /pub/OpenBSD etc don't work
I think one of mine are on 04 but not certain w/o checking.
Heh, one of our customers asked me to look into an issue on their network... all their routing is asymmetrical.
That's pretty low!
They have two upstreams... all traffic is coming in one and going out the other.
my ipv6 is being weird i think
IPv6 is fine here.
oh it's what i'm connecting to i think
And normal pings.
Definitely not experiencing anything on kvr02.
And 10 seems fine as well.
He mentioned kvr26 but then said ~12 mins ago that it "subsided".
Ah.
Sorry, should've mentioned that
do you have to do something special to make iperf work with ipv6?
ssh is working
... and $customer is sending advertisements of RFC1918 space to one upstream.  *sigh*
:(
Cogent, so they probably aren't even filtering them out, heh.
-V
74.2 megabit from new zealand
70.3 megabit from los angeles
TCP or UDP?
tcp
single connection
Not bad at all.
i'll compare this other los angeles host that's on gigabit
6.51megabit
oh maybe both those tests were los angeles before
i'm getting 5.29 to arp now
yeh it's 70 megabit both times
i'm using ipv6 though
i suppose i could try with ipv4
about the same
nz speeds can kind of suck
but that upload seems slow still
maybe there really is dos activity
it'd prob be incoming
i'm also using emulated netowrk