#arpnetworks 2011-07-03,Sun

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
***HighJinx has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks
[01:54]
ivan-kan` has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
[02:01]
mig5 has joined #arpnetworks [02:09]
.......... (idle for 49mn)
mig5 has left [02:58]
mercutiodoes arp have a looking glass? [03:05]
...... (idle for 29mn)
dxtrWat? [03:34]
RandalSchwartza mirror? :) [03:34]
.......... (idle for 47mn)
***heidar has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
heidar has joined #arpnetworks
[04:21]
Gdxtr: you know, a queriable BGP server type thing so you can see how the internet appears from the prespective of different places on the internet [04:24]
......... (idle for 40mn)
RandalSchwartzwhy would arp need one? [05:04]
..... (idle for 20mn)
GRandalSchwartz: I guess it's just a 'nice to help' but personally I don't see the point in every provider doing it [05:24]
RandalSchwartzYeah - how many different views do you need? :)
you can also just traceroute yourself. I do that a lot.
[05:36]
plettI'm a new customer, and would have found one useful to see how a VPS at arp would route traffic to various places before I signed up [05:36]
RandalSchwartzsince it varies from day to day, how does that help? [05:36]
GRandalSchwartz: there are useful aspects though, but as I said, I don't see the point in every provider doing it [05:37]
plettBGP shouldn't really be that unstable [05:37]
RandalSchwartzif you make purchase decisions based on a particuler view one afternoon, I think you're missing the picture. :0
plett - arp has a lot of redundant links
so yes - it does vary, with load, with what's up vs down, etc.
[05:37]
GRandalSchwartz: Looking Glasses seem to only be of any use if stuff is broken [05:38]
RandalSchwartzand if stuff is broken, up_the_irons should be fixing it. not waiting for us to diagnose it remotely :) [05:38]
GRandalSchwartz: I'm talking in a general sense [05:38]
RandalSchwartzI generally do too. :) [05:38]
Gand who's to say the brokenness is up_the_irons' fault [05:39]
RandalSchwartzI didn't say that [05:39]
plettRandalSchwartz: Indeed. I have seen the lists of peers on arp's website. It's the details of how it would be routed in the normal situation of all transits and peerings being up that I would have been interested in [05:39]
RandalSchwartzplett - again, depending on load. :)
there is some sort of ASN mapper out there.
[05:39]
Gplett: why not traceroute from the other end? [05:40]
RandalSchwartzok - time to go get on a plane from Porto Alegre to Rio.
RandalSchwartz waves off
[05:40]
plettG: I did. The routing is asymetric in some cases
RandalSchwartz: BGP doesn't include the load on the links when chosing a route for a prefix, unless arp are doing something non-standard
Routes to the UK (which is mostly what I'm interested in) improved quite a lot when arp added PacketExchange/mzima/GTT/whoever_they_are_today transit
A looking glass at ARP's end would let me see where it would go if the PacketExchange path were down, etc
[05:40]
........ (idle for 37mn)
mercutioplett: hah it's mzima routing that's borken for me
well i mean suboptimal
i was wondering how much it's preferred by and what my transit provider is doing
it used to be fine
oh actually it was only mzima foward path to the vps
reverse path is via trit.net
i dunno who trit.net is
mzima seems to be forward path going via paix.
it's easier to change forward-path routing than reverse-path routing though
https://www.trit.net/corp/
wow
web site coming soon
[06:24]
plettmercutio: From here in the UK, it's mzima in both directions and a nice short route. It helps that we peer with PacketExchange/mzima in London, and ARP has transit from them in LAX [06:31]
mercutioplett: what's short?
like what latency?
i have a uk vps
hmm it goes via mzima 150msec
[06:31]
plettI was meaning hop count rather than latency, but I get 160ms from my ADSL at home [06:33]
mercutiothat's not too bad
i suppose
i'm in new zealand
[06:33]
plettIronically, IPv6 is consistently 20ms lower - 140ms rather than 160 [06:33]
mercutiomy latency was around 126 msec not including dsl segment
now it's like 167 not including dsl segment
dsl is around 10 msec
plett: that happens soemtimes
with one provider that i used to use it's 133 msec frmo uk
anyway the difference between 169 msec and 126 msec is actually noticable
[06:33]
plettIPv6 being lower latency is mostly just down to "everyone using HE" [06:35]
mercutiobut i realise that it's probably from my transit provider having fucked routing now
hmm
he.net is good
in osome ways
not very reliable
but some of their routing is pretty good
although on some paths it can vary
like going via denver/chi or phoenix/dallas/atlanta
[06:35]
plettWe only get v6 from them in London as they peer for free [06:36]
mercutioi usd to think he.net was just a budget lame provider
oh yip
i've got he.net tunnel
[06:36]
plettI have no knowledge of what their v4 routes are like [06:36]
mercutioto the uk they're pretty good
hmm 155msec frmo san jose
that's not that good
oh that's right
they're better from la to uk
then san jose
san jose goes via ashville/paris
los angles gos via new york/london
i dropped the la provider that used he.net
due to excessive packet loss though
don't think it was he.net's doing though
3. lonap.he.net 0.0% 8 10.2 2.8 1.3 10.2 3.1
4. 10gigabitethernet4-4.core1.nyc4.he.net 0.0% 8 70.6 72.4 69.3 79.4 3.9
5. 10gigabitethernet8-3.core1.chi1.he.net 0.0% 8 86.7 87.2 86.6 88.9 1.0
6. 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.den1.he.net 0.0% 8 119.6 111.8 110.3 119.6 3.2
7. 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.lax2.he.net 0.0% 8 132.7 134.2 132.5 142.0 3.3
but athat's what their london to los angeles routing is like
who was it before mzima?
[06:37]
plettOriginally it was all PacketExchange, then they created the mzima name for transit [06:42]
mercutionah i meant that arp was using [06:43]
plettOh, It used two or three different transit providers to them from here
I don't know about the other direction, as I didn't have anything at arp at that point
[06:43]
mercutioreally packet loss makes more diff than latency
like 5% packet loss is worse than 40msec more latency
[06:45]
plettLooking at the BGP tables from the London end, every transit feed we have has picked packetexchange as its best route to arp [06:48]
mercutioheh [06:49]
plettAnd for v6, everyone (apart from Level3 of course) uses HE to get to arp [06:49]
mercutiowhat do your transit tables say for best route to 202.49.71.59?
(my IP in new zealand)
it mostly goes via cogent from uk i think to me
[06:49]
plettOnly if the UK isp is using cogent, I would assume
No short route to 202.49.71.59. Best route from my view in the UK is via Level3 - 3356 4648 4610 17746 9559
[06:50]
mercutioi dunno it may be peered
hmm
i'm guessing cogent is one of those asnumbers
oh hey it's not
[06:50]
plettNo, Cogent is 174 [06:51]
mercutiodo you get less than 300 msec ping? [06:51]
plettThat's Level3 -> Netgate -> Odyssey -> Orcon -> Plain Communications [06:52]
mercutioyip [06:52]
plettNone of those names mean anything to me, they all look .nz to me :) [06:52]
mercutioheh [06:52]
plett295ms [06:52]
mercutionetgate is big provider here
odyssey is pretty much transit of orcon
orcon is upstream
plain communications is a small isp i work at
295 msec yeh..
[06:52]
plettI also work for a small ISP, but in the UK :) [06:53]
mercutiothat's where latency gets annoying :)
ahh ok
do you do many diff things ?/
it's weird with big companies how people like really specialise
[06:53]
plettThe usual. DSL, ethernet connections, voip, etc
Most of our income is DSL
[06:54]
mercutionah i meant do you
not the isp
[06:55]
plettAhh, yeah. Anything technical [06:55]
mercutioahh yip :)
that's basically my role heh
[06:55]
plettMost small companies are the same - everyone does everything [06:55]
mercutioshit we don't make shit all off dsl.
none of the providers here make much off dsl
ethernet, voip etc have more profit
[06:55]
plettEthernet has bigger profit margins, but you sell it to far fewer people [06:57]
mercutiotrue
but like dsl
there is so small margins
i dunno, like here, you pay a lot to one company who owns dsl equipment
that connects to the users etc
so
that basically eats into things
and also bandwidth is expensive here
that said all the isp's here have data caps
[06:57]
plettHere it's British Telecom who owns the majority of the copper to peoples houses and DSL DSLAMs etc. We buy end user DSL tails from them [06:59]
mercutioyeh,
so probably similar deal.
i have a friend in the uk
in cambridge
he was using dsl
his dsl was really shit
i think it had interleaving on
but like he got poor sync speeds.
then he moved, and he got slightly better syn cspeeds.
speeds
but it seems like exchanges are often far away there?
like he was at 30 or 40 db attenuation
something really high
but like here they're doing cabinets everywehre to give people faster sync rates
so most people sync at between around 8 to 20 mbit
[07:00]
plettCambridge is a bit of an anomaly. It has lots of high tech business and a university etc, so has lots of high tech fibre connections. But apart from that, it's a small towm with copper that has been there for 60+ years [07:01]
mercutioi sync around 2100/1260
oh
so that's why his dsl sucks?
[07:01]
plettI know other people in cambridge, and they all say the same [07:02]
mercutiohe said that he wouldn't get virgin cable cos they wouldn't stop pestering him when he told them that the person that had cable connected when he moved in has left.
and were impossible to deal with
but i think virgin did 50mbit cable or something
err 2100 i meant 21500
[07:02]
plettThey're rolling out fibre-to-the-cabinet here too. I have it here at home, and get about 20Mb down and 10Mb up [07:03]
mercutiovdsl? [07:03]
plettYeah. VDSL2 [07:03]
mercutiothere's vdsl2 equipment here
like i'll be on a vdsl2 port
but no-one is selling it yet
[07:03]
plettMaximum sync rate is 40M down and 10 up [07:04]
mercutiooh and atm in t he trails you have to have interleaving on
so it's high ping
i used to live in a different city
and had like 20 msec higher ping
but like the diff between 10 and 30 msec ping
is actually quite noticable to me
[07:04]
plettFibre-to-the-premises is on the roadmap here too. That will give 100M downstream [07:04]
mercutioheh
thing is
web browsing doesn't go anywhere near 100 mbit
[07:05]
plettIt's all the streaming video which is the killer [07:05]
mercutionot here :)
yet.
well i suppose there's youtube
but like
that doesn't do anywhere near 100 mbit
[07:05]
plettWe're a UK ISP, and Wimbledon tennis tournament is on this week - lunchtime data usage is sky high on our business customers [07:06]
mercutioheh
is there a cdn for it?
