yea, that's annoying mercutio: yup, I am dealing with cPanel yew i can see its use, but eek finally fixed my file server.. dodgy RAM was crashing it, just managed to pull 4GB of ancient PC6400 for £10 and surprisingly, it handled a 6 hour memtest bashing mnathani_: my condolences interesting.. i wouldn't have suspected a double in capacity would actually improve this things performance it rarely used the 2GB before now it's using 2.6GB although honestly speaking, last i used one was about 4 years ago threshold used to be slackware was borderlining hate (yet i loved it), debian (swear by as i have no time for BS), gentoo (simply because its LFS w/ the base already fixed and you can do wtf ever), but ultimately my homey is FreeBSD if i can't do it in FreeBSD, it isn't worth doing (impo) well cpanel is like steamos on top of debian except with source. err at least with things like easyapache i used centos 7 somewhat recently, it was alright i'm not a huge linux guy though so i only use it when i have to (in this case, i was just refamiliarizing myself w/it since the last centos i'd used was 5.x) wasn't a huge fan of how unreliable EPEL repos are epel? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL adds things that should be in the main repos but aren't like nginx ahh i see nginx has official pacakges i use those on ubuntu i really want something in betwen arch linux and ubuntu epel would regularly error out when running yum updates though like a stablised form of arch it was super annoying i get minor problems with arch sometimes. but overall i prefer it i was ok with it on a personal server used it for around a year yeah i had some problem with nginx and upgrades and having to update some locally built stuff i'm using a aur package for nginx for fancyindex of all things haha i want a better index actually i wonder if anyone knows of any good ones i'd like something that could be gui like and show snapshots of content etc. i haven't looked for anything like that in probably 10yrs the thing i deployed back then was a mess of php stuff yeh that's what i fear :) CVE-2015-5366 "A remote attacker can cause a denial of service against applications that use epoll by injecting a single packet with an invalid checksum." does that sound more than slightly disconcerting to anyone else? haha mercutio: Do you know why https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5366 isn't yet updated? i'm not usually too concerned about dos attacks but when it's a single packet someone could just send one packet to each ip in the world and ddos everyone! kellytk: it only came out today https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5366 has more information https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3246 there's usually a hold while distributions organise releases. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3245 those two are fun too that has less information kelly what's libuser? i don't have it on my system mercutio: It has more information for what I'm being shown https://fedorahosted.org/libuser/ kelly: mine says "reserved" this candidate has been reserved... blah blah Which is less than the redhat information kelly: no my redhat one says that i used the lwn one Ok, well I see more information on the redhat page, so I don't know what we're talking about https://lwn.net/Articles/652164/ which is the same as e-mail one basically maybe it's caching old versions? i dunno ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. that's what the redhat one tells me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239029 oh there's more here is that what you were thinking of? https://ma.ttias.be/chrome-44-sending-https-header-by-mistake-breaking-web-applications-everywhere/ whoops can a FreeBSD host be used for kvm, xen or other kinds of virtualization? behyve or whatever it is I've done bhyve and qemu Oh and VirtualBox k freebsd was going to support xen dom0 dunno what happened. netbsd supports dom0 and freebsd supports domu yea, runs well in domu too (netbsd, i mean) it's very light on memory usage. this chrome bug is driving me batshit. haha which one? new 44.x build released to stable, also in beta still (they haven't incremented beta up yet) https://ma.ttias.be/chrome-44-sending-https-header-by-mistake-breaking-web-applications-everywhere/ it's causing tabs to die spontaneously click a link, "it's dead jim" it's super annoying i wonder why i haven't hit it are you on that build? oh i have chrome 46 canary? or dev? yellow i have an older one too but the yellow one is more stable yeah, i rolled up to beta and it's the same build as stable right now thought maybe i'd get lucky but nope ahh the other one is beta and 44.0.2403.89 beta-m 64 bit yeah, that's the stable build just missing the beta tag does canary fix it? it is canary it works along side on windows, so you can have both :) on linux i have chromium and chrome i might grab one of the windows chromium builds seems he's at 46.0.2464.0 atm http://chromium.woolyss.com/download/en/ chromium is better than chrome in some ways. i kind of wish someone would do a nice chromium fork that follows updtes. with auto update etc. but without the google tie in stuff that reminds me i should disable flash to be fair, i would reckon a nontrivial amount of people that like privacy enough to not use chrome and instead use chromium would not want autoupdates