i can't believe that nanog is still 100% spam. mercutio: you would think that network operators would know how to configure spam filters etc if not contents.includes( beer ) : drop_as_spam gizmo do you read nanog? i'm pretty slack with it myself these days. i picked it up on outages first, that then said that it was happening on nanog worse @weather akl Auckland International, New Zealand: Scattered Clouds 61°F (16°C), Humidity: 77%, Wind: From the WSW at 16 MPH -- For more details including the forecast and almanac, see http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=-37.00805664,174.79167175 or re-request this with: @weather -v akl I am experiencing heavy packetloss again and its like 5pm nah I don't read nanog heh so it's getting worse mnathani? normally residential congestion starts late evening before it starts hitting early evening before it starts hitting late afternoon to my ARP VPS: Packets: Sent = 75, Received = 44, Lost = 31 (41% loss) hmm ok that's just dysfunctional is it like that to most places? Ping request could not find host google.com. Please check the name and try again. hahaha are you using linux? you can reduce the timeout for dns before it sends another request if you have high packet loss rather than high ping looks like options timeout:1 and options attempts:10 or such oh 5 is max at 40% loss the chances of 5 attempts all failing is too high for my liking. http://www.techtimes.com/articles/95911/20151018/the-city-of-chattanooga-is-now-offering-10-gbps-internet.htm i like it how $300 per month is considered "not cheap" for 10 gigabit internet. $70/month that's nce :) mercutio: one day... my 200/200 just isn't fast enough at home i'd like to do more than 10 megabit up i think that's meant to be fixed soon? no ufb for you yet? not until 2019 so VDSL now? i'm in chorus area two vdsl connections I think they've already rolled out the 998 dialplan to most regions if your upload hasn't improved by now it probably won't it's gone down from 38 acheivable to 36 acheivable yeah at higher distances 998 is worse than 997 but it's capped at 10 megabit attainable and i mispelt achievable :) pretty sure i'm still on 997 though they might not have completed the rollout, I can't remember what timeline they were aiming for yeah i think it's end of november mercutio: do you loadbalance or similar across your 2 VDSL? mnathani_: not really mnathani_: i have a /29 that's advertised to both, and i advertise a more specific /32 for one of the computers was doing two of them. then i have outbound route set to go out the same connection for both of them but yeah i'd like some nice way to get the throughput of both combined. atm if the outbound route stops working i can manualyl switch it over i'm still trying to figure out if my phone is going to get this android m update it's confusing as. as i have a moto g lte - which i think was released in 2014, but is 1st generation, and 1st generation doesn't get it, moto g 2nd generation is 2014, 2nd generation with lte came out this year in some regions. and it says "2014 moto g and moto g with 4g lte i think that means i get it. i hope it does. apparently it improves standby battery life heaps. are you running a routing protocol with the ISPs? or are you statically advertising your /29 to both Isps? no routing protocol anymore. how does reverse pack back to you work for home use it seems cleaner just changing a default route if necessary rather than having a huge route table come through when you switch ISPs reverse pack? Path it'e the same isp ahh can send out either path terminates on different gear though. isnt there some kind of multilink ppp my ISP offers it yeah but it means you have to terminate on the same gear :/ it's also pretty disgusting. true, but would allow for higher bandwidth? it splits every packet in half and sends half out each. if one of the connections is faster than the other it don't work so well. and more failure domains yeah it would allow higher bandwidth. i'd rather have something higher level so that a tcp connection can just share bw on both paths i haven't tried mptcp yet @google mptcp 7,560 total results returned for 'mptcp', here's 3 multipath TCP (MPTCP) for FreeBSD (http://caia.swin.edu.au/urp/newtcp/mptcp/) Jun 4, 2015 ... Overview. The IETF's Multipath TCP (MPTCP) working group is focused on an idea that has emerged in various forms over recent years ... Multipath TCP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipath_TCP) Multipath TCP (MPTCP) is an ongoing effort of the Internet Engineering Task Force's (IETF) Multipath TCP working group, that aims at allowing a Transmission  ... FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report (https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-01-2013-03.html) Kernel. AMD GPU Kernel Mode-Setting (KMS) Support; Atomic "close-on-exec"; callout(9) Improvements; Multipath TCP (MPTCP) for FreeBSD; racct: Block IO ... my first result is actually: www.multipath-tcp.org on google.ca MultiPath TCP - Linux Kernel implementation yeah apple are starting to do it i actually had a skype call keep working when going from wifi to 3g on android once though in theory that sort of stuff should work more often with mptcp but skype uses udp so it must be able to (sometimes) handle ip changing where is IPv6 mobility? most people don't have ipv6 still