[07:06]
plettThe BBC stream it all live. They use Akamai and Highwinds as the CDN for it [07:07]
mercutiowhich you'll have plenty of capacity to?
hmm, highwinds connectivity to nz isn't great
if its' the one i think it is
[07:07]
plettOh yes. gig-e ports to Akamai. Highwinds refused to peer with us as we're too small [07:08]
mercutiothat's weird?
i thought cdn's would have open peering :)
[07:08]
plettThe capacity problems come on the DSL backhaul links to BT
You'd think so, wouldn't you. Maybe that's why they're losing out to Akamai ;)
[07:08]
mercutiooh right
that's what was happening here
then they fixed it
well kind of
you have to change the way you're doing things
to connect
akamai is really slow i reckon
like with uncached content
well here it is at least
i honestly though they'd use more smarts
[07:09]
plettPeering is very big in the UK. Over half our traffic goes via peering rather than paid transit [07:11]
mercutiowow!
about 10% of traffic is peered here?
i can't find a highwinds test download
[07:12]
plettWe have huge peering LANs that have hundreds of members on them in the UK. I understand it's done differently in other parts of the world, with smaller per-building or per-provider public peering LANs, and lots of direct cables for private peering [07:13]
mercutioanyway
hwcdn.net goes to LA
here like
the biggest providers don't peer
but the smaller ones do
but like
there's no google or anything here
so like there's not a lot of content peering
and like bittorrent etc
goes all over the place
[07:13]
plettWell, the big content providers or end-user eyeball networks peer here. But the big transit providers fairly obviously refuse to. [07:14]
mercutiobut usually not to peers
much
yeh
but like BT wouldn't peer right?
and virginmedia wouldn't?
and you were saying highwinds don't with small providers
[07:14]
plettVirgin don't, no [07:15]
mercutioso it's interesting you can still get 50% peering traffic
i suppose youtube
accounts for a bit?
[07:15]
plettYeah, we peer with google and facebook, which account for lots of traffic [07:15]
mercutiocool
i suppose it is harder here
i've been trying to develop a system to improve performance over high latency connections atm
[07:16]
plettWith .nz being thousands of miles from anywhere else? [07:16]
mercutioerr over the internet i mean
cos like international web browsing sucks from here
i've been like proxying with persistent connections
using geo ip lookups
to send to close proxies
i've kind of figured out that it wroks
works
[07:16]
plettI can't see an easy way to fix that, apart from dragging .nz somewhere else, or laying lots more undersea fibre [07:17]
mercutiobut now i want to try doing tcp acceleration
mm,
well my proxy system does google's initcwnd thing
like with sending more pcakets initially
which helps a lot
[07:17]
plettAhh, window size stuff [07:18]
mercutiobut also like lots of sites don't have window sizes that get big etc
yeah
but even being closer to a destination
if a site has a small amount of packet loss
and you're close
resends have to go less distance
so as long as you don't have packet loss to a site that's near it
if the site near it has a big of packet loss to destination it doesn't hurt nearly as much.
but like, i suppose i'm a bit of a geek, i just want to see how fast i can actually get web browsing to get :)
which means having good peering etc.
but i can't think of any cheap way to do that
in my tests i've noticed that you have to be within about 20 msec from destination to get good speeds.
but like the internet is a huge place.. you can't really be 20 msec from everywhere
like norway is over 20 msec frmo london
but how many web sites other than opera are in norway?
actually looking at a map, i think norway could be 20 msec from london if there was a direct cable
i assume there probably isn't
[07:18]
plettI've got to run
mercutio: Nice talking to you.
[07:35]
............... (idle for 1h14mn)
***dxtr has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [08:49]
dxtr has joined #arpnetworks
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
[08:56]
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
[09:02]
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
[09:22]
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks [09:36]
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
[09:42]
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
[09:48]
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
[10:00]
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
[10:12]
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks
[10:17]
.......... (idle for 47mn)
homosaur has joined #arpnetworks [11:06]
...... (idle for 26mn)
homosaur_ has joined #arpnetworks
homosaur has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
homosaur_ is now known as homosaur
[11:32]
............... (idle for 1h10mn)
ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [12:43]
............................................ (idle for 3h38mn)
EhtyarWRK has joined #arpnetworks [16:21]
...................... (idle for 1h46mn)
jebba has joined #arpnetworks [18:07]
heidar has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
heidar has joined #arpnetworks
[18:21]
........................... (idle for 2h10mn)
homosaur has quit IRC (Quit: pocketful of goat cheese, ready to party) [20:32]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)