sheech: I replied to your ticket, with one question...  if you could answer tonight, I'll get the upgrade rolling :)
done
up_the_irons, I answered :)
sheech: roger, thanks
up_the_irons, I answered your pv
should i not be able to ping the ipv6 gateway
i can't seem to get ipv6 working and i don't know why
are you using a /64 of a /48?
a /64
im pretty sure i did it correctly
set inet6 to 2607:f2f8:a478::2
and gateway to 2607:f2f8:a478::1
can't ping the gateway or any other site though
this is from devio.us to your gateway:
$ ping6 2607:f2f8:a478::1
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:4:2a5::2 --> 2607:f2f8:a478::1
16 bytes from 2607:f2f8:a478::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=57 time=74.093 ms
16 bytes from 2607:f2f8:a478::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=57 time=74.527 ms
16 bytes from 2607:f2f8:a478::1, icmp_seq=2 hlim=57 time=74.234 ms
^C
--- 2607:f2f8:a478::1 ping6 statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 74.093/74.285/74.527/0.181 ms
works fine
you did break your side though, cuz i can't ping ::2
i think i figured it out now
i was playing around with a bunch of different stuff
at first i had pf configured correctly but didn't setup the interface correctly
now it was the other way around
got it working now though
it's too bad you have to tell pf both inet and inet6. Otherwise it implicitly assumes inet for the rules and only applies them for ipv4
ah ok
i never realized how much complication ipv6 adds to everything
pf can't do ipv6 and ipv4 rules in the same line, which gets a little irritating
that would kinda make sense; different addressing styles would require separate lines
ipv4 and ipv6 are different address families, as it is, so right there, different lines :)
i can't get ipv4 and ipv6 bgp info from OpenBGP in the same command either, lol
yea, and in linux it is worse
you need two separate utilities
at least pf is consolidated
not that it is very hard to use ip6tables
right
it is actually kind of nice having them separated
i use ferm, which kinda makes the distinction hardly noticeable
i see
you guys use openbsd mostly in house?
obviously kvm is on a linux distro
yeah, kvm is on linux
console server, nagios, and a few other servers are openbs
*openbsd
hmm alright
mail server too
openbsd / spamd make a tight mail server
never used spamd
interesting, ill have to check it out
spamd :(
1) greylisting :(((
2) wtf, they couldn't pick a unique name? :P
That's pretty unique.
yeah. Not like dspam or spamd already existed :P