| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| *** | bob^^ has quit IRC (Read error: No route to host)
bob^^ has joined #arpnetworks | [00:57] |
| LT has joined #arpnetworks | [01:02] | |
| ....... (idle for 30mn) | ||
| nerdd_ has joined #arpnetworks
nerdd has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) | [01:32] | |
| ........ (idle for 38mn) | ||
| ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks | [02:12] | |
| ...................... (idle for 1h47mn) | ||
| a_j__c has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | [03:59] | |
| a_j__c has joined #arpnetworks
a_j__c has quit IRC (Changing host) a_j__c has joined #arpnetworks | [04:08] | |
| ......... (idle for 40mn) | ||
| ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [04:48] | |
| ............. (idle for 1h1mn) | ||
| chess has quit IRC (Quit: Darkness shrugs and bids the day goodbye) | [05:49] | |
| ...... (idle for 26mn) | ||
| phreak has quit IRC (Quit: sleep) | [06:15] | |
| ............... (idle for 1h10mn) | ||
| cmeiklejohn has joined #arpnetworks | [07:25] | |
| ...... (idle for 28mn) | ||
| robotarmy has joined #arpnetworks
Jason_Wood has joined #arpnetworks | [07:53] | |
| .... (idle for 17mn) | ||
| d^_^b has quit IRC (Quit: Lost terminal)
ivan-kanis has joined #arpnetworks | [08:11] | |
| ..... (idle for 24mn) | ||
| heavysixer has quit IRC (Quit: BAMPF!)
robotarmy has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [08:36] | |
| LT has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) | [08:47] | |
| ..... (idle for 21mn) | ||
| ivan-kanis has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) | [09:08] | |
| .... (idle for 18mn) | ||
| HighJinx has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) | [09:26] | |
| ..... (idle for 23mn) | ||
| cubelogic has joined #arpnetworks | [09:49] | |
| ............ (idle for 55mn) | ||
| HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks
mattx86 has joined #arpnetworks | [10:44] | |
| RandalSchwartz | up_the_irons - http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp157.txt
ipv6 address assignment recommendations recently updated | [10:48] |
| mhoran | Interesting. | [10:49] |
| RandalSchwartz | backing off on the /48 rule
but firm on /64 per segment and saying "no more /128 please" | [10:49] |
| mhoran | Makes sense. | [10:49] |
| RandalSchwartz | I'd think a place like arp would hand out /56
as a happy compromise between /48 and /64 still plenty-o-nets :) | [10:49] |
| mhoran | Yeah I think I'm using 1 address. Heh. | [11:00] |
| twobithacker | I'd like it if people would agree on a max routable prefix-length for v6
preferrably something longer than a /32 | [11:05] |
| up_the_irons | RandalSchwartz: the /48 vs /56 debate has gone on a long time; i still think making the differentiation between "well, this is a 'big' customer, give him more IPv6 space (/48); and this is a 'small' customer, give him less IPv6 space (/56)", is still IPv4-centric thinking
if we do, /32 - ISP, /48 - Customer of ISP, /64 - subnet of customer of ISP, we get a *lot* simpler addressing schemes and simple means less errors and therefore less costly | [11:17] |
| RandalSchwartz | I think the purpose of that recent memo though is to not bake those numbers into code, in case the assumption is false
(except for /64) and also to deprecate /128 | [11:20] |
| up_the_irons | yeah, i never bought into /128
just saw that comment about a fear of going back to classful addressing i dunno, in the end, that's not much of a case alone; but i'll read the whole thing and then decide it also bugs me a little that a /56 doesn't end on a ":" boundary ;) | [11:22] |
| RandalSchwartz | true | [11:27] |
| up_the_irons | " For example, a large business (which may have thousands of employees)
would, by default, receive the same amount of address space as a home user, who today typically has a single (or small number of) LAN and a small number of devices (dozens or less). " i can see the logic here | [11:27] |
| coobra | :D | [11:28] |
| up_the_irons | up_the_irons thinks
yeah, i can respect the /56 a little more but it begs the question -- in an IPv6 world, does that distinction actually matter? does the term "waste" even apply anymore? | [11:28] |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| a_j__c | geez, i still can't grasp the concept of /24 /48... etc | [11:44] |
| ............. (idle for 1h2mn) | ||
| *** | CRowen has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
CRowen has joined #arpnetworks | [12:46] |
| ..... (idle for 24mn) | ||
| heavysixer has joined #arpnetworks
ChanServ sets mode: +o heavysixer heavysixer has quit IRC (Client Quit) heavysixer has joined #arpnetworks ChanServ sets mode: +o heavysixer | [13:13] | |
| .... (idle for 16mn) | ||
| phreak has joined #arpnetworks | [13:29] | |
| ..... (idle for 24mn) | ||
| fink has joined #arpnetworks
a_j__c has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) a_j__c has joined #arpnetworks a_j__c has quit IRC (Changing host) a_j__c has joined #arpnetworks | [13:53] | |
| .................. (idle for 1h26mn) | ||
| mtve has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) | [15:22] | |
| HighJinx has quit IRC (*.net *.split) | [15:29] | |
| .... (idle for 16mn) | ||
| HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [15:45] | |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| d^_^b has joined #arpnetworks | [16:00] | |
| ................... (idle for 1h32mn) | ||
| mtve has joined #arpnetworks | [17:32] | |
| ........... (idle for 50mn) | ||
| cubelogic has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | [18:22] | |
| heavysixer has quit IRC (Quit: BAMPF!) | [18:31] | |
| fink has quit IRC (Quit: fink) | [18:36] | |
| HighJinx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | [18:46] | |
| ..... (idle for 22mn) | ||
| DDevine has quit IRC (Quit: leaving) | [19:08] | |
| ziyourenxiang has joined #arpnetworks | [19:20] | |
| ...... (idle for 25mn) | ||
| ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: ziyourenxiang) | [19:45] | |
| .......... (idle for 46mn) | ||
| G | up_the_irons: my view is, for commercial ISPs (not hosting providers) the default for home customers should be /56 | [20:31] |
| up_the_irons: my rationale, is that customers generally don't need to subnet or anything funny like that, the max the average home user needs is 2 (depending on deployment, you'd have the home network, + the link to the ISP being the second), it's only crazy people like me, that have subnetted their home network into about 5 different subnets | [20:38] | |
| *** | jkhii has joined #arpnetworks | [20:43] |
| ............. (idle for 1h0mn) | ||
| robotarmy has joined #arpnetworks | [21:43] | |
| ....... (idle for 34mn) | ||
| CRowen has quit IRC (Quit: changing servers)
CRowen has joined #arpnetworks | [22:17] | |
| jaja has joined #arpnetworks | [22:31] | |
| jaja | hi | [22:31] |
| up_the_irons here? | [22:38] | |
| *** | HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks
HighJinx has quit IRC (Client Quit) HighJinx has joined #arpnetworks | [22:44] |
| HighJinx | HighJinx drops a pin on up_the_irons, just cause | [22:49] |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |