ballen: ptr, yes of course
coolio
http://208.79.89.202:3000/
just got it moved to ruby 1.9 and Rails 2.3
just a pain in the ass
such*
i bet
my friend Mark and I are trying to get pledgie.com onto Rails 2.3, and it is proving to be a true pain
yep
the more monkey patching and crazy out of the ordinary stuff you do, the harder it is going to be to upgrade
yeah, we hardly monkey patch at all, i dont believe in it; but some of the plugins we use do
yea sometimes, not as much now a days, ya just have to
yeah
syminet: yeah, thought you would like Annex.  did you get the full tour (like he showed you all the floors?)
syminet: and no problem on the 5 megs, hit me up any time you're ready
time for me to pass out for the night, later
g'night
I know *exactly* what syminet should do, but things like power outages bring me back - in a big way.
syminet: yeah
syminet: i'm surprised it took u this long, but i suppose you didn't see any other good alternatives at the time
But why was it that whne we moved them back over... my breaker was popped too?
Agreed.
for a managed switch
:-)
hahaah amen to that.  ;-)  Something happened, I think it was their router upstairs?  brb
ballen|away: Regarding Rails 2.3, this is what we ran into: http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159805595/rails-2-3-2-upgrade-gotchas
ballen|away: Make sure to upgrade to 2.3-stable instead of 2.3.0.
mike-burns: Yea moved to rails 2.3.3
Word.
was farely decent, I hade some monkey patching on attachment_fu that was broken
had*
Yeah attachment_fu is a pain.
I recommend Paperclip for the obvious reasons.
yea, using swfupload with it
Cool.
http://thewebfellas.com/blog/2008/12/22/flash-uploaders-rails-cookie-based-sessions-and-csrf-rack-middleware-to-the-rescue
if you ever have to use flash and maintain auth and cross-site forgery
Hmmm, I was just using Flash for file uploads and needed to maintain auth and cross-site protection ...
I can attest that that method works quite well
I just threw the class in the lib folder tough
Sure, there's no better or worse place for it.
urg greylisting makes testing my smtp server such a pain in the ass
Sure does.
... spammers make my life miserable.
yeep
hmm what should I run first rbl_client to spamhaus or postgrey
if I do postgrey first should be less queries to spamhaus
But spamhaus may prevent wasted time on postgrey.
Run the DNS checks, then greylist.t
yea but greylist isn't really adding any more traffic to my server
also, if you greylist first, you give spamhaus a little more time to catch the spammer
Perhaps!
Yeah, I guess it will slow down legit mail either way ...
I just ue SpamAssassin.
yep
I use spamassassin + optional spamhaus rbl
hate barracuda, due to their lack of criteria
any idea how to convert texttile to markdown?