thanks hubpub does everything install from source in freebsd? apache is taking forever you can install from packages e.g. "pkg_add -r apache22" but as a general rule, yes thanks is adding packages via pkg_add frowned upon? no, but you just get it however it was compiled, which could be without certain options that you may need from source is always the best option, imo sounds like im going to be spending a ton of time reading lol bookmark: freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ =) 90% of what you need/want to know is there thank you also, #freebsd =) Anyone else having rDNS problems? phlux: what kind of problems? phlux: judging from the IP you joined with, it appears as though ARP is delegating your ip6-arpa to ns1 and ns2.dragonzkeep.com upon further troubleshooting, I see: dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.dragonzkeep.com': not found it looks like your 2 NS's are having issues. and upon further troubleshooting: dragonzkeep.com is expired. Expiration date: 14 Nov 2010 09:11:39 I have my DNS delegated to my own NS servers you can either pay for the domain renewal, move the delegation to 2 NS's that work, or let ARP handle PTR However, as far as I know, arp is still in charge of the rDNS I don't even know what dragonzkeep.com is :P but my ipv6 isn't what's in question It my mail server the IP is 206.125.169.130 ok, then I'm troubleshooting a problem you don't have. which IP specifically are you concerned with? ok dragonzkeep.com are the NS's responsible for the rDNS for the IPv6 address you just joined with, btw. weird $ dig -x 206.125.169.130 +short mail.ewnix.net. seems to be working. what issues are you seeing? Well, I keep getting e-mails kicked back because the rDNS/DNS is supposedly set up incorrectly (just a headsup, I ave to leave soon to get fitted for a tux.) For instance, craigslist shoots the following: : Client host rejected: rDNS/DNS_validation_failed._Please_setup_matching_DNS_and_rDNS_records:_http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/rdns_failure xabd-4 (in reply to RCPT TO command) If I do a DNS Report from a website, I get rDNS failures for mail.ewnix.net the A and PTR records seem to match. is it just craigslist kicking an error? or others too? (it's possible the craigslist mailserver is having some DNS flakiness) Others...for example, my Dad has an AOL e-mail address (STILL...) and he can't receive e-mails from my domain. My stuff gets kicked into spam for gmail/yahoo because of it ok, which website are you doing the DNS report from, let me see what it says It's really becoming a nuisance I've tried several, actually. dnscolos.com, thednsreport.com, intodns.com according to thednsreport.com, ns3 and ns4.ewnix.net are reporting lame delegations. (IE your NS doesn't know about that domain) but when queried directly, it does. phlux: I have to run, and get fitted for my wedding. I'll be back in a couple hours if you haven't figured this out. the guys in #bind may be able to help in the meantime. aye, thanks. np. if it helps, the problem appears to be on the ewnix.net side, not on the arp side. but when I get back, I can look into it further. when i bring up the console i get a [no, customer is attached] any idea? i think i may have "firewalled" my self out it happend after i had locked my self out of by using pf from allow traffic from sms0 to em0 phlux: ping hey, jpalmer did you get your DNS issue figured out? Unfortunately, I haven't been able to look farther into it yet. ok, well.. let me know. is anyone who handles abuse available? I often handle abuse, but not for arp is there something odd going on? as long as you indent it properly. :) it's related to abuse going on from arpnetworks network block clarify what kind of absue? abuse are you an employee of arpnetworks? and the proper channel to report that is email to support@arpnetworks.com not abuse@arpnetworks.com? maybe that too probably goes to the same place what kind of abuse? that's where I sent it I can't say here why not? IRC? spam? wtf Email support@ and up_the_irons will take care of it ASAP. if you're not an employee it doesn't concern you yes, it does indeed concern me mike-burns: thanks I promote ARP to others if ARP is a haven of bad guys, *I* need to know I hope it's not then explain so I know the scope if the ARP handles it there's no need to make it public uh, this isn't public this is locals bad apples do get onto networks. it's companies that don't remove them that become havens friends the very people who are most interested the people that are helping *others* here eventually, they'll mellow out, but at 19, they're very "I have the world figured out" He's probably not 19 and just didn't want to argue with you about whether the subject at hand was abuse. I wasn't gonna argue whether it was just wanted to know the realm lots of IRC kiddies recently wondered if it was that and he's almost certainly 19 "htols is sloth @ college" that's a 19-year-old handle trick Could be 21. nope 21 they get a cooler nick :) Heh. actually it's post graduate security research going on from this server but not mine, just have a shell here which doesn't yet disclose your age. :) you could still be 19 nice play I'm going to assume that htols is a very mature 19 year old and RandalSchwartz is a very immature 49 year old. I've never claimed maturity, so that's irrelevant I'm just callin' em like I see 'em and lack of denial from "htols" confirms my claims an excitable 19-year-old probably blowing a bunch of stuff out of proportion some random IRC script kiddies who have been parking on ARP for a few weeks now messing up my IP traffic Yeah I gotta go do something interesting. ditto sorry but I'm dealing with multiple ISPs right now. No time to argue about my age with you right now htols: student or staff? htols: up_the_irons is the one who will handle your ticket, but from the logs you posted, it appears to be some kind of ftp transfer or similar. are you *sure* this wasn't legit traffic? neither, just have a shell here just ftp!? jpalmer: right, 100mb/s of FTP RandalSchwartz: I don't know the full story, so I'd recommend not jumping to conclusions ;) UDP FTP no less ftp isn't over udp wow, you're the smart one hence "or similar" it was all destined to a single port. it wasn't most DoS's, or DDoS's Ive seen, randomize. random port, dest and size there was that crappy "pseudo-ftp" thingy for a while, over udp source port was the same but I knew it was only for bad guys fsp, that was it "to make ftp work better" yeah right jpalmer, are you staff for ARP? jpalmer is an insider, yes. since you seem to want authority, instead of common sense. htols: I see it now, I was reading the logs backwards. the destination port is randomized. htols: I don't have the authority or the access to dig into this matter, that'll be up to Garry. I just wanted to verify that this was some misunderstood legit traffic. s/was/wasn't/ heh. amazing how 3 characters can change an entire meaning, eh? heh, one character is the difference between "Let's eat grandma" and "Let's eat, grandma" "I helped my uncle, Jack, off a horse" vs ... well, you know. ahhh, patch cluster is finally done installing. ok, calling it a night. later guys my girl, bill still betting on 19 seemed brash enough Someome was hitting someone else at 100mb/s from an arp vps? Wow I've done that to my oversee.net desktop but I'm only 4 hops 1.2ms from apr arp I've never thought to see what I could push on myself I grabbed about 50GB of download in 30 minutes once :) I'm 12 hops away :( oversee has dark fiber to one wilshire which of course is one hop from wilshire annex so my route is local lan -> fiber -> wilshire hop -> arp all at a gigabit :) nice and the dark fiber is to a cage that has gigabit to the internet backbones so I have gigabit service to my desk :) right to the "net" oversee.net's ASN is quite high on most routing tables, apparently what the hell does that mean? dunno - it just gets a lot of preferred routing not a lot of hops to anywhere oversee parks 2.5 million domain names 17 from here many of which are owned directly, but many from customers "it just gets a lot of preferred routing" ... dunno what that means either would "closer to the center of the net" make any more sense? it would ok - that's what I was meaning :) instead of being three hops out somewhere, it's peering with a lot of main backbones except that they're only at CIIX peering w/ uunet, ntt, level3, he, packetexchange, and xeex there, it seems