up_the_irons: not much of a seamless upgrade as it only has room for one more host in the vlan!
Hmph. I upgrade from Debian 5 to Debian 6 and find myself unable to boot the kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 that comes with it, but I can still boot the old kernel 2.6.26-2-amd64 :E  Wonder what changed.
lots
best bet would be a reinstall of debian 6 and start fresh
Well, I have a sysresccd in my CD drive with linux-3.0.8 and linux-3.1.0. Neither of those will boot either. And I don't seem to have a way to scroll up the boot log to see what's causing the kernel to throw up in any of these cases.
im not sure an apt-get upgrade/update from 5 to 6 will go through without error
you might just want to install fresh from 6
That would involve a disk change. I guess I could put in for that, but just trying to find another way to get around this in the meantime
raptelan: i can just expand the IP block though, which is what i've always done so far (never had to renumber a customer).  so they just change their subnet mask.
there is always 61 ppl here
why can't i break 70?? ;)
you could break 70 into 35 + 35 :)
oh no u didn't
big talk on git, 150 people attending
nice!
and murmurs of further consulting
maybe I should specialize in git now
yeah
git is so hot right now.
for all of us in the US: http://americancensorship.org/
if you haven't done so already, make a couple quick calls
up_the_irons, I've been making a few calls a day :)
pjs: nice :)
does anyone have a Cisco ASA that can verify whether it supports SAML 1.1 in it's webvpn ?
if you do
conf t
webvpn
sso-server test-saml type saml-v1.1-post
see if that works
up_the_irons: Scary. :(
mhoran: srsly
And it's so obvious that nobody voting on this bill understands how the Internet works.
yeah absolutely
it's madening
I wonder what would happen if something like this actually went through. Would a new Internet be created? Small, private ISPs or something? Seems possible in big cities via WiMax, but I'm ont sure about across the country. Or around the world.
we gotta get more support for peer-to-peer dns
dns is still a critical spof that governments can tap and "lights out" a site
mhoran: yeah, smaller internets, perhaps
is there a peer-to-peer dns proposal/RFC?
jpalmer: i thought i saw some work on that a while back
Yeah.
perhaps similar to how networks / bgp work...  announcements (domain  names?) propagate to peers.  if you don't have a domain name in your "domain table" (analagous to routing table), the resolution request goes to the default resolver (analagous to default route)
I think the security aspects are what would concern me the most.  but I do know there was a secure DNS movement using the same concepts as bitcoin..
totally thinking out loud...
And the biggest thing that pisses me off here  is that this isn't going to stop any of the offenders -- who will just bypass this whole blocking system. It's going to hurt mom and dad.
true dat
mhoran: exactly.
... who I had to spend two hours teaching how to use Netflix on their TV over the weekend.