| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| *** | dne has joined #arpnetworks | [02:32] |
| ...................... (idle for 1h47mn) | ||
| BryceBot has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
BryceBot has joined #arpnetworks | [04:19] | |
| ............. (idle for 1h2mn) | ||
| Lucifer333 has joined #arpnetworks | [05:22] | |
| ...... (idle for 25mn) | ||
| Seji has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
eryc has quit IRC (*.net *.split) Seji has joined #arpnetworks eryc has joined #arpnetworks eryc has quit IRC (Changing host) eryc has joined #arpnetworks | [05:47] | |
| .............. (idle for 1h5mn) | ||
| qbit has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 1.5)
qbit has joined #arpnetworks | [06:54] | |
| .................. (idle for 1h28mn) | ||
| mkb | is there any tld I can use for a private network that icann has promised not to sell? | [08:26] |
| mike-burns | RFC 2606 says .test, .example, .invalid, .localhost. | [08:31] |
| sjackso | .icannhaz, .icannsux, .icannworstever...
more seriously, I suppose you could look at what opennic has defined: http://wiki.opennicproject.org/OpenNICNamespaces , though I don't see a reason why icann couldn't sell colliding tlds someday | [08:31] |
| mkb | there's a rfc that says example, test, invalid, and localhost are reserved
I guess test is the best one oh yeah mike-burns mentioned the rfc | [08:34] |
| ................. (idle for 1h21mn) | ||
| *** | mhoran has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
sjackso has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) KDE_Perry has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) up_the_irons has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) mhoran has joined #arpnetworks KDE_Perry has joined #arpnetworks sjackso has joined #arpnetworks up_the_irons has joined #arpnetworks ChanServ sets mode: +o up_the_irons | [09:56] |
| ......... (idle for 41mn) | ||
| abthorpet is now known as tabthorpe | [10:38] | |
| ............ (idle for 57mn) | ||
| dne has quit IRC (*.net *.split)
mkb has quit IRC (*.net *.split) CaZe has quit IRC (*.net *.split) mkb has joined #arpnetworks dne has joined #arpnetworks CaZe has joined #arpnetworks | [11:35] | |
| ................................................. (idle for 4h3mn) | ||
| ziyourenxiang | no localdomain? i think i saw some (mail-related?) application using localhost.localdomain when not configured. looks nice. | [15:39] |
| mike-burns | There's no guarantee that localdomain won't become a TLD in the future. | [15:41] |
| .... (idle for 19mn) | ||
| *** | ziyourenxiang has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) | [16:00] |
| mercutio | what
could someone make a TLD called localdomain? next you're going to say we should use the rest of 127.0.0.0/8 except 127.0.0.1/32 as we're running out of ip addresses | [16:01] |
| ........ (idle for 35mn) | ||
| mhoran | IPv6 seems super laggy right now? | [16:37] |
| ........ (idle for 36mn) | ||
| Yeah, IPv6 is totally busted. | [17:13] | |
| .... (idle for 19mn) | ||
| mercutio | what's it doing mhoran ? | [17:32] |
| mhoran | Seems better now, but it was unusable from home via ssh (just super laggy typing in weechat) and also weechat was showing 12 second lag to freenode. | [17:35] |
| mercutio | ahh. did it last long? | [17:35] |
| mhoran | maybe 30min. | [17:36] |
| *** | caseyandgina has joined #arpnetworks | [17:43] |
| caseyandgina | When building a custom kernel for a linux VM, is it ideal to use the No-Op I/O scheduler, which in theory should just leave everything up to the host I/O scheduler and not double-complicate things? | [17:44] |
| mercutio | deadline gives pretty similar performance tbh
but no-op vs deadline vs cfq is minor cfq has some advantages if you want to make use of it's advanced features usually people who test these things just do a single user doing read/write etc... when disk performance more matters under higher load which is much harder to test.. | [17:44] |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| up_the_irons | hmm | [18:00] |
| caseyandgina | Looks like EFI could be useful, for building a simpler kernel that uses ACPI "Reduced Hardware" mode. https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/ACPI/AcpiReducedHw
I will give it a try regardless ;) | [18:09] |
| ....... (idle for 34mn) | ||
| up_the_irons | let us know how it goes :) | [18:44] |
| nathani | how does 95th percentile billing work for bandwidth? Stats has never been one of my strong suites | [18:49] |
| mercutio | wikipedia describes it | [18:52] |
| up_the_irons | samples are taken periodically (say, every 5 minutes), and the top 5% are thrown away, what is left is what you're billed for (that is, the 95th percentile)
this makes it so one can burst, and not be penalized, for the most part | [18:53] |
| mercutio | you can burst quite a lot | [18:53] |
| up_the_irons | in a month, that's 36 available hours that are not "tracked", so-to-speak | [18:54] |
| mercutio | but if you leave bittorrent seeding at 100 megabit for 2 days then you get charged for 100 megabit | [18:54] |
| up_the_irons | right :) | [19:06] |
| .... (idle for 15mn) | ||
| *** | caseyandgina has quit IRC (Quit: Lost terminal) | [19:21] |
| .............. (idle for 1h7mn) | ||
| Lucifer333 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) | [20:28] | |
| nathani | whats the relation between monthly transfer and percentile, or does it only matter how much of the time you burst and not your actual monthly transfer?
nathani heads over to wikipedia for more info | [20:41] |
| *** | Lucifer333 has joined #arpnetworks | [20:54] |
| nathani | brycec: your backlit keyboard looks really cool | [21:08] |
| ...................... (idle for 1h48mn) | ||
| mercutio | it's only how much you burst
but you can only burst as fast as you can transfer so you might be able to do say 500 megabit for 4% of the time and 5 megabit the rest of the time and it's still accounted for as 500 megabi | [22:56] |
| up_the_irons | nathani: no relation, they measure different things. one is speed, the other is quantity. | [23:02] |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |