↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
Who | What | When |
---|---|---|
*** | ant has joined #arpnetworks | [00:04] |
........................................................................... (idle for 6h12mn) | ||
ziyourenxiang has joined #arpnetworks | [06:16] | |
.... (idle for 15mn) | ||
ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: ziyourenxiang) | [06:31] | |
............. (idle for 1h4mn) | ||
ziyourenxiang has joined #arpnetworks | [07:35] | |
............... (idle for 1h14mn) | ||
ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: ziyourenxiang) | [08:49] | |
................................... (idle for 2h51mn) | ||
Ehtyar has joined #arpnetworks | [11:40] | |
............................... (idle for 2h33mn) | ||
raptelan | up_the_irons: for multiple hosts, I understand, but I mean for single-host clients | [14:13] |
.............. (idle for 1h5mn) | ||
*** | tubgoat has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
tubgoat has joined #arpnetworks | [15:18] |
....... (idle for 31mn) | ||
up_the_irons | raptelan: well, i don't like an upgrade path with a barrier. like, if a single-host client becomes multiple-host, then i would have to redo their whole networking (new IPs, from shared /24 to an individual VLAN /29, etc...)
the way it is now, single-host clients are treated the same as multiple-host, making the upgrade path seemless | [15:50] |
*** | boba has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
boba has joined #arpnetworks | [15:52] |
.................................................................. (idle for 5h26mn) | ||
boba has quit IRC (Quit: boba) | [21:19] | |
.................. (idle for 1h28mn) | ||
boba has joined #arpnetworks | [22:47] | |
boba has quit IRC (Client Quit) | [22:52] | |
ziyourenxiang has joined #arpnetworks | [23:05] | |
..... (idle for 22mn) | ||
ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: ziyourenxiang) | [23:27] |
↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |