[02:43] *** mnathani__ has joined #arpnetworks [02:43] *** mnathani_ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [08:07] yea, that's annoying [09:15] mercutio: yup, I am dealing with cPanel [09:15] *** mnathani__ is now known as mnathani_ [12:59] yew [12:59] i can see its use, but eek [12:59] finally fixed my file server.. dodgy RAM was crashing it, just managed to pull 4GB of ancient PC6400 for £10 [13:00] and surprisingly, it handled a 6 hour memtest bashing [13:00] mnathani_: my condolences [13:01] interesting.. i wouldn't have suspected a double in capacity would actually improve this things performance [13:01] it rarely used the 2GB before [13:03] now it's using 2.6GB [13:12] * grody has never liked RPM systems [13:12] although honestly speaking, last i used one was about 4 years ago [13:16] threshold used to be slackware was borderlining hate (yet i loved it), debian (swear by as i have no time for BS), gentoo (simply because its LFS w/ the base already fixed and you can do wtf ever), but ultimately my homey is FreeBSD [13:16] if i can't do it in FreeBSD, it isn't worth doing (impo) [13:40] well cpanel is like steamos on top of debian [13:40] except with source. [13:40] err at least with things like easyapache [15:39] *** Seji has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [15:49] i used centos 7 somewhat recently, it was alright [15:49] i'm not a huge linux guy though so i only use it when i have to (in this case, i was just refamiliarizing myself w/it since the last centos i'd used was 5.x) [15:50] wasn't a huge fan of how unreliable EPEL repos are [16:00] epel? [16:00] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL [16:00] adds things that should be in the main repos but aren't [16:00] like nginx [16:00] ahh [16:00] i see [16:00] nginx has official pacakges [16:01] i use those on ubuntu [16:01] i really want something in betwen arch linux and ubuntu [16:01] epel would regularly error out when running yum updates though [16:01] like a stablised form of arch [16:01] it was super annoying [16:01] i get minor problems with arch sometimes. [16:02] but overall i prefer it [16:02] i was ok with it on a personal server [16:02] used it for around a year [16:03] yeah i had some problem with nginx and upgrades and having to update some locally built stuff [16:03] i'm using a aur package for nginx [16:03] for fancyindex of all things [16:03] haha [16:03] i want a better index actually [16:03] i wonder if anyone knows of any good ones [16:04] i'd like something that could be gui like [16:04] and show snapshots of content etc. [16:21] i haven't looked for anything like that in probably 10yrs [16:21] the thing i deployed back then was a mess of php stuff [16:28] yeh that's what i fear :) [17:23] CVE-2015-5366 [17:28] "A remote attacker can cause a denial of service against applications that use epoll by injecting a single packet with an invalid checksum." [17:28] does that sound more than slightly disconcerting to anyone else? [17:29] haha [17:29] mercutio: Do you know why https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5366 isn't yet updated? [17:29] i'm not usually too concerned about dos attacks [17:29] but when it's a single packet [17:29] someone could just send one packet to each ip in the world and ddos everyone! [17:29] kellytk: it only came out today [17:29] https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5366 has more information [17:29] https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3246 [17:29] there's usually a hold while distributions organise releases. [17:30] https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3245 [17:30] those two are fun too [17:30] that has less information kelly [17:31] what's libuser? [17:31] i don't have it on my system [17:31] mercutio: It has more information for what I'm being shown [17:31] https://fedorahosted.org/libuser/ [17:31] kelly: mine says "reserved" this candidate has been reserved... [17:31] blah blah [17:32] Which is less than the redhat information [17:32] kelly: no my redhat one says that [17:32] i used the lwn one [17:32] Ok, well I see more information on the redhat page, so I don't know what we're talking about [17:32] https://lwn.net/Articles/652164/ [17:32] which is the same as e-mail one basically [17:33] maybe it's caching old versions? [17:33] i dunno [17:33] ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. [17:33] that's what the redhat one tells me [17:33] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239029 [17:34] oh there's more here [17:34] is that what you were thinking of? [21:34] https://ma.ttias.be/chrome-44-sending-https-header-by-mistake-breaking-web-applications-everywhere/ [21:34] whoops [21:49] can a FreeBSD host be used for kvm, xen or other kinds of virtualization? [21:49] behyve [21:49] or whatever it is [21:49] I've done bhyve and qemu [21:49] Oh and VirtualBox [21:52] k [22:34] *** Seji has joined #arpnetworks [22:50] freebsd was going to support xen dom0 [22:50] dunno what happened. [22:50] netbsd supports dom0 [22:50] and freebsd supports domu [22:50] yea, runs well in domu too [22:50] (netbsd, i mean) [22:50] it's very light on memory usage. [22:51] this chrome bug is driving me batshit. [22:51] haha [22:51] which one? [22:51] new 44.x build released to stable, also in beta still (they haven't incremented beta up yet) [22:51] https://ma.ttias.be/chrome-44-sending-https-header-by-mistake-breaking-web-applications-everywhere/ [22:51] it's causing tabs to die spontaneously [22:51] click a link, "it's dead jim" [22:52] it's super annoying [22:52] i wonder why i haven't hit it [22:52] are you on that build? [22:52] oh i have chrome 46 [22:53] canary? [22:53] or dev? [22:53] yellow [22:53] i have an older one too but the yellow one is more stable [22:53] yeah, i rolled up to beta and it's the same build as stable right now [22:53] thought maybe i'd get lucky but nope [22:53] ahh the other one is beta [22:53] and 44.0.2403.89 [22:53] beta-m 64 bit [22:53] yeah, that's the stable build [22:54] just missing the beta tag [22:54] does canary fix it? [22:54] it is canary [22:54] it works along side on windows, so you can have both :) [22:54] on linux i have chromium and chrome [22:56] i might grab one of the windows chromium builds [22:57] seems he's at 46.0.2464.0 atm [22:57] http://chromium.woolyss.com/download/en/ [23:32] chromium is better than chrome in some ways. [23:32] i kind of wish someone would do a nice chromium fork that follows updtes. [23:32] with auto update etc. [23:32] but without the google tie in stuff [23:36] that reminds me i should disable flash [23:41] to be fair, i would reckon a nontrivial amount of people that like privacy enough to not use chrome and instead use chromium [23:41] would not want autoupdates