up_the_irons: My SSH didn't disconnect, nor my IRC, so... I didn't even notice :) And save for a new hop in my traceroute (s32.lax.arp...) I don't think I'd ever know. I'll check graphs for bandwidth/latency effects later to accumulate more data. brycec: your /48 hasn't been moved yet btw, just your /64, but any2ix has moved.. mercutio: Oh sorry, I guess I misunderstood when it was said it would be moved that night. "it'll be moved tonight most likely" not likely enough I guess :P i was going to but i want to figure what is happening about that route first. I have no idea about the /64 yet (busy with other stuff. nobody's complained, but then again it sees *very little* traffic and even if v6 were flubbed, hosts should fallback to v4 for those hosts. So it's something I have to specifically look at) yeah active but less important is more useful in a way like box that ssh into to irc from :) Yeah I get it. I just meant to give it some context - I haven't touched anything over that connection yet today (and wouldn't have unless someone said something) yeah Doing the ol' "download various ISOs" test and for some reason the following URL just seems to timeout on ARP (both on the new v6 router and the old) https://iweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clonezilla/clonezilla_live_stable/2.5.5-38/clonezilla-live-2.5.5-38-i686-pae.iso (That URL *does* work from my home HE.net tunnel) 2607:f748:10:12::5f:2 is what it resolves to Oh mtr is telling me it's going out (@ ARP) via NTT,while my home connection goes HE->as6453.net so I guess it's upstream and not an ARP-specific issue. i've always found sourceforge mirrors to be terrible i thikn they're a lot better than tehy used to be though Location: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/clonezilla/clonezilla_live_stable/2.5.5-38/clonpae.iso?download&failedmirror=iweb.dl.sourceforge.net hmm heh, well I brought it up since it initially seemed like a simple routing glitch (and not a "SF mirrors are terrible" matter) and downloads.sourceforge.net doesn't have ipv6 yeh checking it out Is the v6 connection still bottlenecked to 100mbps? (I seem to recall the old router only had a 100mbps port) My last couple of v6 downloads topped at almost exactly 100mbps so I figured I'd ask and check. oh weird wget -6 on it fails intermittently that's been resolved for a while brycec but the old router was cpu bottlenecking a bit too Hm, could be Leaseweb throttling then. (http://mirror.sfo12.us.leaseweb.net/opnsense/releases/18.1/OPNsense-18.1.6-OpenSSL-dvd-amd64.iso.bz2 was one URL that capped at 100) openbsd tcp/ip stack sucks btw so you need a close site to get > 100 megabit i see what you mean but it goes too close to 100 megabit for ipv6 overhead etc looks like a traffic cap (fwiw I'm downloading from a Linux box) Cool cool, thanks for checking that said it's going faster over ipv4 hmm i wonder why it is going slower though it's not like it's far away (Side note: I just downloaded an ISO at 500mbps, that blew me away. v4 only though, so irrelevant to this) the kct don't have the 100 megabit limit either (This Linux host is stl actually, bare metal) *stl21 ah they aren't limited either Yeah I know, it was just a speed I don't often see, period. did you happen to see that ipv6 iso getting up to 11.9MB/sec btw? heh i'm getting gigabit fibre at home in a couple of days well only 500 megabit upload mercutio: yeah the v6 download from leaseweb topped at 12.0 i dunno how much i'll see those speeds though :) *12.0MB/s ah, so yeh oddly just over 100% utilisation of 100 megabit :) (And I just downloaded from Italy over v6 at a bit more than 100mbps (bursting to 14MB/s) i wonder if they have a traceroute site they do :) - traceroute ipv6 2607:f2f8:add0::2 Illegal IPv6 address. - traceroute ipv6 2607:F2F8:ADD0:0002:0:0:0:0 Illegal IPv6 address. i'm not sure how to make it work it didn't like name either What site? http://leasewebnoc.com/en/lookingglass CoreSite - Any2 Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA IP TBD it seems they might be joining any2ix hm yup no idea. All of their tools fail. heh Yet "ERROR: IPv6 address for IPv4 query" so something understands *that* much :P hmm i had a plugin for chrome to do web benchmark before but i think it stopped working but is there any nice way to test real world performance difference between vdsl and fibre? when i was testing ipv6 i downloaded linux kernel and it's pretty small now days i mean it's huge, it's nearly 100mb compressed but in the grand scheme of things it's not like you're waiting 15 minutes for it to download or anything :)